The China Mail - British court spares Shell in climate case

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.000368
ALL 81.910403
AMD 376.168126
ANG 1.79008
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1431.790402
AUD 1.425923
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.654023
BBD 2.008288
BDT 121.941731
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.375999
BIF 2954.881813
BMD 1
BND 1.269737
BOB 6.889932
BRL 5.217404
BSD 0.997082
BTN 90.316715
BWP 13.200558
BYN 2.864561
BYR 19600
BZD 2.005328
CAD 1.36855
CDF 2200.000362
CHF 0.77566
CLF 0.021803
CLP 860.890396
CNY 6.93895
CNH 6.929815
COP 3684.65
CRC 494.312656
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.82504
CZK 20.504104
DJF 177.555076
DKK 6.322204
DOP 62.928665
DZD 129.553047
EGP 46.73094
ERN 15
ETB 155.0074
EUR 0.846204
FJD 2.209504
FKP 0.735067
GBP 0.734457
GEL 2.69504
GGP 0.735067
GHS 10.957757
GIP 0.735067
GMD 73.000355
GNF 8752.167111
GTQ 7.647681
GYD 208.609244
HKD 7.81385
HNL 26.45504
HRK 6.376104
HTG 130.618631
HUF 319.703831
IDR 16855.5
ILS 3.110675
IMP 0.735067
INR 90.57645
IQD 1310.5
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.710386
JEP 0.735067
JMD 156.057339
JOD 0.70904
JPY 157.200504
KES 128.622775
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4033.00035
KMF 419.00035
KPW 900.021111
KRW 1463.803789
KWD 0.30721
KYD 0.830902
KZT 493.331642
LAK 21426.698803
LBP 89293.839063
LKR 308.47816
LRD 187.449786
LSL 16.086092
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.314009
MAD 9.185039
MDL 17.000296
MGA 4426.402808
MKD 52.129054
MMK 2100.115486
MNT 3570.277081
MOP 8.023933
MRU 39.850379
MUR 46.060378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 17.263604
MYR 3.947504
MZN 63.750377
NAD 16.086092
NGN 1366.980377
NIO 36.694998
NOK 9.690604
NPR 144.506744
NZD 1.661958
OMR 0.383441
PAB 0.997082
PEN 3.367504
PGK 4.275868
PHP 58.511038
PKR 278.812127
PLN 3.56949
PYG 6588.016407
QAR 3.64135
RON 4.310404
RSD 99.553038
RUB 76.792845
RWF 1455.283522
SAR 3.749738
SBD 8.058149
SCR 13.675619
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.023204
SGD 1.272904
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.450371
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 568.818978
SRD 37.818038
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.719692
SVC 8.724259
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.08271
THB 31.535038
TJS 9.342721
TMT 3.505
TND 2.847504
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.612504
TTD 6.752083
TWD 31.590367
TZS 2577.445135
UAH 42.828111
UGX 3547.71872
UYU 38.538627
UZS 12244.069517
VES 377.985125
VND 25950
VUV 119.620171
WST 2.730723
XAF 554.743964
XAG 0.012866
XAU 0.000202
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.797032
XDR 0.689923
XOF 554.743964
XPF 101.703591
YER 238.403589
ZAR 16.04457
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.570764
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • NGG

    1.1700

    88.06

    +1.33%

  • GSK

    1.0600

    60.23

    +1.76%

  • RYCEF

    0.2600

    16.88

    +1.54%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    23.51

    -0.17%

  • RIO

    2.2900

    93.41

    +2.45%

  • AZN

    5.8700

    193.03

    +3.04%

  • RELX

    -0.7100

    29.38

    -2.42%

  • BP

    0.8400

    39.01

    +2.15%

  • BTI

    0.8400

    62.8

    +1.34%

  • BCE

    -0.4900

    25.08

    -1.95%

  • BCC

    1.8700

    91.03

    +2.05%

  • CMSD

    0.0600

    23.95

    +0.25%

  • JRI

    0.0900

    12.97

    +0.69%

  • VOD

    0.4900

    15.11

    +3.24%

British court spares Shell in climate case
British court spares Shell in climate case / Photo: © AFP/File

British court spares Shell in climate case

A British court dismissed a lawsuit that accused Shell's leadership of mismanaging climate risks to the oil giant on Monday, but the activist investor group that brought it plans to appeal.

Text size:

Corporations have faced a growing number of climate-related lawsuits in recent years as they come under pressure to step up efforts to curb global warming.

Shell was already ordered by a Dutch court in 2021 to slash its greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent by the end of the decade after it was sued by environmental groups.

This time, ClientEarth, an environmental law NGO and a minor Shell shareholder, filed in February a lawsuit in the High Court of England and Wales against Shell bosses "for failing to manage the material and foreseeable risks posed to the company by climate change".

But the judges dismissed the case, once in May and now following a hearing earlier in July.

ClientEarth said it was disappointed by the dismissal and plans to appeal.

A Shell spokesperson said the dismissal was "the right outcome –- the court has reaffirmed its decision that this claim is fundamentally flawed".

The company said ClientEarth's "claim entirely ignores how directors of a business as large and complex as Shell must balance a range of competing considerations".

At its annual shareholders meeting in May, Shell's management received majority backing even though there were disruptions and doubts expressed about its climate transition.

Shell later announced a change of plans: instead of gradually reducing oil output it would hold it steady until 2030.

"The Board's strategy to manage the risks of the energy transition was fundamentally flawed as it was," said ClientEarth senior lawyer Paul Benson.

"Now the Board seems to be dropping even any pretence that it will take meaningful action," he added in a statement.

ClientEarth says Shell's flawed climate strategy is inconsistent with the Paris Agreement and jeopardises the company's future commercial success, and thus constitutes a breach of its legal duties under English company law.

"The Board's refusal to take decisive action to prepare the company for the fast-advancing energy transition puts Shell’s future commercial viability at risk," said Benson.

According to ClientEarth, this is the first time a company's board has been targeted by a lawsuit for failing to properly handle the climate transition.

Shell's first-quarter net profit surged 22 percent to $8.7 billion but has indicated its second quarter performance has been hit by a drop in gas sales.

D.Wang--ThChM