The China Mail - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 64.000052
ALL 81.197358
AMD 364.066319
ANG 1.790365
AOA 916.999774
ARS 1525.000898
AUD 1.438383
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.704465
BAM 1.725719
BBD 2.018882
BDT 123.247965
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.377906
BIF 3005.722202
BMD 1
BND 1.279885
BOB 12.063778
BRL 5.183402
BSD 1.002338
BTN 96.076978
BWP 14.120969
BYN 3.01672
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01597
CAD 1.424315
CDF 2312.495038
CHF 0.836375
CLF 0.024656
CLP 973.539953
CNY 6.70475
CNH 6.714101
COP 3314.79
CRC 457.846208
CUC 1
CUP 24.056893
CVE 97.29465
CZK 21.58325
DJF 178.497375
DKK 6.60147
DOP 59.602065
DZD 133.940995
EGP 51.992301
ERN 15
ETB 160.99988
EUR 0.88312
FJD 2.24875
FKP 0.753812
GBP 0.754325
GEL 2.595019
GGP 0.753812
GHS 11.732889
GIP 0.753812
GMD 74.000416
GNF 8750.000269
GTQ 7.658099
GYD 209.730789
HKD 7.846595
HNL 26.850145
HRK 6.6546
HTG 131.186306
HUF 323.547501
IDR 17952
ILS 3.06855
IMP 0.753812
INR 95.985504
IQD 1310
IRR 1693849.999896
ISK 120.989912
JEP 0.753812
JMD 158.635902
JOD 0.709052
JPY 158.295999
KES 129.709633
KGS 87.448703
KHR 4056.000101
KMF 434.999789
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1358.484957
KWD 0.3089
KYD 0.835337
KZT 440.918897
LAK 22440.000239
LBP 89549.999842
LKR 331.231884
LRD 171.401635
LSL 16.450172
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.604891
LYD 6.4159
MAD 9.723465
MDL 17.796797
MGA 4424.999837
MKD 54.331282
MMK 2099.783199
MNT 3598.053803
MOP 8.102072
MRU 40.084977
MUR 47.820549
MVR 15.459904
MWK 1735.99982
MXN 18.075735
MYR 4.087499
MZN 63.894034
NAD 16.459649
NGN 1327.110278
NIO 36.655019
NOK 9.630697
NPR 153.717739
NZD 1.77846
OMR 0.384509
PAB 1.002374
PEN 3.450503
PGK 4.444973
PHP 62.756498
PKR 277.050328
PLN 3.85302
PYG 5864.031411
QAR 3.645027
RON 4.6575
RSD 103.803969
RUB 83.373148
RWF 1475
SAR 3.780993
SBD 8.065041
SCR 14.585024
SDG 601.498309
SEK 10.01374
SGD 1.279395
SHP 0.754575
SLE 24.600496
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 571.483762
SRD 37.621498
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.675
SVC 8.77073
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.449742
THB 33.612502
TJS 9.232161
TMT 3.5
TND 2.97262
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.034485
TTD 6.800164
TWD 31.922806
TZS 2640.003002
UAH 44.775489
UGX 3929.198542
UYU 40.386126
UZS 11820.000246
VES 859.100049
VND 25969.5
VUV 119.747847
WST 2.7762
XAF 579.288877
XAG 0.016302
XAU 0.000238595436
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.806559
XDR 0.707052
XOF 579.288877
XPF 105.84944
YER 236.425006
ZAR 16.425675
ZMK 9001.19828
ZMW 19.596771
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5712.591903
MXV 2.045685
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: © METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

E.Lau--ThChM