The China Mail - FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 64.999981
ALL 81.290987
AMD 361.508883
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000388
ARS 1540.7425
AUD 1.424035
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.701015
BAM 1.750964
BBD 2.018487
BDT 124.174112
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.378161
BIF 2998.804883
BMD 1
BND 1.283118
BOB 11.881091
BRL 5.372502
BSD 1.002171
BTN 95.340582
BWP 13.824839
BYN 2.947962
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015623
CAD 1.40215
CDF 2315.000041
CHF 0.828045
CLF 0.025072
CLP 989.970057
CNY 6.668349
CNH 6.66705
COP 3151.48
CRC 456.22815
CUC 1
CUP 24.052571
CVE 98.716635
CZK 21.818402
DJF 178.464155
DKK 6.69413
DOP 61.334754
DZD 135.179662
EGP 56.270497
ERN 15
ETB 164.149508
EUR 0.89559
FJD 2.252803
FKP 0.749223
GBP 0.750185
GEL 2.593026
GGP 0.749223
GHS 11.650477
GIP 0.749223
GMD 74.000108
GNF 8869.33245
GTQ 7.660801
GYD 210.009401
HKD 7.844798
HNL 26.905998
HRK 6.747298
HTG 131.259372
HUF 328.790021
IDR 18141
ILS 3.07395
IMP 0.749223
INR 95.12265
IQD 1518.276797
IRR 1817007.448579
ISK 122.129988
JEP 0.749223
JMD 159.104745
JOD 0.709014
JPY 157.745042
KES 129.960006
KGS 87.449807
KHR 4085.853047
KMF 440.999499
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1323.359603
KWD 0.31074
KYD 0.835191
KZT 451.928844
LAK 22555.260119
LBP 89745.428501
LKR 332.999096
LRD 170.369342
LSL 16.666667
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.426285
MAD 9.843821
MDL 18.009114
MGA 4551.579042
MKD 55.126076
MMK 2099.77173
MNT 3599.40728
MOP 8.098551
MRU 40.299196
MUR 47.319807
MVR 15.450125
MWK 1737.818662
MXN 18.56135
MYR 4.086797
MZN 63.909798
NAD 16.666667
NGN 1339.930089
NIO 36.876055
NOK 9.31888
NPR 152.544573
NZD 1.75656
OMR 0.384503
PAB 1.002162
PEN 3.454941
PGK 4.55866
PHP 64.022498
PKR 277.328857
PLN 3.944375
PYG 5777.21077
QAR 3.663433
RON 4.786969
RSD 105.227024
RUB 80.800387
RWF 1481.736795
SAR 3.745151
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.909586
SDG 601.500431
SEK 9.95525
SGD 1.28114
SHP 0.749344
SLE 22.949849
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 572.694718
SRD 37.691995
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.933849
SVC 8.769103
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.661071
THB 33.742983
TJS 9.245066
TMT 3.5
TND 2.993684
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.783097
TTD 6.811284
TWD 32.526501
TZS 2645.000111
UAH 45.754918
UGX 4489.905546
UYU 40.188543
UZS 11994.001656
VES 859.934966
VND 25829.5
VUV 118.743227
WST 2.764729
XAF 587.468469
XAG 0.018786
XAU 0.000249471744
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.806193
XDR 0.707052
XOF 587.468469
XPF 106.770519
YER 236.149983
ZAR 16.641085
ZMK 9001.202587
ZMW 20.178607
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.701932
MXV 2.093571
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks
FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks

FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks

The aggressive mobilisation of Foreign Currency Non-Resident Bank [FCNR(B)] deposits increasingly weighed on bank margins during the September quarter, with private lenders bearing a disproportionate impact owing to their larger participation in the RBI’s FCNR(B) drive.

Text size:

The aggressive mobilisation of Foreign Currency Non-Resident Bank [FCNR(B)] deposits increasingly weighed on bank margins during the September quarter, with private lenders bearing a disproportionate impact owing to their larger participation in the RBI’s FCNR(B) drive.

A comparison of the September quarter earnings shows that private banks, despite reporting stronger loan and deposit growth, witnessed sharper compression in net interest margins (NIMs) than most public sector peers.

Among private banks, Kotak Mahindra Bank reported the steepest decline, with NIM falling 44 basis points year-on-year to 4.1%. Axis Bank’s NIM declined 37 basis points to 3.36%, while ICICI Bank’s margin slipped 12 basis points to 4.18%. HDFC Bank, the largest private lender, recorded a 14 basis point decline in NIM to 3.16%.

PSU resilience

In contrast, PSU banks displayed greater resilience. Union Bank of India reported NIM expansion of 19 basis points to 2.86%, while Central Bank of India’s margin improved 12 basis points to 3.01%. Bank of India’s NIM declined by a modest six basis points to 2.41%.

“The impact has been far more pronounced for private banks because their FCNR(B) mobilisation was significantly higher relative to their existing deposit base. While PSU banks mobilised FCNR(B) deposits equivalent to roughly 2-2.5% of deposits, private lenders such as ICICI Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank and Axis Bank raised FCNR(B) deposits amounting to about 7.5-10% of their deposit base. As a result, a larger pool of funds remained parked in lower-yielding assets pending deployment, leading to greater pressure on margins.” said Siddharth Rajpurohit, Lead Analyst - Banking and non-lending financials, Systematix Group.

“FCNR(B) inflows created a near-term pressure on margins as we carried excess liquidity during the quarter, said Ashok Vaswani, MD & CEO, Kotak Mahindra Bank during the media call. “The funds have been used to replace costlier borrowings and support growth opportunities. As the remaining liquidity is deployed into higher-yielding assets and repo-linked loans are repriced, we expect the margin impact to gradually moderate while NIMs remain broadly stable through the second half of the year,” he said.

Anshul Chandak, Head Treasury, RBL Bank, said the margin impact is temporary and reflects the cost of raising and hedging these deposits before they are fully deployed.

“From next quarter, you will start seeing improvement in NIMs,” Chandak said. He noted while FCNR(B) deposits initially weigh on margins because of their cost structure, the drag should ease as banks deploy the funds and balance sheets adjust.

Narrowing gap

For most banks, the impact is projected to normalise by the December quarter. However, lenders that raised FCNR(B) deposits disproportionately relative to their balance-sheet size could take longer to absorb the costs. Analysts expect the gap to narrow over the next two quarters as FCNR(B) funds are deployed and hedging costs stabilise. Until then, the banks that led the FCNR(B) mobilisation drive are likely to continue reporting a greater impact on margins than their state-owned peers.

“The FCNR(B)-related drag on margins is temporary,” said Rajpurohit. “Some impact could still persist in the December quarter as banks continue deploying these funds, but the pressure should start easing as the excess liquidity is put to work and repo-rate transmission normalises. By the fourth quarter, margins should largely stabilise, with the benefits of asset repricing and improved deployment of FCNR(B) funds helping offset the earlier drag,” he said.

B.Carter--ThChM