The China Mail - Brazil's Porto Alegre: a flood disaster waiting to happen

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 63.500465
ALL 83.283733
AMD 367.003219
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.000184
ARS 1471.035205
AUD 1.449338
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.689175
BAM 1.724577
BBD 2.013888
BDT 122.992813
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.377147
BIF 2984.81535
BMD 1
BND 1.298984
BOB 6.909809
BRL 5.201836
BSD 0.999934
BTN 94.624111
BWP 13.680173
BYN 2.818068
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01104
CAD 1.423225
CDF 2268.99975
CHF 0.81263
CLF 0.023263
CLP 915.590329
CNY 6.790496
CNH 6.81352
COP 3428.35
CRC 455.186766
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.22259
CZK 21.37625
DJF 178.061717
DKK 6.592015
DOP 58.613453
DZD 133.528416
EGP 49.636698
ERN 15
ETB 161.211774
EUR 0.88182
FJD 2.24825
FKP 0.758197
GBP 0.759805
GEL 2.645016
GGP 0.758197
GHS 11.199781
GIP 0.758197
GMD 72.49805
GNF 8761.518452
GTQ 7.627362
GYD 209.162776
HKD 7.840295
HNL 26.755726
HRK 6.640898
HTG 130.744947
HUF 314.087979
IDR 17976
ILS 2.984749
IMP 0.758197
INR 94.412
IQD 1309.878094
IRR 1375049.999798
ISK 126.810208
JEP 0.758197
JMD 157.488647
JOD 0.708978
JPY 161.677495
KES 129.590162
KGS 87.449821
KHR 4017.494974
KMF 430.999856
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1546.34502
KWD 0.30947
KYD 0.833297
KZT 486.623047
LAK 21948.961236
LBP 89556.012134
LKR 337.341005
LRD 182.134827
LSL 16.623945
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.430933
MAD 9.401479
MDL 17.709096
MGA 4177.101337
MKD 54.353625
MMK 2099.539901
MNT 3580.066416
MOP 8.076099
MRU 39.982188
MUR 48.209966
MVR 15.45971
MWK 1733.881812
MXN 17.6195
MYR 4.137977
MZN 63.902143
NAD 16.623945
NGN 1372.679674
NIO 36.797319
NOK 9.83835
NPR 151.394749
NZD 1.772154
OMR 0.384501
PAB 0.999965
PEN 3.391297
PGK 4.386951
PHP 61.5525
PKR 278.100478
PLN 3.78105
PYG 6099.351442
QAR 3.635217
RON 4.618803
RSD 103.50701
RUB 74.893431
RWF 1468.89467
SAR 3.754889
SBD 8.065041
SCR 13.65272
SDG 600.499082
SEK 9.77475
SGD 1.29826
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.750204
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.478959
SRD 37.482989
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.603509
SVC 8.749173
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.621989
THB 33.430499
TJS 9.284423
TMT 3.51
TND 2.972467
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.49775
TTD 6.780184
TWD 31.733017
TZS 2620.502978
UAH 44.88455
UGX 3689.350352
UYU 39.918699
UZS 12024.108178
VES 616.865275
VND 26335
VUV 118.798432
WST 2.761642
XAF 578.424923
XAG 0.016838
XAU 0.000248
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802141
XDR 0.716966
XOF 578.417273
XPF 105.162912
YER 238.649503
ZAR 16.61355
ZMK 9001.202706
ZMW 18.024056
ZWL 321.999592
  • RYCEF

    -0.4700

    18.16

    -2.59%

  • NGG

    -0.1350

    81.435

    -0.17%

  • GSK

    -0.2600

    51.81

    -0.5%

  • RIO

    -1.2160

    94.364

    -1.29%

  • VOD

    -0.1250

    13.925

    -0.9%

  • RELX

    0.1450

    31.355

    +0.46%

  • BCE

    -0.0500

    22.99

    -0.22%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    22.14

    +0.14%

  • AZN

    2.4050

    183.425

    +1.31%

  • JRI

    0.0580

    12.688

    +0.46%

  • BCC

    4.2700

    76.07

    +5.61%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    21.97

    +0.05%

  • BTI

    0.3850

    61.125

    +0.63%

  • BP

    -1.1500

    38.18

    -3.01%

  • RBGPF

    0.9600

    61.3

    +1.57%

Brazil's Porto Alegre: a flood disaster waiting to happen
Brazil's Porto Alegre: a flood disaster waiting to happen / Photo: © AFP

Brazil's Porto Alegre: a flood disaster waiting to happen

Porto Alegre, the Brazilian metropolis left submerged after torrential rains, had been lulled into a "false sense" of security by a vast but aging system of flood defenses, an urban drainage engineer told AFP.

Text size:

Leomar Teichmann said a network of dikes, levees and a massive wall was meant to protect about 40 percent of the capital city of Rio Grande do Sul state in southern Brazil, where 150 people have died and hundreds of thousands were forced from their homes.

Teichmann is an engineering consultant and former deputy director of water and sewerage services for Porto Alegre, a city of 1.4 million people on the banks of the Guaiba estuary.

He told AFP he had already warned in 2019 that the city was at risk.

- What does system consist of? -

"The system was designed after floods in 1967 and built in the 1970s. It includes about 65 kilometers (40 miles) of dykes and a concrete wall of 2.67 km, as well as 14 floodgates and 22 storm water pumping stations.

"It was a simple system that seemed functional, since it guaranteed the protection of the urbanized part of Porto Alegre.

"However, it was never tested in practice until November 2023, because it was only on this occasion that the level of the Jacui River exceeded three meters (10 feet), which is the level of the Maua wall," leading to flooding, he explained.

"In other words, the system stood for 51 years without the water of the Jacui River ever touching the wall."

- Why did it fail with latest floods? -

"Gate Number 14 buckled under the great pressure of the water and began to leak with great volume and speed.

"The amount of water was so great that the nearby pumping stations were quickly flooded, causing the pumps to shut down.

"The flooding caused by the gate failure was so rapid that the entire region was flooded in a few hours.

"This flood eventually caused a power outage in the flooded areas, and as a result, all the pumping stations north of the Gasometer Plant stopped working," he said, referring to an out-of-service power plant.

"There were several failures in sequence. In about 24 hours, the water level on either side of the system was exactly the same."

- What were consequences of these failures? -

"Already in 2019, I stated that the protection system installed in Porto Alegre gave the population a false sense of protection and security, because there was no way to contain water in case of failure of any of the elements that make up this system.

"It is an old system, with many points subject to failure and requiring high investments in operation and maintenance.

"Much is said about Porto Alegre, but this same type of flood protection system was built in Canoas, Sao Leopoldo and Novo Hamburgo (other municipalities in the state) where the system was also overwhelmed by the water level.

"In all these cities the water very quickly invaded areas that should have been protected and caused greater tragedies than if the system did not exist."

Teichmann explained that water spilling over the dikes moved much faster than rising river levels.

"I'm not saying that dikes are useless, but with a flood of this size, as soon as the dikes were overcome by water, the speed with which water passed to the other side of these was much higher than if the dikes did not exist."

N.Lo--ThChM