The China Mail - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

USD -
AED 3.67315
AFN 63.00003
ALL 83.250363
AMD 377.359962
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.999886
ARS 1367.988201
AUD 1.451368
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.699565
BAM 1.695925
BBD 2.012738
BDT 122.6148
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.37811
BIF 2970
BMD 1
BND 1.284247
BOB 6.920712
BRL 5.246899
BSD 0.999302
BTN 94.168452
BWP 13.739161
BYN 3.001028
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009859
CAD 1.385305
CDF 2285.495715
CHF 0.794982
CLF 0.023481
CLP 927.169942
CNY 6.90915
CNH 6.921097
COP 3687.54
CRC 463.31745
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.874996
CZK 21.258196
DJF 177.72012
DKK 6.48015
DOP 59.502097
DZD 133.041615
EGP 52.740899
ERN 15
ETB 157.149919
EUR 0.867301
FJD 2.250498
FKP 0.747836
GBP 0.750455
GEL 2.695052
GGP 0.747836
GHS 10.960345
GIP 0.747836
GMD 73.489851
GNF 8777.503027
GTQ 7.644781
GYD 209.069506
HKD 7.82573
HNL 26.519919
HRK 6.535902
HTG 130.870053
HUF 336.810126
IDR 16922
ILS 3.124098
IMP 0.747836
INR 94.18195
IQD 1310
IRR 1313299.999839
ISK 124.319947
JEP 0.747836
JMD 157.053853
JOD 0.709004
JPY 159.74101
KES 129.896773
KGS 87.450296
KHR 4014.999919
KMF 427.000262
KPW 900.057798
KRW 1508.260249
KWD 0.30721
KYD 0.832809
KZT 481.430095
LAK 21737.478349
LBP 89549.999826
LKR 314.289307
LRD 183.69759
LSL 17.049441
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.379876
MAD 9.33971
MDL 17.552896
MGA 4175.000202
MKD 53.472295
MMK 2099.983779
MNT 3583.827699
MOP 8.05281
MRU 40.109644
MUR 46.619727
MVR 15.459807
MWK 1735.999621
MXN 17.8445
MYR 3.994
MZN 63.910018
NAD 17.049938
NGN 1386.510643
NIO 36.720013
NOK 9.69139
NPR 150.669869
NZD 1.736395
OMR 0.384487
PAB 0.999298
PEN 3.4595
PGK 4.3095
PHP 60.232975
PKR 279.250161
PLN 3.71015
PYG 6540.378863
QAR 3.656504
RON 4.420301
RSD 101.858036
RUB 81.37321
RWF 1460
SAR 3.752011
SBD 8.041975
SCR 13.873228
SDG 600.999872
SEK 9.44017
SGD 1.285635
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.549957
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 571.498421
SRD 37.562002
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.35
SVC 8.74425
SYP 111.44287
SZL 17.049868
THB 32.990307
TJS 9.563521
TMT 3.51
TND 2.923497
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.3593
TTD 6.782836
TWD 31.988805
TZS 2574.999535
UAH 43.849933
UGX 3717.449554
UYU 40.512476
UZS 12190.000228
VES 466.018145
VND 26351
VUV 119.023334
WST 2.74953
XAF 568.80967
XAG 0.014809
XAU 0.000228
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80106
XDR 0.705441
XOF 566.504144
XPF 103.706186
YER 238.650424
ZAR 17.131555
ZMK 9001.207104
ZMW 18.762411
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSC

    -0.0650

    22.845

    -0.28%

  • RIO

    -1.7700

    85.77

    -2.06%

  • NGG

    -1.8800

    82.41

    -2.28%

  • RYCEF

    -0.6000

    15.3

    -3.92%

  • CMSD

    0.1600

    22.84

    +0.7%

  • GSK

    -0.7100

    53.99

    -1.32%

  • BCC

    -0.3300

    74.32

    -0.44%

  • RELX

    -0.4050

    32.065

    -1.26%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    12.07

    -0.25%

  • AZN

    -3.7400

    183.4

    -2.04%

  • BTI

    -0.1700

    58.28

    -0.29%

  • BCE

    -0.0300

    25.46

    -0.12%

  • VOD

    -0.0900

    14.63

    -0.62%

  • BP

    0.7800

    46.19

    +1.69%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: © METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

E.Lau--ThChM