The China Mail - Worth the weight? Van Niekerk decision hands cricket modern day dilemma

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 65.000462
ALL 81.404056
AMD 360.930194
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000296
ARS 1537.902498
AUD 1.422678
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.699143
BAM 1.75401
BBD 2.012923
BDT 123.983804
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377199
BIF 2998.457454
BMD 1
BND 1.280463
BOB 11.889313
BRL 5.341304
BSD 0.999466
BTN 94.999372
BWP 13.826286
BYN 2.940367
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010116
CAD 1.404855
CDF 2314.999483
CHF 0.828585
CLF 0.024967
CLP 985.850248
CNY 6.66835
CNH 6.664255
COP 3155.61
CRC 454.490425
CUC 1
CUP 23.987373
CVE 98.888386
CZK 21.852985
DJF 177.719904
DKK 6.711765
DOP 61.296875
DZD 135.291662
EGP 56.096444
ERN 15
ETB 162.582372
EUR 0.89797
FJD 2.252798
FKP 0.749223
GBP 0.751225
GEL 2.593024
GGP 0.749223
GHS 11.648962
GIP 0.749223
GMD 74.000038
GNF 8845.382922
GTQ 7.638188
GYD 209.445401
HKD 7.84455
HNL 26.833413
HRK 6.765801
HTG 130.928626
HUF 329.230378
IDR 18137.85
ILS 3.02401
IMP 0.749223
INR 94.99285
IQD 1515.158309
IRR 1817007.524696
ISK 122.460014
JEP 0.749223
JMD 159.024972
JOD 0.708968
JPY 157.91502
KES 129.930206
KGS 87.449202
KHR 4080.479613
KMF 441.00026
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1326.409546
KWD 0.31118
KYD 0.832885
KZT 456.816419
LAK 22494.753646
LBP 89501.999892
LKR 332.273585
LRD 169.913187
LSL 16.669223
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.420085
MAD 9.844894
MDL 18.050231
MGA 4549.530967
MKD 55.226471
MMK 2099.77173
MNT 3599.40728
MOP 8.076123
MRU 40.152816
MUR 47.31972
MVR 15.449776
MWK 1733.121682
MXN 18.678645
MYR 4.08797
MZN 63.909965
NAD 16.669073
NGN 1342.160085
NIO 36.778125
NOK 9.33202
NPR 151.999677
NZD 1.759275
OMR 0.3845
PAB 0.999498
PEN 3.443297
PGK 4.480537
PHP 63.969799
PKR 276.580407
PLN 3.950201
PYG 5815.01195
QAR 3.64344
RON 4.804402
RSD 105.531947
RUB 80.547795
RWF 1479.229445
SAR 3.750364
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.820536
SDG 601.513194
SEK 9.945895
SGD 1.28108
SHP 0.749344
SLE 22.950163
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.182587
SRD 37.650502
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.971222
SVC 8.745835
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.661958
THB 33.770286
TJS 9.19474
TMT 3.5
TND 2.992884
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.787299
TTD 6.784327
TWD 32.414498
TZS 2644.594964
UAH 45.626679
UGX 4382.704147
UYU 40.070132
UZS 11928.452601
VES 859.934971
VND 25834
VUV 118.743227
WST 2.764729
XAF 589.030005
XAG 0.01841
XAU 0.00024638431
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801256
XDR 0.707052
XOF 589.030005
XPF 106.953406
YER 236.14986
ZAR 16.6258
ZMK 9001.205131
ZMW 20.155866
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.701932
MXV 2.106801
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Worth the weight? Van Niekerk decision hands cricket modern day dilemma
Worth the weight? Van Niekerk decision hands cricket modern day dilemma / Photo: © AFP/File

Worth the weight? Van Niekerk decision hands cricket modern day dilemma

Once upon a time, cricket was seen as a universal game. Not just in its appeal to a global audience but for the fact that individuals of any shape, size, colour, creed or class could play alongside each other.

Text size:

With the news that Dane van Niekerk, one of the best players in the women's game, has been left out of South Africa's Twenty20 World Cup squad on fitness grounds alone, this age-old perception may just have landed in the trashcan.

Less athletic players, it seems, are now being penalised, no matter how good they are at actually playing cricket. And yet some of the greatest players would have struggled to pass fitness tests, certainly in their older years.

WG Grace, who used to "block shooters to the boundary" in the 19th century, may have started his career as a lithe athlete but had little time for the sharp single as his waistline expanded in his thirties and forties.

Warwick Armstrong, one of Australia's greatest captains in the early part of the 20th century, was known as the "Big Ship" because of his 130kg frame and billowing shirt.

Van Niekerk, 29, is a leg-spinning all-rounder and the only South African woman to have scored more than 1,500 runs and taken more than 50 wickets in women's T20 internationals.

From 2016 to 2021 she captained the side in all three formats.

However, she last played for the national team in September 2021 and has been recovering from a broken ankle.

Her exclusion from the World Cup squad was because she did not achieve the required time for a two-kilometre run.

Having lost 10kg since playing in England last summer and in spite of running a personal best, she missed the nine minute 30 seconds limit by 18 seconds which, according to team officials, was not good enough.

"Dane was given an extensive opportunity to meet the minimum criteria, or the fitness benchmark for eligibility into the World Cup," said women's selection convener Clinton du Preez.

"It's purely based on the not meeting of the fitness criteria that she's missed out."

- Fitness v performance -

Van Niekerk said she was "broken" by the decision to exclude her from the World Cup which starts on her home patch on February 10, but the decision may backfire on the South Africans who now go into the tournament without two, maybe even three, of their best players.

Last year, another key player Lizelle Lee was left out of the tour to England and Ireland for failing to meet her weight requirement. She subsequently retired from international cricket in order to play in the franchises.

And, although she was named in the World Cup squad, there must be some doubt as to whether Marizanne Kapp will walk away in protest. She is married to Van Niekerk and pulled out of Thursday's T20 against India for "personal" reasons.

South Africa is not the only country to have fitness tests but they do appear one of the more rigid.

Sisanda Magala, who played in the recent men's ODI series against England, was excluded from the squad last year after similarly failing to meet the target, in his case by 12 seconds.

The Van Niekerk decision highlights, however, a trend in cricket which is seeing a squeeze on athletes who are built more for comfort than speed.

The rise of short-form cricket is certainly a factor as the fielding skills are now far advanced of what they were even 10 years ago.

The natural power advantage that bigger players such as Colin Milburn or the "short and stocky" New Zealand wicketkeeper Jock Edwards may have had in the past is less vital now that bats have become sledgehammer and boundaries have been shortened.

What future then for the likes of West Indies off-spinner Rahkeem Cornwall, listed on his Wiki page as weighing in at 140 kilos, or the Pakistani batsman Azam Khan who is still mocked, as seen on Twitter this week as he walked out to bat in the Bangladesh Premier League, even after losing 30kilos?

"It's not about being overweight, it's about performance," said Azam, making the case for the defence in an article in January's Cricket Monthly.

"If a guy is scoring 400 runs and he is super-fit and another guy is scoring 800 runs and he is not super-fit, I will keep the guy who scored 800 runs in my team. That's my point of view."

G.Tsang--ThChM