The China Mail - In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 64.99959
ALL 80.761235
AMD 360.982284
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.999795
ARS 1547.4941
AUD 1.424725
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.703496
BAM 1.737655
BBD 2.013789
BDT 124.482471
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377511
BIF 2987.543757
BMD 1
BND 1.278142
BOB 12.12307
BRL 5.461698
BSD 0.999876
BTN 94.576825
BWP 13.727633
BYN 2.983457
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010946
CAD 1.395365
CDF 2315.000158
CHF 0.814045
CLF 0.024532
CLP 965.497729
CNY 6.67355
CNH 6.66769
COP 3229.4
CRC 454.196116
CUC 1
CUP 23.996482
CVE 97.96631
CZK 21.568402
DJF 178.04787
DKK 6.639715
DOP 60.044158
DZD 135.847037
EGP 54.720699
ERN 15
ETB 164.108289
EUR 0.888299
FJD 2.24025
FKP 0.745268
GBP 0.741285
GEL 2.597406
GGP 0.745268
GHS 11.633527
GIP 0.745268
GMD 74.000152
GNF 8857.12128
GTQ 7.640777
GYD 209.490556
HKD 7.84374
HNL 26.874159
HRK 6.76901
HTG 130.993736
HUF 321.820972
IDR 18089.05
ILS 3.153904
IMP 0.745268
INR 94.292795
IQD 1515.805747
IRR 1883408.497579
ISK 121.350142
JEP 0.745268
JMD 158.490264
JOD 0.709023
JPY 157.906976
KES 129.939873
KGS 87.450338
KHR 4065.567945
KMF 440.999846
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1344.389738
KWD 0.31072
KYD 0.8332
KZT 451.907529
LAK 22510.972511
LBP 89536.844537
LKR 332.702525
LRD 169.971747
LSL 16.458322
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.411145
MAD 9.767223
MDL 17.932726
MGA 4516.054516
MKD 54.694998
MMK 2099.52083
MNT 3598.087189
MOP 8.0795
MRU 40.672394
MUR 47.089769
MVR 15.454964
MWK 1733.74558
MXN 18.549496
MYR 4.049303
MZN 63.909535
NAD 16.458322
NGN 1345.80733
NIO 36.791229
NOK 9.290185
NPR 151.327626
NZD 1.769895
OMR 0.384494
PAB 0.999964
PEN 3.451055
PGK 4.486835
PHP 63.136501
PKR 276.584484
PLN 3.896245
PYG 6062.867601
QAR 3.645272
RON 4.745298
RSD 104.493047
RUB 81.798631
RWF 1471.300315
SAR 3.756339
SBD 8.051718
SCR 13.898677
SDG 601.501901
SEK 9.70178
SGD 1.276795
SHP 0.745545
SLE 22.910107
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.481881
SRD 37.56398
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.767813
SVC 8.74869
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.449882
THB 33.443033
TJS 9.223662
TMT 3.51
TND 2.979992
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.042497
TTD 6.77808
TWD 32.955404
TZS 2649.997953
UAH 45.533522
UGX 4104.696412
UYU 40.202925
UZS 11888.515735
VES 890.036604
VND 25690
VUV 119.472328
WST 2.779309
XAF 582.685991
XAG 0.018789
XAU 0.000241577987
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801979
XDR 0.707052
XOF 582.685991
XPF 105.958029
YER 236.174995
ZAR 16.332032
ZMK 9001.185115
ZMW 20.278266
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.96484
MXV 2.087959
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels
In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels / Photo: © AFP/File

In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels

Europe is taking longer than planned to concoct an EU-wide food-labelling system after a colour-coded scheme created in France did not go down well in culinary rival Italy.

Text size:

Fearing that cultural icons such as olive oil or Parmesan cheese would get bad grades, Italy successfully rallied other European Union nations to reject the French system.

The European Commission was supposed to come up by late 2022 with a label aimed at helping consumer make healthier food choices.

France's Nutri-Score system was initially seen as the front-runner to be used across the 27-nation EU. The front-of-pack nutrition label has already been adopted by Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Spain.

Nutri-Score ranks food products on a green-to-red and A-to-E scale based on their nutritional value, from containing a good amount of protein or fibre to too much salt or saturated fat, but companies are not obligated to use the label.

Some 270 scientists signed a call in March 2021 urging the European Commission "not to yield to pressure groups" and back Nutri-Score, saying it was the only label that had undergone peer-reviews showing its "effectiveness and relevance to consumers and public health".

But the European Commission decided against Nutri-Score, with its deputy director-general of food sustainability, Claire Bury, saying in September that it would not put on the table something that "polarizes the debates".

- 'E' for cheese -

Italy, Cyprus, Greece, the Czech Republic, Romania and Hungary opposed the French system.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who took office in October, had lambasted such food labels as "discriminatory and penalising" for the country's food industry.

"An intensive lobbying campaign against this tool by commercial interests has regrettably muddied the waters and turned a public health debate into a political one," said Emma Calvert, senior food policy officer at European consumers group BEUC.

While the European Commission may still use Nutri-Score for inspiration in devising a system, it is also looking at other labels.

Those include the green or black "Keyhole" system in Nordic countries and one backed by Italy, NutrInform Battery, which takes into account the potential portions of food consumed.

Italy has argued that Nutri-Score is not a good reference because it is based on 100 grams or 100 millilitres of food while certain products such as oil and cheese are consumed in smaller quantities.

Rome worries that labels would be harmful to products that are staples of its Mediterranean diet, including olive oil, cheese, prosciutto and pizza.

Italy's main agriculture association, Coldiretti, has said that Nutri-Score ends up "excluding healthy and natural foods that have been at the table for centuries in favour of artificial products".

In France, the makers of the blue cheese Bleu d'Auvergne refuse to put the label their product, which would get the worst possible grade, a red E, for its salt and fat content.

"How do you explain that Bleu d'Auvergne is classified as E when chips made in oil get an A," said Sebastien Ramade, president of the Auvergne cheese association.

But 875 brands representing 60 percent of the food market in France are using Nutri-Score, the system's founder, nutritionist Serge Hercberg told AFP.

"Some major brands still reject it, but more and more manufacturers are adopting it, some of whom had strongly resisted it in the past," Hercberg said.

"When we look at sales figures, we see that it works and it has had an effect on the reformulation and the improvement of the recipes for thousands of products," he added.

- Chile's strict label -

Time is running short for the commission to propose a label to EU states before the term of the current European Parliament expires next year.

"If the Commission fails to uphold its commitment to propose a mandatory EU-wide front-of-pack nutrition label it will be a major missed opportunity to help European consumers, especially vulnerable ones, to make the healthier choice in the supermarket," Calvert said.

Some members of the European Parliament say artificial foods should be targeted instead.

"The overweight issue among teenagers is not due to eating too much Camembert," said MEP Irene Tolleret.

Elsewhere in the world, Chile has had an even stricter system since 2016, with a black label that warns consumers about high saturated fats, sugar or salt.

Products in Chile that bear the label are barred from advertising on television.

"One of the consequences is that more than 20 percent of products have new formulas," with less salt or sugar, said Guido Girardi, a former senator behind the system who added that similar legislation is in the works in 32 countries.

X.So--ThChM