The China Mail - British court spares Shell in climate case

USD -
AED 3.672497
AFN 66.272138
ALL 83.49892
AMD 382.462203
ANG 1.789982
AOA 916.999915
ARS 1407.757959
AUD 1.538911
AWG 1.805
AZN 1.701711
BAM 1.689676
BBD 2.011145
BDT 121.87473
BGN 1.689676
BHD 0.373737
BIF 2940.647948
BMD 1
BND 1.300389
BOB 6.909719
BRL 5.332401
BSD 0.998531
BTN 88.502808
BWP 13.406479
BYN 3.40311
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008207
CAD 1.40457
CDF 2150.000335
CHF 0.807075
CLF 0.024015
CLP 942.090713
CNY 7.11935
CNH 7.12528
COP 3780.302376
CRC 501.339093
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.261339
CZK 21.060971
DJF 177.814255
DKK 6.46657
DOP 64.155508
DZD 129.316631
EGP 47.041964
ERN 15
ETB 154.143499
EUR 0.866032
FJD 2.28425
FKP 0.760233
GBP 0.76117
GEL 2.704996
GGP 0.760233
GHS 10.919222
GIP 0.760233
GMD 73.000146
GNF 8667.818575
GTQ 7.651836
GYD 208.907127
HKD 7.77694
HNL 26.25486
HRK 6.524904
HTG 132.907127
HUF 332.998498
IDR 16685.5
ILS 3.2539
IMP 0.760233
INR 88.6655
IQD 1308.077754
IRR 42099.999784
ISK 126.580158
JEP 0.760233
JMD 160.267819
JOD 0.708962
JPY 153.680502
KES 129.209503
KGS 87.450283
KHR 4019.006479
KMF 421.000041
KPW 900.018268
KRW 1455.999659
KWD 0.306901
KYD 0.832138
KZT 524.198704
LAK 21680.345572
LBP 89418.488121
LKR 304.354212
LRD 182.332613
LSL 17.296674
LTL 2.952741
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.452268
MAD 9.256069
MDL 17.024622
MGA 4488.12095
MKD 53.153348
MMK 2099.87471
MNT 3580.787673
MOP 7.998963
MRU 39.553348
MUR 45.91021
MVR 15.404967
MWK 1731.490281
MXN 18.44925
MYR 4.176023
MZN 63.949777
NAD 17.296674
NGN 1435.999931
NIO 36.742981
NOK 10.168161
NPR 141.60432
NZD 1.778821
OMR 0.38114
PAB 0.998618
PEN 3.369762
PGK 4.215983
PHP 58.8055
PKR 282.349719
PLN 3.669695
PYG 7065.226782
QAR 3.639309
RON 4.398798
RSD 101.226782
RUB 81.112198
RWF 1450.885529
SAR 3.750398
SBD 8.230592
SCR 13.701253
SDG 600.50141
SEK 9.543485
SGD 1.302385
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.205474
SLL 20969.499529
SOS 570.62635
SRD 38.598981
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.166307
SVC 8.736933
SYP 11056.858374
SZL 17.302808
THB 32.395016
TJS 9.216415
TMT 3.51
TND 2.95162
TOP 2.342104
TRY 42.241395
TTD 6.768898
TWD 30.981803
TZS 2456.414687
UAH 41.870929
UGX 3494.600432
UYU 39.766739
UZS 12042.332613
VES 228.193974
VND 26310
VUV 122.303025
WST 2.820887
XAF 566.701512
XAG 0.020585
XAU 0.000249
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.799568
XDR 0.704795
XOF 566.701512
XPF 103.032397
YER 238.495399
ZAR 17.3198
ZMK 9001.197729
ZMW 22.591793
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSD

    0.0900

    24.1

    +0.37%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    13.74

    -0.07%

  • SCS

    0.0000

    15.76

    0%

  • RIO

    0.0600

    69.33

    +0.09%

  • GSK

    -0.4700

    46.63

    -1.01%

  • RBGPF

    -0.7800

    75.22

    -1.04%

  • BCC

    -0.0900

    70.64

    -0.13%

  • NGG

    1.4600

    77.75

    +1.88%

  • BCE

    0.0200

    23.19

    +0.09%

  • CMSC

    0.0700

    23.85

    +0.29%

  • RELX

    -1.1200

    42.27

    -2.65%

  • AZN

    0.8100

    84.58

    +0.96%

  • VOD

    0.2400

    11.58

    +2.07%

  • BTI

    0.3800

    54.59

    +0.7%

  • BP

    0.7600

    36.58

    +2.08%

  • RYCEF

    0.0800

    14.88

    +0.54%

British court spares Shell in climate case
British court spares Shell in climate case / Photo: © AFP/File

British court spares Shell in climate case

A British court dismissed a lawsuit that accused Shell's leadership of mismanaging climate risks to the oil giant on Monday, but the activist investor group that brought it plans to appeal.

Text size:

Corporations have faced a growing number of climate-related lawsuits in recent years as they come under pressure to step up efforts to curb global warming.

Shell was already ordered by a Dutch court in 2021 to slash its greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent by the end of the decade after it was sued by environmental groups.

This time, ClientEarth, an environmental law NGO and a minor Shell shareholder, filed in February a lawsuit in the High Court of England and Wales against Shell bosses "for failing to manage the material and foreseeable risks posed to the company by climate change".

But the judges dismissed the case, once in May and now following a hearing earlier in July.

ClientEarth said it was disappointed by the dismissal and plans to appeal.

A Shell spokesperson said the dismissal was "the right outcome –- the court has reaffirmed its decision that this claim is fundamentally flawed".

The company said ClientEarth's "claim entirely ignores how directors of a business as large and complex as Shell must balance a range of competing considerations".

At its annual shareholders meeting in May, Shell's management received majority backing even though there were disruptions and doubts expressed about its climate transition.

Shell later announced a change of plans: instead of gradually reducing oil output it would hold it steady until 2030.

"The Board's strategy to manage the risks of the energy transition was fundamentally flawed as it was," said ClientEarth senior lawyer Paul Benson.

"Now the Board seems to be dropping even any pretence that it will take meaningful action," he added in a statement.

ClientEarth says Shell's flawed climate strategy is inconsistent with the Paris Agreement and jeopardises the company's future commercial success, and thus constitutes a breach of its legal duties under English company law.

"The Board's refusal to take decisive action to prepare the company for the fast-advancing energy transition puts Shell’s future commercial viability at risk," said Benson.

According to ClientEarth, this is the first time a company's board has been targeted by a lawsuit for failing to properly handle the climate transition.

Shell's first-quarter net profit surged 22 percent to $8.7 billion but has indicated its second quarter performance has been hit by a drop in gas sales.

D.Wang--ThChM