The China Mail - Brazil's Porto Alegre: a flood disaster waiting to happen

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.000368
ALL 81.910403
AMD 376.168126
ANG 1.79008
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1431.790402
AUD 1.425923
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.654023
BBD 2.008288
BDT 121.941731
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.375999
BIF 2954.881813
BMD 1
BND 1.269737
BOB 6.889932
BRL 5.217404
BSD 0.997082
BTN 90.316715
BWP 13.200558
BYN 2.864561
BYR 19600
BZD 2.005328
CAD 1.36855
CDF 2200.000362
CHF 0.77566
CLF 0.021803
CLP 860.890396
CNY 6.93895
CNH 6.929815
COP 3684.65
CRC 494.312656
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.82504
CZK 20.504104
DJF 177.555076
DKK 6.322204
DOP 62.928665
DZD 129.553047
EGP 46.73094
ERN 15
ETB 155.0074
EUR 0.846204
FJD 2.209504
FKP 0.735067
GBP 0.734457
GEL 2.69504
GGP 0.735067
GHS 10.957757
GIP 0.735067
GMD 73.000355
GNF 8752.167111
GTQ 7.647681
GYD 208.609244
HKD 7.81385
HNL 26.45504
HRK 6.376104
HTG 130.618631
HUF 319.703831
IDR 16855.5
ILS 3.110675
IMP 0.735067
INR 90.57645
IQD 1310.5
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.710386
JEP 0.735067
JMD 156.057339
JOD 0.70904
JPY 157.200504
KES 128.622775
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4033.00035
KMF 419.00035
KPW 900.021111
KRW 1463.803789
KWD 0.30721
KYD 0.830902
KZT 493.331642
LAK 21426.698803
LBP 89293.839063
LKR 308.47816
LRD 187.449786
LSL 16.086092
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.314009
MAD 9.185039
MDL 17.000296
MGA 4426.402808
MKD 52.129054
MMK 2100.115486
MNT 3570.277081
MOP 8.023933
MRU 39.850379
MUR 46.060378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 17.263604
MYR 3.947504
MZN 63.750377
NAD 16.086092
NGN 1366.980377
NIO 36.694998
NOK 9.690604
NPR 144.506744
NZD 1.661958
OMR 0.383441
PAB 0.997082
PEN 3.367504
PGK 4.275868
PHP 58.511038
PKR 278.812127
PLN 3.56949
PYG 6588.016407
QAR 3.64135
RON 4.310404
RSD 99.553038
RUB 76.792845
RWF 1455.283522
SAR 3.749738
SBD 8.058149
SCR 13.675619
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.023204
SGD 1.272904
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.450371
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 568.818978
SRD 37.818038
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.719692
SVC 8.724259
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.08271
THB 31.535038
TJS 9.342721
TMT 3.505
TND 2.847504
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.612504
TTD 6.752083
TWD 31.590367
TZS 2577.445135
UAH 42.828111
UGX 3547.71872
UYU 38.538627
UZS 12244.069517
VES 377.985125
VND 25950
VUV 119.620171
WST 2.730723
XAF 554.743964
XAG 0.012866
XAU 0.000202
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.797032
XDR 0.689923
XOF 554.743964
XPF 101.703591
YER 238.403589
ZAR 16.04457
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.570764
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • BCC

    1.8700

    91.03

    +2.05%

  • NGG

    1.1700

    88.06

    +1.33%

  • CMSD

    0.0600

    23.95

    +0.25%

  • GSK

    1.0600

    60.23

    +1.76%

  • JRI

    0.0900

    12.97

    +0.69%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    23.51

    -0.17%

  • RYCEF

    0.2600

    16.88

    +1.54%

  • RIO

    2.2900

    93.41

    +2.45%

  • BCE

    -0.4900

    25.08

    -1.95%

  • RELX

    -0.7100

    29.38

    -2.42%

  • VOD

    0.4900

    15.11

    +3.24%

  • AZN

    5.8700

    193.03

    +3.04%

  • BTI

    0.8400

    62.8

    +1.34%

  • BP

    0.8400

    39.01

    +2.15%

Brazil's Porto Alegre: a flood disaster waiting to happen
Brazil's Porto Alegre: a flood disaster waiting to happen / Photo: © AFP

Brazil's Porto Alegre: a flood disaster waiting to happen

Porto Alegre, the Brazilian metropolis left submerged after torrential rains, had been lulled into a "false sense" of security by a vast but aging system of flood defenses, an urban drainage engineer told AFP.

Text size:

Leomar Teichmann said a network of dikes, levees and a massive wall was meant to protect about 40 percent of the capital city of Rio Grande do Sul state in southern Brazil, where 150 people have died and hundreds of thousands were forced from their homes.

Teichmann is an engineering consultant and former deputy director of water and sewerage services for Porto Alegre, a city of 1.4 million people on the banks of the Guaiba estuary.

He told AFP he had already warned in 2019 that the city was at risk.

- What does system consist of? -

"The system was designed after floods in 1967 and built in the 1970s. It includes about 65 kilometers (40 miles) of dykes and a concrete wall of 2.67 km, as well as 14 floodgates and 22 storm water pumping stations.

"It was a simple system that seemed functional, since it guaranteed the protection of the urbanized part of Porto Alegre.

"However, it was never tested in practice until November 2023, because it was only on this occasion that the level of the Jacui River exceeded three meters (10 feet), which is the level of the Maua wall," leading to flooding, he explained.

"In other words, the system stood for 51 years without the water of the Jacui River ever touching the wall."

- Why did it fail with latest floods? -

"Gate Number 14 buckled under the great pressure of the water and began to leak with great volume and speed.

"The amount of water was so great that the nearby pumping stations were quickly flooded, causing the pumps to shut down.

"The flooding caused by the gate failure was so rapid that the entire region was flooded in a few hours.

"This flood eventually caused a power outage in the flooded areas, and as a result, all the pumping stations north of the Gasometer Plant stopped working," he said, referring to an out-of-service power plant.

"There were several failures in sequence. In about 24 hours, the water level on either side of the system was exactly the same."

- What were consequences of these failures? -

"Already in 2019, I stated that the protection system installed in Porto Alegre gave the population a false sense of protection and security, because there was no way to contain water in case of failure of any of the elements that make up this system.

"It is an old system, with many points subject to failure and requiring high investments in operation and maintenance.

"Much is said about Porto Alegre, but this same type of flood protection system was built in Canoas, Sao Leopoldo and Novo Hamburgo (other municipalities in the state) where the system was also overwhelmed by the water level.

"In all these cities the water very quickly invaded areas that should have been protected and caused greater tragedies than if the system did not exist."

Teichmann explained that water spilling over the dikes moved much faster than rising river levels.

"I'm not saying that dikes are useless, but with a flood of this size, as soon as the dikes were overcome by water, the speed with which water passed to the other side of these was much higher than if the dikes did not exist."

N.Lo--ThChM