The China Mail - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.000368
ALL 81.652501
AMD 376.168126
ANG 1.79008
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1431.790402
AUD 1.425923
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.654023
BBD 2.008288
BDT 121.941731
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.375914
BIF 2954.881813
BMD 1
BND 1.269737
BOB 6.889932
BRL 5.217404
BSD 0.997082
BTN 90.316715
BWP 13.200558
BYN 2.864561
BYR 19600
BZD 2.005328
CAD 1.36855
CDF 2200.000362
CHF 0.77566
CLF 0.021803
CLP 860.890396
CNY 6.93895
CNH 6.929815
COP 3699.522179
CRC 494.312656
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.2513
CZK 20.504104
DJF 177.555076
DKK 6.322204
DOP 62.928665
DZD 129.553047
EGP 46.73094
ERN 15
ETB 155.0074
EUR 0.846204
FJD 2.209504
FKP 0.73461
GBP 0.734457
GEL 2.69504
GGP 0.73461
GHS 10.957757
GIP 0.73461
GMD 73.000355
GNF 8752.167111
GTQ 7.647681
GYD 208.609244
HKD 7.81385
HNL 26.338534
HRK 6.376104
HTG 130.618631
HUF 319.703831
IDR 16855.5
ILS 3.110675
IMP 0.73461
INR 90.57645
IQD 1306.186308
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.710386
JEP 0.73461
JMD 156.057339
JOD 0.70904
JPY 157.200504
KES 128.622775
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4023.848789
KMF 419.00035
KPW 899.990005
KRW 1463.803789
KWD 0.30721
KYD 0.830902
KZT 493.331642
LAK 21426.698803
LBP 89293.839063
LKR 308.47816
LRD 187.449786
LSL 16.086092
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.314009
MAD 9.153622
MDL 17.000296
MGA 4426.402808
MKD 52.129054
MMK 2099.624884
MNT 3567.867665
MOP 8.023933
MRU 39.425769
MUR 46.060378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1728.952598
MXN 17.263604
MYR 3.947504
MZN 63.750377
NAD 16.086092
NGN 1366.980377
NIO 36.694998
NOK 9.690604
NPR 144.506744
NZD 1.674621
OMR 0.383441
PAB 0.997082
PEN 3.354899
PGK 4.275868
PHP 58.511038
PKR 278.812127
PLN 3.56949
PYG 6588.016407
QAR 3.634319
RON 4.310404
RSD 99.268468
RUB 76.789716
RWF 1455.283522
SAR 3.748738
SBD 8.058149
SCR 13.84955
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.023204
SGD 1.272904
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.450371
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 568.818978
SRD 37.818038
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.719692
SVC 8.724259
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.08271
THB 31.535038
TJS 9.342721
TMT 3.505
TND 2.891792
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.612504
TTD 6.752083
TWD 31.590367
TZS 2577.445135
UAH 42.828111
UGX 3547.71872
UYU 38.538627
UZS 12244.069517
VES 377.985125
VND 25950
VUV 119.182831
WST 2.73071
XAF 554.743964
XAG 0.012866
XAU 0.000202
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.797032
XDR 0.689923
XOF 554.743964
XPF 100.858387
YER 238.403589
ZAR 16.04457
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.570764
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • NGG

    1.1700

    88.06

    +1.33%

  • VOD

    0.4900

    15.11

    +3.24%

  • GSK

    1.0600

    60.23

    +1.76%

  • RIO

    2.2900

    93.41

    +2.45%

  • BCC

    1.8700

    91.03

    +2.05%

  • RYCEF

    0.2600

    16.88

    +1.54%

  • CMSD

    0.0600

    23.95

    +0.25%

  • BCE

    -0.4900

    25.08

    -1.95%

  • RELX

    -0.7100

    29.38

    -2.42%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    23.51

    -0.17%

  • JRI

    0.0900

    12.97

    +0.69%

  • AZN

    5.8700

    193.03

    +3.04%

  • BP

    0.8400

    39.01

    +2.15%

  • BTI

    0.8400

    62.8

    +1.34%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: © METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

E.Lau--ThChM