The China Mail - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 63.493369
ALL 83.065121
AMD 368.061373
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.503082
ARS 1479.268799
AUD 1.450705
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.704306
BAM 1.724631
BBD 2.015008
BDT 123.052911
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.377235
BIF 2981.376318
BMD 1
BND 1.298014
BOB 6.913275
BRL 5.202301
BSD 1.000494
BTN 94.394378
BWP 13.651955
BYN 2.847191
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012169
CAD 1.42401
CDF 2269.000106
CHF 0.813199
CLF 0.023389
CLP 920.249899
CNY 6.7905
CNH 6.80507
COP 3440.62
CRC 455.363127
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.231163
CZK 21.38355
DJF 178.15793
DKK 6.59032
DOP 58.957356
DZD 133.564019
EGP 49.534796
ERN 15
ETB 157.79172
EUR 0.88172
FJD 2.244203
FKP 0.75995
GBP 0.759865
GEL 2.640163
GGP 0.75995
GHS 11.25259
GIP 0.75995
GMD 72.510374
GNF 8766.88653
GTQ 7.632888
GYD 209.329395
HKD 7.840575
HNL 26.770661
HRK 6.645899
HTG 130.762583
HUF 313.477965
IDR 17982
ILS 2.975899
IMP 0.75995
INR 94.38045
IQD 1310.623964
IRR 1375050.000123
ISK 126.960185
JEP 0.75995
JMD 157.684032
JOD 0.708978
JPY 161.850226
KES 129.59298
KGS 87.450161
KHR 4028.922887
KMF 433.999516
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1542.979919
KWD 0.30971
KYD 0.833737
KZT 484.885895
LAK 22235.351175
LBP 89595.167762
LKR 337.175056
LRD 182.081919
LSL 16.568199
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.424817
MAD 9.418715
MDL 17.758476
MGA 4265.244037
MKD 54.366184
MMK 2099.534862
MNT 3583.823146
MOP 8.07945
MRU 39.739339
MUR 48.190398
MVR 15.449729
MWK 1734.844143
MXN 17.638795
MYR 4.117302
MZN 63.909585
NAD 16.568199
NGN 1379.810012
NIO 36.814468
NOK 9.891199
NPR 151.027498
NZD 1.773553
OMR 0.384501
PAB 1.000485
PEN 3.423701
PGK 4.390498
PHP 61.322498
PKR 278.431272
PLN 3.78022
PYG 6113.48706
QAR 3.646841
RON 4.613097
RSD 103.466046
RUB 75.497985
RWF 1470.217363
SAR 3.75631
SBD 8.051953
SCR 14.057553
SDG 600.000277
SEK 9.75957
SGD 1.297675
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.792558
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.756095
SRD 37.459846
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.604176
SVC 8.754541
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.56607
THB 33.402522
TJS 9.249239
TMT 3.5
TND 2.970618
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.51525
TTD 6.795175
TWD 31.850502
TZS 2618.939032
UAH 44.986949
UGX 3701.80946
UYU 40.139678
UZS 12018.0946
VES 620.752985
VND 26320
VUV 119.820737
WST 2.777776
XAF 578.419823
XAG 0.017474
XAU 0.000251
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803071
XDR 0.718004
XOF 578.424923
XPF 105.161521
YER 238.625026
ZAR 16.561795
ZMK 9001.203975
ZMW 18.058287
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0650

    22.13

    +0.29%

  • CMSD

    -0.1250

    21.895

    -0.57%

  • BTI

    0.6160

    62.006

    +0.99%

  • NGG

    0.3800

    83.21

    +0.46%

  • AZN

    2.7900

    185.81

    +1.5%

  • RYCEF

    0.7400

    18.9

    +3.92%

  • RELX

    0.2300

    31.38

    +0.73%

  • GSK

    1.2400

    52.33

    +2.37%

  • BCC

    0.6400

    78.3

    +0.82%

  • BP

    0.1250

    37.985

    +0.33%

  • RIO

    1.0000

    95.03

    +1.05%

  • JRI

    0.0950

    12.665

    +0.75%

  • BCE

    -0.0400

    23.16

    -0.17%

  • VOD

    0.0200

    13.83

    +0.14%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    61.3

    0%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: © METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

E.Lau--ThChM