The China Mail - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 65.999546
ALL 83.886299
AMD 382.569343
ANG 1.789982
AOA 916.999667
ARS 1450.724895
AUD 1.535992
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.703625
BAM 1.701894
BBD 2.013462
BDT 121.860805
BGN 1.698675
BHD 0.376969
BIF 2951
BMD 1
BND 1.306514
BOB 6.907654
BRL 5.340706
BSD 0.999682
BTN 88.718716
BWP 13.495075
BYN 3.407518
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010599
CAD 1.40972
CDF 2221.000107
CHF 0.8083
CLF 0.024025
CLP 942.260127
CNY 7.12675
CNH 7.124335
COP 3834.5
CRC 501.842642
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.374981
CZK 21.130974
DJF 177.719889
DKK 6.481435
DOP 64.297733
DZD 130.702957
EGP 47.350598
ERN 15
ETB 153.125026
EUR 0.868055
FJD 2.281097
FKP 0.766404
GBP 0.765345
GEL 2.714973
GGP 0.766404
GHS 10.924959
GIP 0.766404
GMD 73.496433
GNF 8691.000207
GTQ 7.661048
GYD 209.152772
HKD 7.774794
HNL 26.359887
HRK 6.537806
HTG 130.911876
HUF 335.451502
IDR 16695.1
ILS 3.253855
IMP 0.766404
INR 88.641051
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.439107
ISK 127.05977
JEP 0.766404
JMD 160.956848
JOD 0.709027
JPY 153.633017
KES 129.201234
KGS 87.449557
KHR 4027.000211
KMF 427.999878
KPW 900.033283
KRW 1447.48028
KWD 0.30713
KYD 0.83313
KZT 525.140102
LAK 21712.500514
LBP 89549.999727
LKR 304.599802
LRD 182.625016
LSL 17.379986
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.455014
MAD 9.301979
MDL 17.135125
MGA 4500.000656
MKD 53.533982
MMK 2099.044592
MNT 3585.031206
MOP 8.006805
MRU 38.249781
MUR 45.999702
MVR 15.404977
MWK 1736.000423
MXN 18.58737
MYR 4.18301
MZN 63.960022
NAD 17.380215
NGN 1440.729964
NIO 36.770288
NOK 10.170899
NPR 141.949154
NZD 1.7668
OMR 0.384495
PAB 0.999687
PEN 3.376505
PGK 4.216027
PHP 58.845981
PKR 280.85006
PLN 3.69242
PYG 7077.158694
QAR 3.640957
RON 4.414195
RSD 101.74198
RUB 81.125016
RWF 1450
SAR 3.750543
SBD 8.223823
SCR 13.740948
SDG 600.503506
SEK 9.536655
SGD 1.304925
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.200677
SLL 20969.499529
SOS 571.507056
SRD 38.558019
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.45
SVC 8.747031
SYP 11056.895466
SZL 17.38022
THB 32.350333
TJS 9.257197
TMT 3.5
TND 2.960056
TOP 2.342104
TRY 42.11875
TTD 6.775354
TWD 30.898017
TZS 2459.806973
UAH 42.064759
UGX 3491.230589
UYU 39.758439
UZS 11987.497487
VES 227.27225
VND 26315
VUV 122.169446
WST 2.82328
XAF 570.814334
XAG 0.020533
XAU 0.000249
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801656
XDR 0.70875
XOF 570.495888
XPF 104.149691
YER 238.497406
ZAR 17.363401
ZMK 9001.204121
ZMW 22.392878
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.2400

    23.83

    +1.01%

  • SCS

    0.0600

    15.93

    +0.38%

  • BCC

    0.9700

    71.38

    +1.36%

  • CMSD

    0.1900

    24.01

    +0.79%

  • RIO

    1.1700

    69.06

    +1.69%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    76

    0%

  • NGG

    0.2300

    75.37

    +0.31%

  • BCE

    0.1000

    22.39

    +0.45%

  • JRI

    0.0700

    13.77

    +0.51%

  • RELX

    0.2800

    44.58

    +0.63%

  • RYCEF

    0.1500

    15.1

    +0.99%

  • GSK

    -0.1300

    46.69

    -0.28%

  • BTI

    0.9000

    53.88

    +1.67%

  • BP

    0.5600

    35.68

    +1.57%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    11.27

    +0.62%

  • AZN

    -0.8800

    81.15

    -1.08%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.