The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672502
AFN 66.737984
ALL 83.174731
AMD 382.481965
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.00032
ARS 1429.811398
AUD 1.515737
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.692558
BAM 1.680652
BBD 2.013396
BDT 121.748022
BGN 1.680245
BHD 0.376994
BIF 2945.252856
BMD 1
BND 1.295062
BOB 6.908049
BRL 5.336301
BSD 0.999643
BTN 88.664321
BWP 13.308816
BYN 3.397906
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010474
CAD 1.394025
CDF 2409.999665
CHF 0.800803
CLF 0.024241
CLP 950.970282
CNY 7.1195
CNH 7.132625
COP 3889.25
CRC 503.091154
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.752581
CZK 20.92985
DJF 178.009392
DKK 6.41255
DOP 62.587805
DZD 130.10199
EGP 47.5593
ERN 15
ETB 145.326837
EUR 0.858889
FJD 2.25845
FKP 0.743972
GBP 0.745581
GEL 2.720241
GGP 0.743972
GHS 12.346666
GIP 0.743972
GMD 72.000138
GNF 8669.837301
GTQ 7.659951
GYD 209.157741
HKD 7.780445
HNL 26.234636
HRK 6.469796
HTG 130.8037
HUF 335.879501
IDR 16522.7
ILS 3.280395
IMP 0.743972
INR 88.76345
IQD 1309.639916
IRR 42074.999399
ISK 121.450209
JEP 0.743972
JMD 160.001031
JOD 0.708947
JPY 152.499499
KES 129.399323
KGS 87.45028
KHR 4013.558973
KMF 423.999995
KPW 900.00029
KRW 1418.975023
KWD 0.30646
KYD 0.833076
KZT 540.094177
LAK 21677.843987
LBP 89517.917521
LKR 302.493137
LRD 182.45017
LSL 17.161748
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.436431
MAD 9.11022
MDL 16.968478
MGA 4468.064082
MKD 52.930211
MMK 2099.241766
MNT 3597.321295
MOP 8.014058
MRU 39.931088
MUR 45.749782
MVR 15.296617
MWK 1733.358538
MXN 18.328215
MYR 4.214502
MZN 63.849611
NAD 17.162559
NGN 1471.420595
NIO 36.784513
NOK 9.970235
NPR 141.851943
NZD 1.724425
OMR 0.384501
PAB 0.999729
PEN 3.441994
PGK 4.196579
PHP 57.884999
PKR 283.146033
PLN 3.653132
PYG 6980.550865
QAR 3.644793
RON 4.3725
RSD 100.591989
RUB 81.450367
RWF 1450.488265
SAR 3.750773
SBD 8.271757
SCR 14.841833
SDG 601.499565
SEK 9.420755
SGD 1.294435
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.215032
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.315641
SRD 38.152501
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.051637
SVC 8.747508
SYP 13001.812646
SZL 17.15307
THB 32.590279
TJS 9.29738
TMT 3.51
TND 2.935684
TOP 2.342096
TRY 41.721498
TTD 6.788341
TWD 30.496998
TZS 2454.078045
UAH 41.452471
UGX 3433.830448
UYU 39.906678
UZS 12020.125202
VES 189.012825
VND 26347
VUV 121.219369
WST 2.770863
XAF 563.628943
XAG 0.020452
XAU 0.000249
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80166
XDR 0.700971
XOF 563.626521
XPF 102.482137
YER 239.00032
ZAR 17.162545
ZMK 9001.198718
ZMW 23.711876
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.0300

    23.71

    -0.13%

  • RBGPF

    -1.4100

    75.73

    -1.86%

  • SCS

    -0.0700

    16.79

    -0.42%

  • RYCEF

    0.0200

    15.41

    +0.13%

  • NGG

    -0.2700

    73.61

    -0.37%

  • GSK

    -0.1500

    43.35

    -0.35%

  • BTI

    -0.3800

    51.6

    -0.74%

  • RIO

    1.4500

    67.7

    +2.14%

  • BP

    -0.4500

    34.52

    -1.3%

  • RELX

    0.4000

    45.84

    +0.87%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    24.33

    -0.29%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    23.23

    -0.26%

  • VOD

    0.0000

    11.27

    0%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    14.12

    +0.35%

  • BCC

    1.9000

    76.42

    +2.49%

  • AZN

    -0.4900

    85.38

    -0.57%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.