The China Mail - British court spares Shell in climate case

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 68.590566
ALL 83.623903
AMD 385.112098
ANG 1.789783
AOA 916.999839
ARS 1314.477406
AUD 1.556251
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.706089
BAM 1.683886
BBD 2.020052
BDT 122.033957
BGN 1.683165
BHD 0.377024
BIF 2991.472491
BMD 1
BND 1.290792
BOB 6.930812
BRL 5.469361
BSD 1.002919
BTN 87.469436
BWP 13.494445
BYN 3.377456
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012139
CAD 1.391045
CDF 2864.99984
CHF 0.80927
CLF 0.02475
CLP 970.92987
CNY 7.180395
CNH 7.185169
COP 4034.45
CRC 506.056667
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.934911
CZK 21.173299
DJF 178.595105
DKK 6.43004
DOP 62.271315
DZD 129.919117
EGP 48.483465
ERN 15
ETB 141.78729
EUR 0.86143
FJD 2.27385
FKP 0.74349
GBP 0.74545
GEL 2.69498
GGP 0.74349
GHS 11.032476
GIP 0.74349
GMD 71.99975
GNF 8694.566649
GTQ 7.691049
GYD 209.835727
HKD 7.814205
HNL 26.235972
HRK 6.490403
HTG 131.231517
HUF 341.340496
IDR 16320.4
ILS 3.410168
IMP 0.74349
INR 87.30795
IQD 1313.668767
IRR 42050.000228
ISK 123.530183
JEP 0.74349
JMD 161.183262
JOD 0.70899
JPY 148.497498
KES 129.580016
KGS 87.447975
KHR 4020.541783
KMF 422.500338
KPW 900.00801
KRW 1395.080038
KWD 0.30593
KYD 0.835823
KZT 539.109248
LAK 21739.523471
LBP 90249.37044
LKR 302.757151
LRD 201.096876
LSL 17.753748
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.442054
MAD 9.047939
MDL 16.884554
MGA 4420.931194
MKD 52.984124
MMK 2098.932841
MNT 3596.07368
MOP 8.07177
MRU 40.036848
MUR 45.739785
MVR 15.410085
MWK 1739.093003
MXN 18.749898
MYR 4.230497
MZN 63.90111
NAD 17.754436
NGN 1539.389785
NIO 36.908375
NOK 10.186945
NPR 139.944126
NZD 1.71876
OMR 0.384502
PAB 1.002945
PEN 3.500017
PGK 4.239236
PHP 57.045952
PKR 284.559238
PLN 3.66565
PYG 7247.462355
QAR 3.655595
RON 4.353399
RSD 100.952015
RUB 80.575741
RWF 1451.712189
SAR 3.752745
SBD 8.217016
SCR 14.130763
SDG 600.494877
SEK 9.621315
SGD 1.288845
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.301869
SLL 20969.49797
SOS 573.209474
SRD 37.979887
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.092869
SVC 8.775872
SYP 13001.955997
SZL 17.75878
THB 32.664971
TJS 9.427885
TMT 3.5
TND 2.936082
TOP 2.342103
TRY 41.010398
TTD 6.796413
TWD 30.551298
TZS 2490.884989
UAH 41.318531
UGX 3575.610428
UYU 40.327858
UZS 12503.013397
VES 137.956899
VND 26417
VUV 119.91017
WST 2.707396
XAF 564.737737
XAG 0.026244
XAU 0.0003
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.807608
XDR 0.702356
XOF 564.74503
XPF 102.67934
YER 240.198816
ZAR 17.715845
ZMK 9001.196762
ZMW 23.193185
ZWL 321.999592
  • JRI

    0.0000

    13.33

    0%

  • SCS

    -0.0800

    16.1

    -0.5%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    25.72

    -0.08%

  • RBGPF

    0.6500

    73.92

    +0.88%

  • AZN

    -0.0600

    80.46

    -0.07%

  • BCC

    0.1700

    84.67

    +0.2%

  • GSK

    0.0100

    40.08

    +0.02%

  • RIO

    0.6800

    61.3

    +1.11%

  • CMSC

    0.0100

    23.45

    +0.04%

  • NGG

    -0.6500

    71.43

    -0.91%

  • BTI

    0.2600

    59.27

    +0.44%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    23.71

    +0.08%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    11.86

    -0.34%

  • RELX

    -0.5000

    48.19

    -1.04%

  • RYCEF

    0.3400

    14.16

    +2.4%

  • BP

    0.1700

    34.05

    +0.5%

British court spares Shell in climate case
British court spares Shell in climate case / Photo: © AFP/File

British court spares Shell in climate case

A British court dismissed a lawsuit that accused Shell's leadership of mismanaging climate risks to the oil giant on Monday, but the activist investor group that brought it plans to appeal.

Text size:

Corporations have faced a growing number of climate-related lawsuits in recent years as they come under pressure to step up efforts to curb global warming.

Shell was already ordered by a Dutch court in 2021 to slash its greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent by the end of the decade after it was sued by environmental groups.

This time, ClientEarth, an environmental law NGO and a minor Shell shareholder, filed in February a lawsuit in the High Court of England and Wales against Shell bosses "for failing to manage the material and foreseeable risks posed to the company by climate change".

But the judges dismissed the case, once in May and now following a hearing earlier in July.

ClientEarth said it was disappointed by the dismissal and plans to appeal.

A Shell spokesperson said the dismissal was "the right outcome –- the court has reaffirmed its decision that this claim is fundamentally flawed".

The company said ClientEarth's "claim entirely ignores how directors of a business as large and complex as Shell must balance a range of competing considerations".

At its annual shareholders meeting in May, Shell's management received majority backing even though there were disruptions and doubts expressed about its climate transition.

Shell later announced a change of plans: instead of gradually reducing oil output it would hold it steady until 2030.

"The Board's strategy to manage the risks of the energy transition was fundamentally flawed as it was," said ClientEarth senior lawyer Paul Benson.

"Now the Board seems to be dropping even any pretence that it will take meaningful action," he added in a statement.

ClientEarth says Shell's flawed climate strategy is inconsistent with the Paris Agreement and jeopardises the company's future commercial success, and thus constitutes a breach of its legal duties under English company law.

"The Board's refusal to take decisive action to prepare the company for the fast-advancing energy transition puts Shell’s future commercial viability at risk," said Benson.

According to ClientEarth, this is the first time a company's board has been targeted by a lawsuit for failing to properly handle the climate transition.

Shell's first-quarter net profit surged 22 percent to $8.7 billion but has indicated its second quarter performance has been hit by a drop in gas sales.

D.Wang--ThChM