The China Mail - Milei suffers crushing Defeat

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 66.000108
ALL 83.901353
AMD 382.570077
ANG 1.789982
AOA 916.999801
ARS 1450.724808
AUD 1.534696
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.69797
BAM 1.701894
BBD 2.013462
BDT 121.860805
BGN 1.69918
BHD 0.377041
BIF 2951
BMD 1
BND 1.306514
BOB 6.907654
BRL 5.361505
BSD 0.999682
BTN 88.718716
BWP 13.495075
BYN 3.407518
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010599
CAD 1.409215
CDF 2221.000153
CHF 0.80857
CLF 0.024076
CLP 944.483424
CNY 7.126749
CNH 7.124445
COP 3834.5
CRC 501.842642
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.374996
CZK 21.140968
DJF 177.72029
DKK 6.479905
DOP 64.296439
DZD 130.854023
EGP 47.330044
ERN 15
ETB 153.125036
EUR 0.86811
FJD 2.2795
FKP 0.766404
GBP 0.764305
GEL 2.715031
GGP 0.766404
GHS 10.924986
GIP 0.766404
GMD 73.509182
GNF 8691.000271
GTQ 7.661048
GYD 209.152772
HKD 7.774705
HNL 26.35987
HRK 6.539017
HTG 130.911876
HUF 335.563972
IDR 16696.1
ILS 3.257715
IMP 0.766404
INR 88.621799
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.499493
ISK 127.610373
JEP 0.766404
JMD 160.956848
JOD 0.708971
JPY 153.642986
KES 129.19854
KGS 87.449835
KHR 4026.999604
KMF 428.000324
KPW 900.033283
KRW 1446.10203
KWD 0.30709
KYD 0.83313
KZT 525.140102
LAK 21712.50351
LBP 89550.000099
LKR 304.599802
LRD 182.625009
LSL 17.37969
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.454987
MAD 9.302002
MDL 17.135125
MGA 4499.99989
MKD 53.533982
MMK 2099.044592
MNT 3585.031206
MOP 8.006805
MRU 38.250003
MUR 46.000322
MVR 15.405
MWK 1735.999682
MXN 18.58065
MYR 4.1825
MZN 63.96023
NAD 17.379867
NGN 1441.160333
NIO 36.770147
NOK 10.174201
NPR 141.949154
NZD 1.765395
OMR 0.384511
PAB 0.999687
PEN 3.376498
PGK 4.215987
PHP 58.922004
PKR 280.849885
PLN 3.69217
PYG 7077.158694
QAR 3.640972
RON 4.413295
RSD 101.779005
RUB 81.353148
RWF 1450
SAR 3.750456
SBD 8.223823
SCR 13.740975
SDG 600.441137
SEK 9.53742
SGD 1.305045
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.198831
SLL 20969.499529
SOS 571.503834
SRD 38.558031
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.45
SVC 8.747031
SYP 11056.895466
SZL 17.379605
THB 32.368036
TJS 9.257197
TMT 3.5
TND 2.959469
TOP 2.342104
TRY 42.11808
TTD 6.775354
TWD 30.903499
TZS 2459.806976
UAH 42.064759
UGX 3491.230589
UYU 39.758439
UZS 11987.500677
VES 227.27225
VND 26314.5
VUV 122.169446
WST 2.82328
XAF 570.814334
XAG 0.020505
XAU 0.000249
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801656
XDR 0.70875
XOF 570.495095
XPF 104.150276
YER 238.497322
ZAR 17.35745
ZMK 9001.197493
ZMW 22.392878
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    76

    0%

  • CMSC

    0.2400

    23.83

    +1.01%

  • NGG

    0.2300

    75.37

    +0.31%

  • BTI

    0.9000

    53.88

    +1.67%

  • SCS

    0.0600

    15.93

    +0.38%

  • BCC

    0.9700

    71.38

    +1.36%

  • RIO

    1.1700

    69.06

    +1.69%

  • GSK

    -0.1300

    46.69

    -0.28%

  • BCE

    0.1000

    22.39

    +0.45%

  • CMSD

    0.1900

    24.01

    +0.79%

  • RELX

    0.2800

    44.58

    +0.63%

  • RYCEF

    0.1500

    15.1

    +0.99%

  • JRI

    0.0700

    13.77

    +0.51%

  • BP

    0.5600

    35.68

    +1.57%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    11.27

    +0.62%

  • AZN

    -0.8800

    81.15

    -1.08%


Milei suffers crushing Defeat




Argentina’s political earthquake arrived in its largest province. In Buenos Aires—home to roughly two out of every five Argentines and a third of national output—voters delivered a decisive rebuke to President Javier Milei’s libertarian experiment. The opposition’s double‑digit win there has redefined the battlefield ahead of the October 26 midterms and raised the most consequential question of Milei’s tenure: has the shock‑therapy project reached its political limits, or can it be reshaped to survive?

The weekend vote was more than a provincial skirmish. Buenos Aires Province is the bellwether of national mood, the place where governing coalitions are tested against kitchen‑table realities. Since taking office in December 2023, Milei has cut public spending, torn up regulations, and promised to “chainsaw” a bloated state. The promise was stabilization and a return to growth. The reality, for now, is disinflation alongside recessionary pain—and a public impatient with the trade‑offs.

The defeat capped a brutal week in Congress. Senators in a rare show of cross‑party force overturned the president’s veto of an emergency law for people with disabilities, the first time lawmakers have reversed a veto in his term. That vote exposed a governing weakness that polls had long foreshadowed: with only a small minority in the legislature, the administration needs allies to pass—or defend—its agenda. Without them, vetoes can be overridden and decrees can be struck down, turning executive maximalism into legislative stasis.

The economic fallout was immediate. Investors who had priced in a tighter race in Buenos Aires marked down Argentine assets: the peso slid, local stocks tumbled, and dollar bonds sank. Those moves do not merely reflect skittish traders; they speak to a deeper concern about policy durability. Stabilization plans succeed when markets, businesses, and households believe governments can stick with them through the next election. A double‑digit loss in the country’s biggest province—on the eve of national midterms—casts doubt on that belief.

Yet the macro scoreboard holds genuine wins. Monthly inflation, once galloping, is now down to the low single digits, with August clocking in at 1.9% and the annual rate falling to the mid‑30s—its lowest in years. That is not trivial in a country battered by recurring price spirals. But stabilization has not felt like relief. Unemployment climbed earlier this year, real wages are fragile, and public services—from universities to hospitals—have become flashpoints in street politics and Senate votes alike. In short, disinflation without growth has proved a hard sell.

Politically, the map is shifting. The Peronist opposition emerges emboldened and more unified in the province that most shapes national outcomes. Moderate center‑right blocs, kingmakers on pivotal bills, now see greater leverage in demanding changes to the government’s approach. Meanwhile, the administration is fending off an ethics storm tied to the disability agency that, regardless of legal outcomes, has further complicated coalition building. Governance in Argentina has always been a game of arithmetic; after Buenos Aires, the numbers look harsher for the Casa Rosada.

Milei’s response has been defiance and focus. He scrapped a high‑profile foreign trip and insisted the program will not retreat “one millimeter.” That message shores up his core base—and markets like clarity—but it also hardens the lines with potential legislative partners who bristle at being bulldozed. If the government wants to avoid paralysis, it faces a strategic choice: continue governing by confrontation, or translate a movement into a coalition that can last beyond a single news cycle.

What would a survivable version of the project look like? First, a pivot from chainsaw to scalpel: prioritize a handful of reforms with broad support (tax rationalization, simplification of import/export rules, and credible, rules‑based monetary policy) over sprawling omnibus fights that unify the opposition. Second, institutionalize the stabilization: codify fiscal rules, improve budget transparency, and pre‑agree social floors (for disability benefits, school meals, essential medicines) that take the sting out of austerity. Third, build a minimum viable coalition: offer procedural concessions in Congress and genuine co‑ownership of reforms to centrists who can deliver votes and legitimacy.

None of this is guaranteed. The midterms on October 26 could narrow or widen the path. A better‑than‑expected result for the ruling party would reduce veto risks and revive momentum; a worse‑than‑expected outcome would turn the next year into a trench war of vetoes, court challenges, and market flare‑ups. In either case, Argentina does not need to “fail again.” It needs a version of reform that is less theatrical and more durable—a politics that trades viral moments for legislative math.

The Buenos Aires result was a verdict on pace, priorities, and tone. It was not a binding judgment on whether Argentina must choose between stabilization and dignity. The question now is whether the president can adjust his method without abandoning his aim—turning a shock into a strategy, and a plurality into a governing majority. If he can, the project may yet outlast the week’s defeat. If he cannot, the defeat may define the project.