The China Mail - Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers

USD -
AED 3.672505
AFN 64.501933
ALL 81.192085
AMD 377.80312
ANG 1.79008
AOA 916.999824
ARS 1404.547301
AUD 1.402721
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.704253
BAM 1.646054
BBD 2.018668
BDT 122.599785
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.376984
BIF 2970.534519
BMD 1
BND 1.265307
BOB 6.925689
BRL 5.174398
BSD 1.00223
BTN 90.830132
BWP 13.131062
BYN 2.874696
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015696
CAD 1.355959
CDF 2225.000191
CHF 0.767297
CLF 0.02163
CLP 854.079852
CNY 6.91325
CNH 6.89644
COP 3673.06
CRC 495.722395
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 92.801205
CZK 20.4036
DJF 178.476144
DKK 6.286397
DOP 62.819558
DZD 129.575283
EGP 46.817602
ERN 15
ETB 155.585967
EUR 0.84143
FJD 2.184903
FKP 0.732521
GBP 0.73268
GEL 2.690042
GGP 0.732521
GHS 11.014278
GIP 0.732521
GMD 73.504205
GNF 8797.562638
GTQ 7.686513
GYD 209.681152
HKD 7.81592
HNL 26.485379
HRK 6.3408
HTG 131.354363
HUF 319.591498
IDR 16818
ILS 3.06674
IMP 0.732521
INR 90.591402
IQD 1312.932384
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.180396
JEP 0.732521
JMD 156.812577
JOD 0.709016
JPY 153.357501
KES 128.999719
KGS 87.450273
KHR 4038.176677
KMF 415.000205
KPW 899.988812
KRW 1437.340119
KWD 0.30672
KYD 0.835227
KZT 494.5042
LAK 21523.403145
LBP 89531.808073
LKR 310.020367
LRD 186.915337
LSL 15.915822
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.309703
MAD 9.134015
MDL 16.932406
MGA 4437.056831
MKD 51.896283
MMK 2100.304757
MNT 3579.516219
MOP 8.069569
MRU 39.799019
MUR 45.904195
MVR 15.45978
MWK 1737.88994
MXN 17.155475
MYR 3.902499
MZN 63.900568
NAD 15.916023
NGN 1354.820291
NIO 36.880244
NOK 9.46548
NPR 145.330825
NZD 1.646782
OMR 0.384501
PAB 1.002209
PEN 3.365049
PGK 4.301573
PHP 57.981
PKR 281.28012
PLN 3.54638
PYG 6618.637221
QAR 3.654061
RON 4.285002
RSD 98.738983
RUB 77.260217
RWF 1463.258625
SAR 3.750358
SBD 8.048395
SCR 13.877297
SDG 601.50433
SEK 8.87234
SGD 1.26085
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.249765
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 572.813655
SRD 37.776982
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.619945
SVC 8.769715
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 15.90934
THB 30.966972
TJS 9.410992
TMT 3.5
TND 2.881959
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.6499
TTD 6.79695
TWD 31.353008
TZS 2600.653975
UAH 43.122365
UGX 3543.21928
UYU 38.428359
UZS 12348.557217
VES 388.253525
VND 25960
VUV 119.359605
WST 2.711523
XAF 552.07568
XAG 0.012061
XAU 0.000198
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.806292
XDR 0.686599
XOF 552.073357
XPF 100.374109
YER 238.405751
ZAR 15.870075
ZMK 9001.201311
ZMW 19.067978
ZWL 321.999592
  • VOD

    -0.0200

    15.66

    -0.13%

  • CMSC

    0.0690

    23.759

    +0.29%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • RELX

    1.0950

    28.795

    +3.8%

  • GSK

    -0.3100

    58.2

    -0.53%

  • BTI

    -0.3900

    59.94

    -0.65%

  • AZN

    -1.0480

    203.315

    -0.52%

  • NGG

    0.6000

    91.25

    +0.66%

  • RIO

    0.3600

    99.85

    +0.36%

  • BP

    -0.8350

    37.69

    -2.22%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    13.1

    -0.08%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    24.08

    -0.17%

  • RYCEF

    -0.4800

    16.93

    -2.84%

  • BCC

    1.1450

    90.555

    +1.26%

  • BCE

    -0.0800

    25.565

    -0.31%

Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers
Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers / Photo: © AFP

Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers

A new online voting system aimed at boosting turnout among the Philippines' millions of overseas workers ahead of Monday's mid-term elections has been marked by confusion and fears of disenfranchisement.

Text size:

Thousands of overseas Filipino workers, or OFWs, have already cast their ballots in the race dominated by a bitter feud between President Ferdinand Marcos and his impeached vice president Sara Duterte.

While official turnout figures are not yet publicly available, data from the Commission on Elections (Comelec) show at least 134,000 of the 1.22 million registered overseas voters have signed up for the new online system, which opened April 13.

But Jun Burlasa III, a Filipino working in Singapore, says he will not vote again if he has to do it online.

"I'd rather do manual," the 50-year-old told AFP this week, describing the new system as "confusing and suspicious".

At issue is a digital QR code generated after voting that leads users to a page asking them to verify their ballot has been submitted correctly. Below that is a box containing a jumble of computer code and candidate names.

Burlasa said many of the names visible were candidates for whom he had not voted.

Similar stories about the anxiety-inducing webpage have proliferated across social media, including Facebook posts that have reached thousands.

Eman Villanueva, a Hong Kong-based activist with migrant rights group BAYAN, said he was unsure his vote had been properly counted.

"There is absolutely no way for the voters to know if the votes that went through really reflected our choices," he said.

In previous overseas elections, voters could review the names they selected after the fact, but Comelec told AFP the QR code was never supposed to serve that purpose.

The landing page was only intended to verify a ballot's receipt, the commission said, adding that the name of every candidate running in the election should appear.

"We are definitely considering the feedback and studying how to incorporate them in future elections," Ian Geonanga, Comelec's director of overseas voting, told AFP.

Election watchdogs, however, say the commission failed to properly explain the new system and warn of the confusion risks disenfranchising voters.

"It's a natural reaction of people that if you're not familiar with the system, then you won't trust it the first instance," said Ona Caritos, executive director of the nonprofit Legal Network for Truthful Elections (Lente).

- ChatGPT, disinfo and 2028 -

Since April 14, 1.5 million people have watched a video in which a Philippines-based engineer named Jaydee San Juan quizzes ChatGPT about the names visible on the ballot verification page.

"It's highly likely showing the candidates that were selected/voted for using that ballot ID," the AI chatbot replied.

Comelec, however, got the opposite answer when conducting the ChatGPT experiment itself, Geonanga told AFP.

The election commission's efforts to quell fears about the new system, meanwhile, have been misrepresented to sow more disinformation.

AFP fact-checkers recently debunked a video edited to make it appear Geonanga was saying online ballots were "designed" to rig the election's results.

The fiasco has also left election watchdogs and migrant groups sceptical that the switch to online voting will boost turnout as intended.

Danilo Arao, convenor of voting watchdog Kontra Daya, said even a small change to the ballot's design might have helped assuage fears he believes could lead to "widespread disenfranchisement".

Lente's Caritos said losing trust in the online voting system could impact OFWs' participation in the 2028 presidential election.

“We don't want that, because if election results are not trusted by our voters, then it would go into the legitimacy of the government," she said. "It's a domino effect."

A.Kwok--ThChM