The China Mail - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 70.194145
ALL 87.342841
AMD 389.04246
ANG 1.80229
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1111.647519
AUD 1.55885
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.738435
BBD 2.017593
BDT 121.453999
BGN 1.73832
BHD 0.376738
BIF 2972.677596
BMD 1
BND 1.297259
BOB 6.907279
BRL 5.648504
BSD 0.999245
BTN 85.280554
BWP 13.549247
BYN 3.271247
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007197
CAD 1.39435
CDF 2872.000362
CHF 0.832049
CLF 0.024361
CLP 934.834955
CNY 7.237304
CNH 7.24022
COP 4237.5
CRC 507.174908
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 98.250394
CZK 22.179804
DJF 177.937714
DKK 6.632104
DOP 58.79426
DZD 133.028566
EGP 50.592208
ERN 15
ETB 134.071527
EUR 0.888604
FJD 2.269204
FKP 0.751681
GBP 0.751965
GEL 2.74504
GGP 0.751681
GHS 13.15039
GIP 0.751681
GMD 71.503851
GNF 8653.427518
GTQ 7.68865
GYD 209.738061
HKD 7.778675
HNL 25.959394
HRK 6.698104
HTG 130.498912
HUF 359.260388
IDR 16550.45
ILS 3.54625
IMP 0.751681
INR 85.41285
IQD 1310
IRR 42100.000352
ISK 130.610386
JEP 0.751681
JMD 158.834244
JOD 0.709304
JPY 145.377504
KES 129.503801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4000.177707
KMF 436.503794
KPW 900.000002
KRW 1396.150383
KWD 0.306704
KYD 0.833015
KZT 515.881587
LAK 21610.000349
LBP 89600.000349
LKR 298.663609
LRD 199.848949
LSL 18.250381
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.476032
MAD 9.252504
MDL 17.132267
MGA 4495.979386
MKD 54.675907
MMK 2099.733149
MNT 3573.792034
MOP 8.008568
MRU 39.809854
MUR 45.710378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1732.640277
MXN 19.43815
MYR 4.297039
MZN 63.903729
NAD 18.250377
NGN 1607.110377
NIO 36.767515
NOK 10.37227
NPR 136.448532
NZD 1.692119
OMR 0.384771
PAB 0.999604
PEN 3.641039
PGK 4.147674
PHP 55.367038
PKR 281.409214
PLN 3.761969
PYG 7988.804478
QAR 3.64075
RON 4.549804
RSD 104.183425
RUB 82.455285
RWF 1436.403216
SAR 3.750872
SBD 8.343881
SCR 14.195211
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.712185
SGD 1.298104
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.750371
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.060465
SRD 36.702504
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.746395
SYP 13001.854971
SZL 18.166067
THB 32.960369
TJS 10.345808
TMT 3.51
TND 3.01625
TOP 2.342104
TRY 38.771315
TTD 6.790839
TWD 30.261404
TZS 2695.455151
UAH 41.510951
UGX 3658.552845
UYU 41.785367
UZS 12885.000334
VES 92.71499
VND 25978.5
VUV 121.00339
WST 2.778525
XAF 582.839753
XAG 0.03055
XAU 0.0003
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.724866
XOF 582.839753
XPF 106.450363
YER 244.450363
ZAR 18.19765
ZMK 9001.203587
ZMW 26.305034
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    65.2700

    65.27

    +100%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    22.34

    +0.04%

  • RELX

    0.3486

    53.85

    +0.65%

  • SCS

    -0.0200

    10.46

    -0.19%

  • BCC

    -0.9600

    88.62

    -1.08%

  • GSK

    -0.2500

    36.62

    -0.68%

  • NGG

    0.5100

    70.69

    +0.72%

  • RIO

    0.8000

    59.98

    +1.33%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.06

    -0.23%

  • AZN

    0.2700

    67.57

    +0.4%

  • BTI

    -1.6600

    41.64

    -3.99%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    12.98

    +0.23%

  • BP

    1.1800

    29.77

    +3.96%

  • BCE

    0.4800

    22.71

    +2.11%

  • VOD

    0.0500

    9.3

    +0.54%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    10.55

    +0.47%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: © METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

E.Lau--ThChM