The China Mail - Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 63.502786
ALL 81.649774
AMD 368.210105
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.493505
ARS 1436.719047
AUD 1.415899
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.698139
BAM 1.685177
BBD 2.015096
BDT 122.817901
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.377101
BIF 2991
BMD 1
BND 1.281762
BOB 6.938712
BRL 5.103302
BSD 1.000526
BTN 94.560525
BWP 13.406112
BYN 2.76997
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012252
CAD 1.39983
CDF 2319.999903
CHF 0.79242
CLF 0.022506
CLP 885.760184
CNY 6.75745
CNH 6.757055
COP 3434.66
CRC 455.716489
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.350038
CZK 20.80495
DJF 177.719876
DKK 6.43765
DOP 58.60058
DZD 132.878618
EGP 50.219199
ERN 15
ETB 158.374949
EUR 0.86127
FJD 2.233701
FKP 0.744874
GBP 0.74475
GEL 2.645015
GGP 0.744874
GHS 11.293234
GIP 0.744874
GMD 73.000051
GNF 8777.496097
GTQ 7.626359
GYD 209.290102
HKD 7.833315
HNL 26.701565
HRK 6.488698
HTG 130.666299
HUF 300.973502
IDR 17746
ILS 2.915705
IMP 0.744874
INR 94.48745
IQD 1310
IRR 1375000.000195
ISK 124.380217
JEP 0.744874
JMD 158.238482
JOD 0.708993
JPY 160.328499
KES 129.460039
KGS 87.449893
KHR 4012.49985
KMF 425.000019
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1513.519947
KWD 0.30813
KYD 0.8338
KZT 487.920041
LAK 22029.999523
LBP 89550.000026
LKR 335.185855
LRD 182.150032
LSL 16.203129
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.604891
LYD 6.375025
MAD 9.244973
MDL 17.459223
MGA 4200.000011
MKD 53.088924
MMK 2099.401411
MNT 3576.563972
MOP 8.072446
MRU 40.080115
MUR 47.240073
MVR 15.459923
MWK 1735.999583
MXN 17.206425
MYR 4.068799
MZN 63.897688
NAD 16.207518
NGN 1359.39797
NIO 36.609603
NOK 9.472595
NPR 151.295881
NZD 1.715545
OMR 0.384502
PAB 1.000526
PEN 3.41251
PGK 4.38775
PHP 60.390949
PKR 278.294418
PLN 3.65065
PYG 6105.515298
QAR 3.640501
RON 4.505015
RSD 101.073983
RUB 72.497814
RWF 1488
SAR 3.751894
SBD 8.061424
SCR 13.488178
SDG 600.498557
SEK 9.357365
SGD 1.282021
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.749474
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.497411
SRD 37.331976
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.4
SVC 8.754244
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.198703
THB 32.545998
TJS 9.274765
TMT 3.51
TND 2.91175
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.316498
TTD 6.796543
TWD 31.546503
TZS 2619.998008
UAH 44.808889
UGX 3701.565583
UYU 40.393596
UZS 12005.000055
VES 596.036401
VND 26319.5
VUV 118.866954
WST 2.741216
XAF 565.192704
XAG 0.014245
XAU 0.000231
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803205
XDR 0.703697
XOF 565.000266
XPF 103.250334
YER 238.625011
ZAR 16.196735
ZMK 9001.19837
ZMW 17.684109
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0250

    22.365

    +0.11%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    12.81

    +0.23%

  • GSK

    -0.0100

    52.22

    -0.02%

  • BP

    -0.4400

    41.15

    -1.07%

  • BTI

    0.3200

    61.38

    +0.52%

  • NGG

    0.7100

    82.28

    +0.86%

  • AZN

    1.4400

    178.71

    +0.81%

  • BCE

    -0.2200

    23.82

    -0.92%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    105.74

    -0.14%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    71.56

    -0.04%

  • CMSD

    -0.0600

    22.26

    -0.27%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    62.87

    0%

  • RYCEF

    0.4800

    18.59

    +2.58%

  • VOD

    -0.1100

    14.89

    -0.74%

  • RELX

    -0.0400

    32.8

    -0.12%

Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers
Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers / Photo: © AFP

Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers

A new online voting system aimed at boosting turnout among the Philippines' millions of overseas workers ahead of Monday's mid-term elections has been marked by confusion and fears of disenfranchisement.

Text size:

Thousands of overseas Filipino workers, or OFWs, have already cast their ballots in the race dominated by a bitter feud between President Ferdinand Marcos and his impeached vice president Sara Duterte.

While official turnout figures are not yet publicly available, data from the Commission on Elections (Comelec) show at least 134,000 of the 1.22 million registered overseas voters have signed up for the new online system, which opened April 13.

But Jun Burlasa III, a Filipino working in Singapore, says he will not vote again if he has to do it online.

"I'd rather do manual," the 50-year-old told AFP this week, describing the new system as "confusing and suspicious".

At issue is a digital QR code generated after voting that leads users to a page asking them to verify their ballot has been submitted correctly. Below that is a box containing a jumble of computer code and candidate names.

Burlasa said many of the names visible were candidates for whom he had not voted.

Similar stories about the anxiety-inducing webpage have proliferated across social media, including Facebook posts that have reached thousands.

Eman Villanueva, a Hong Kong-based activist with migrant rights group BAYAN, said he was unsure his vote had been properly counted.

"There is absolutely no way for the voters to know if the votes that went through really reflected our choices," he said.

In previous overseas elections, voters could review the names they selected after the fact, but Comelec told AFP the QR code was never supposed to serve that purpose.

The landing page was only intended to verify a ballot's receipt, the commission said, adding that the name of every candidate running in the election should appear.

"We are definitely considering the feedback and studying how to incorporate them in future elections," Ian Geonanga, Comelec's director of overseas voting, told AFP.

Election watchdogs, however, say the commission failed to properly explain the new system and warn of the confusion risks disenfranchising voters.

"It's a natural reaction of people that if you're not familiar with the system, then you won't trust it the first instance," said Ona Caritos, executive director of the nonprofit Legal Network for Truthful Elections (Lente).

- ChatGPT, disinfo and 2028 -

Since April 14, 1.5 million people have watched a video in which a Philippines-based engineer named Jaydee San Juan quizzes ChatGPT about the names visible on the ballot verification page.

"It's highly likely showing the candidates that were selected/voted for using that ballot ID," the AI chatbot replied.

Comelec, however, got the opposite answer when conducting the ChatGPT experiment itself, Geonanga told AFP.

The election commission's efforts to quell fears about the new system, meanwhile, have been misrepresented to sow more disinformation.

AFP fact-checkers recently debunked a video edited to make it appear Geonanga was saying online ballots were "designed" to rig the election's results.

The fiasco has also left election watchdogs and migrant groups sceptical that the switch to online voting will boost turnout as intended.

Danilo Arao, convenor of voting watchdog Kontra Daya, said even a small change to the ballot's design might have helped assuage fears he believes could lead to "widespread disenfranchisement".

Lente's Caritos said losing trust in the online voting system could impact OFWs' participation in the 2028 presidential election.

“We don't want that, because if election results are not trusted by our voters, then it would go into the legitimacy of the government," she said. "It's a domino effect."

A.Kwok--ThChM