The China Mail - Censorship or evolution? 'Sensitivity readers' divide publishing world

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 64.99959
ALL 80.761235
AMD 360.982284
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.999795
ARS 1547.4941
AUD 1.424725
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.703496
BAM 1.737655
BBD 2.013789
BDT 124.482471
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377511
BIF 2987.543757
BMD 1
BND 1.278142
BOB 12.12307
BRL 5.461698
BSD 0.999876
BTN 94.576825
BWP 13.727633
BYN 2.983457
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010946
CAD 1.395365
CDF 2315.000158
CHF 0.814045
CLF 0.024532
CLP 965.497729
CNY 6.67355
CNH 6.66769
COP 3229.4
CRC 454.196116
CUC 1
CUP 23.996482
CVE 97.96631
CZK 21.568402
DJF 178.04787
DKK 6.639715
DOP 60.044158
DZD 135.847037
EGP 54.720699
ERN 15
ETB 164.108289
EUR 0.888299
FJD 2.24025
FKP 0.745268
GBP 0.741285
GEL 2.597406
GGP 0.745268
GHS 11.633527
GIP 0.745268
GMD 74.000152
GNF 8857.12128
GTQ 7.640777
GYD 209.490556
HKD 7.84374
HNL 26.874159
HRK 6.76901
HTG 130.993736
HUF 321.820972
IDR 18089.05
ILS 3.153904
IMP 0.745268
INR 94.292795
IQD 1515.805747
IRR 1883408.497579
ISK 121.350142
JEP 0.745268
JMD 158.490264
JOD 0.709023
JPY 157.906976
KES 129.939873
KGS 87.450338
KHR 4065.567945
KMF 440.999846
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1344.389738
KWD 0.31072
KYD 0.8332
KZT 451.907529
LAK 22510.972511
LBP 89536.844537
LKR 332.702525
LRD 169.971747
LSL 16.458322
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.411145
MAD 9.767223
MDL 17.932726
MGA 4516.054516
MKD 54.694998
MMK 2099.52083
MNT 3598.087189
MOP 8.0795
MRU 40.672394
MUR 47.089769
MVR 15.454964
MWK 1733.74558
MXN 18.549496
MYR 4.049303
MZN 63.909535
NAD 16.458322
NGN 1345.80733
NIO 36.791229
NOK 9.290185
NPR 151.327626
NZD 1.769895
OMR 0.384494
PAB 0.999964
PEN 3.451055
PGK 4.486835
PHP 63.136501
PKR 276.584484
PLN 3.896245
PYG 6062.867601
QAR 3.645272
RON 4.745298
RSD 104.493047
RUB 81.798631
RWF 1471.300315
SAR 3.756339
SBD 8.051718
SCR 13.898677
SDG 601.501901
SEK 9.70178
SGD 1.276795
SHP 0.745545
SLE 22.910107
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.481881
SRD 37.56398
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.767813
SVC 8.74869
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.449882
THB 33.443033
TJS 9.223662
TMT 3.51
TND 2.979992
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.042497
TTD 6.77808
TWD 32.955404
TZS 2649.997953
UAH 45.533522
UGX 4104.696412
UYU 40.202925
UZS 11888.515735
VES 890.036604
VND 25690
VUV 119.472328
WST 2.779309
XAF 582.685991
XAG 0.018789
XAU 0.000241577987
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801979
XDR 0.707052
XOF 582.685991
XPF 105.958029
YER 236.174995
ZAR 16.332032
ZMK 9001.185115
ZMW 20.278266
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.96484
MXV 2.087959
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Censorship or evolution? 'Sensitivity readers' divide publishing world
Censorship or evolution? 'Sensitivity readers' divide publishing world / Photo: © GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP/File

Censorship or evolution? 'Sensitivity readers' divide publishing world

It's a profession which is increasingly under the spotlight as the culture wars rumble on: "sensitivity readers" -- editors who identify insensitivities or stereotypes in manuscripts -- are becoming a lightning rod for the publishing industry.

Text size:

Such readers have worked in the wings of the Western literary world for years now, though they were largely confined to children's literature.

But amid social reckonings such as the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements, sensitivity readers are becoming prominent in contemporary fiction publishing also -- and not everyone is pleased about it.

Publishers "are doing a damn good job, trying to ruin our books, and to ruin our fun as readers," the American author of "We Need To Talk About Kevin," Lionel Shriver, complained on ultra-conservative British channel GB News last month.

Sensitivity readers have recently been pilloried again with the announcement that books by children's writer Roald Dahl and Ian Fleming, the author of the James Bond novels, were being republished to be more adapted to current sensibilities.

In Dahl's books, for example, some characters are no longer identified as "fat" or "crazy." Fleming's books were being reissued with racial references -- including the N-word -- removed.

Accusations of censorship began flying almost immediately from observers who fear sanitized literature could whitewash the past as well as the present.

"People say that, but I don't feel that they understand the process," Patrice Williams Marks, a Los Angeles-based sensitivity reader, tells AFP.

"If you're writing about a people or community that you're unfamiliar with, and you want it to be authentic... then you find somebody who's a sensitivity reader who's part of that community and ask for their opinions," she explains.

"I always let them know that they don't have to accept the changes that I suggest," says Lola Isabel Gonzalez, another sensitivity reader, also based in Los Angeles.

- Modern censors? -

So who are "sensitivity readers"?

Mostly they are freelance editors, often paid by the word or number of pages -- and with strict confidentiality clauses, of course -- by authors or publishers concerned about the accuracy of their manuscripts.

Or, as critics charge, to avoid at all costs the disaster of being canceled in a social media storm over a faux pas.

The proofreaders often list their areas of expertise: "child of immigrants," "bisexual," "autistic," "hijabi," "deaf," "expertise in both mainland Chinese and Hong Kong culture" and so on.

"There are good reasons for regulating children's reading: it is foundational and formational," British author Kate Clanchy wrote last year.

But she is much more circumspect when it comes to adults.

Adults "are able to put books down if they upset them, so their books may safely contain difficult ideas," argues Clanchy, who was herself at the center of a sensitivity reader controversy when her memoir was accused of being racist and insensitive.

For Shriver, who has long complained about such readers, they are nothing less than "sensitivity police."

"At the keyboard, unrelenting anguish about hurting other people's feelings inhibits spontaneity and constipates creativity," she wrote in The Guardian newspaper in 2017.

In France, a country widely resistant to this type of revisionism, the essayist Raphael Enthoven in 2020 denounced these "modern censors" as "the vanguard of the Identity Plague."

- Progress -

But many other writers are in favor of readers -- like the American Adele Holmes, who called on Marks's services for her first book, "Winter's Reckoning."

"Patrice was able to point out some areas of white privilege and the white savior role," Holmes told AFP.

And, more prosaically, for the character of a Black woman described as having "silky" hair, Marks suggested using the word "coil" instead, to make it more realistic.

Holmes feels that the proofreader helped her "immensely."

As for the criticisms, she argues they come from people who feel "threatened" by minorities, in a publishing world long known to be predominantly white.

For her part, Marks dates the renewed interest in her profession to the 2020 killing of George Floyd, an African American man, by a white police officer in Minneapolis. The murder ignited protests and a social reckoning on modern racism in the United States and around the world.

Since then, authors have "become more conscious of the lens that they're looking through," Marks told AFP.

Gonzalez also sees this increased care as reflecting social evolution.

"I don't think I could have done it professionally in any other decade," she says of her job, welcoming the fact that "Generation Z" is challenging established social narratives.

Those younger generations understand the importance of sensitivity reading, she argues -- as opposed to their elders, who might "have a harder time seeing it as progress."

O.Yip--ThChM