The China Mail - Court rules UK government anti-protest powers unlawful

USD -
AED 3.672496
AFN 65.00037
ALL 81.643894
AMD 362.139857
ANG 1.790365
AOA 917.999777
ARS 1520.9949
AUD 1.432696
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.700325
BAM 1.7375
BBD 2.011772
BDT 122.756127
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.376608
BIF 3002.04786
BMD 1
BND 1.277108
BOB 12.009896
BRL 4.976299
BSD 0.998867
BTN 96.254936
BWP 13.739983
BYN 3.068524
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008697
CAD 1.422735
CDF 2320.000129
CHF 0.8309
CLF 0.024568
CLP 970.160139
CNY 6.70455
CNH 6.702415
COP 3221.07
CRC 457.269266
CUC 1
CUP 23.971252
CVE 97.952385
CZK 21.667297
DJF 177.86405
DKK 6.638405
DOP 60.226192
DZD 134.495016
EGP 52.3194
ERN 15
ETB 161.524186
EUR 0.88814
FJD 2.24625
FKP 0.756613
GBP 0.753155
GEL 2.595013
GGP 0.756613
GHS 11.755822
GIP 0.756613
GMD 74.000495
GNF 8787.508607
GTQ 7.629057
GYD 208.966494
HKD 7.84765
HNL 26.812312
HRK 6.693297
HTG 130.793628
HUF 324.363014
IDR 17872
ILS 3.04465
IMP 0.756613
INR 96.37005
IQD 1308.469336
IRR 1730149.999909
ISK 121.849971
JEP 0.756613
JMD 158.718596
JOD 0.708963
JPY 158.064017
KES 129.81032
KGS 87.450153
KHR 4045.680477
KMF 438.999575
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1337.854997
KWD 0.30949
KYD 0.832341
KZT 450.791818
LAK 22397.725758
LBP 89440.192599
LKR 330.203262
LRD 170.794762
LSL 16.542767
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.420348
MAD 9.960378
MDL 17.823955
MGA 4424.110514
MKD 54.706656
MMK 2099.06815
MNT 3597.6832
MOP 8.073986
MRU 39.991472
MUR 47.410267
MVR 15.455033
MWK 1731.942094
MXN 17.963795
MYR 4.085897
MZN 63.910066
NAD 16.543869
NGN 1324.603137
NIO 36.754874
NOK 9.56401
NPR 154.011674
NZD 1.778297
OMR 0.384508
PAB 0.998801
PEN 3.439606
PGK 4.458995
PHP 62.764502
PKR 276.639156
PLN 3.881715
PYG 5851.782097
QAR 3.640773
RON 4.749803
RSD 104.285961
RUB 85.399582
RWF 1475.275848
SAR 3.74737
SBD 8.058541
SCR 14.024499
SDG 601.500474
SEK 9.980815
SGD 1.277465
SHP 0.75643
SLE 24.649653
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 570.811752
SRD 37.650386
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.765396
SVC 8.739533
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.537472
THB 33.6065
TJS 9.208683
TMT 3.51
TND 2.979461
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.178801
TTD 6.770431
TWD 31.784983
TZS 2630.00301
UAH 44.866159
UGX 4029.976056
UYU 40.303811
UZS 11765.751039
VES 870.279505
VND 25992
VUV 120.275684
WST 2.783099
XAF 582.581751
XAG 0.016338
XAU 0.000240347639
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.800123
XDR 0.707052
XOF 582.581751
XPF 105.955676
YER 236.249872
ZAR 16.52215
ZMK 9001.199794
ZMW 19.751167
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5720.889873
MXV 2.030791
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Court rules UK government anti-protest powers unlawful
Court rules UK government anti-protest powers unlawful / Photo: © AFP

Court rules UK government anti-protest powers unlawful

The UK government acted unlawfully by changing legislation to give police tougher powers to clamp down on street protests, judges ruled on Tuesday.

Text size:

Civil liberties group Liberty brought a legal challenge to the amendments, which campaigners said gave police "almost unlimited" powers to restrict protests.

The changes were pushed through when outspoken right-winger Suella Braverman was home secretary. She had repeatedly promised to crack down on protesters using so-called "guerilla tactics".

That followed action, particularly by environmental groups such as Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion, in which demonstrators glued or attached themselves to roads and buildings.

Liberty's challenge centred on powers conferred by parliament to the home secretary to amend existing laws about when police could intervene during protests to prevent "serious" wider disruption.

Two judges ruled that lawmakers had not intended to lower the threshold for police action against protesters. But the amendments allowed police to target anything considered a "more than minor" disturbance.

The government only consulted law enforcement agencies before enacting the changes, the High Court ruling added.

"For the procedure to be fair and balanced, government needed at least to obtain the views of those who might be adversely affected by the proposed measures," the judges added.

Liberty called the judgment "a victory for democracy" and said it "sets down an important marker that the government cannot just do what it wants".

Braverman, who was sacked for comments on immigration, initially tried to give police greater powers via a parliamentary vote on a new public order act.

Lawmakers rejected those proposals, and a few months later she used secondary legislation, which allows a minister to amend an existing law, to secure the powers "through the back door", Liberty said.

The government has indicated that it will appeal the ruling, which came as its adviser on political violence on Tuesday recommended sweeping measures to curb protests.

In a report, former Labour party MP John Woodcock proposed making organisers pay towards the policing of demonstrations and making it easier for members of the public to claim damages against activist groups that cause disruption.

He also recommended a blanket ban on face coverings at protests and buffer zones around MPs' constituency offices so demonstrations cannot be held there.

Current Home Secretary James Cleverly said in a written statement to parliament that he would carefully consider the proposals, including "amending the threshold to prevent protests from going ahead".

Protests have become a hot political issue in Britain with right-wing MPs regularly criticising massive pro-Palestinian demonstrations against the Israel-Hamas war.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak intends to put security and combating perceived extremism at the heart of his Conservative party's general election campaign later this year.

Q.Moore--ThChM