The China Mail - Lawyer says Vondrousova 'should appeal' against four-year ban

USD -
AED 3.67295
AFN 65.551421
ALL 81.18496
AMD 365.910292
AOA 917.000139
ARS 1492.402971
AUD 1.41594
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.732138
BAM 1.695366
BBD 2.013843
BDT 123.135735
BHD 0.37705
BIF 2990.5
BMD 1
BND 1.279359
BOB 11.793465
BRL 5.191975
BSD 0.9999
BTN 95.268311
BWP 13.46018
BYN 2.986239
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011
CAD 1.394125
CDF 2275.00005
CHF 0.813302
CLF 0.023239
CLP 914.619982
CNY 6.74385
CNH 6.745755
COP 3148.92
CRC 454.22433
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.999853
CZK 21.026947
DJF 177.720024
DKK 6.48672
DOP 58.380219
DZD 132.885825
EGP 50.216605
ERN 15
ETB 159.975026
EUR 0.86774
FJD 2.233198
FKP 0.740048
GBP 0.74105
GEL 2.609808
GGP 0.740048
GHS 11.40389
GIP 0.740048
GMD 74.000094
GNF 8777.493911
GTQ 7.628996
GYD 209.231063
HKD 7.84686
HNL 26.875047
HRK 6.537496
HTG 130.787734
HUF 315.984031
IDR 17859
ILS 2.9791
IMP 0.740048
INR 95.34365
IQD 1310.5
IRR 1374624.999886
ISK 123.209803
JEP 0.740048
JMD 158.295084
JOD 0.708977
JPY 159.422981
KES 129.250272
KGS 87.449705
KHR 4055.999947
KMF 428.000283
KRW 1417.270271
KWD 0.30916
KYD 0.833286
KZT 465.567234
LAK 22552.558187
LBP 89683.569293
LKR 334.236292
LRD 181.62497
LSL 16.159983
LTL 2.952741
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.364985
MAD 9.306495
MDL 17.333189
MGA 4307.509472
MKD 53.336685
MMK 2099.936813
MNT 3596.665371
MOP 8.081969
MRU 40.109774
MUR 47.069617
MVR 15.460212
MWK 1736.999954
MXN 17.054983
MYR 4.085501
MZN 63.905413
NAD 16.159847
NGN 1363.469878
NIO 36.797691
NOK 9.498102
NPR 152.426482
NZD 1.706575
OMR 0.384668
PAB 0.999909
PEN 3.359498
PGK 4.405005
PHP 61.244976
PKR 277.791011
PLN 3.73605
PYG 5966.513668
QAR 3.64575
RON 4.542497
RSD 101.88203
RUB 82.889419
RWF 1468
SAR 3.748756
SBD 8.064941
SCR 13.922777
SDG 600.500451
SEK 9.580097
SGD 1.280502
SLE 24.550142
SOS 571.504833
SRD 37.669798
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.5
SVC 8.749095
SZL 16.150178
THB 33.110057
TJS 9.249093
TMT 3.5
TND 2.936991
TRY 47.757085
TTD 6.781351
TWD 32.2328
TZS 2649.493026
UAH 44.67795
UGX 3709.209745
UYU 40.247745
UZS 11957.999919
VES 765.401052
VND 26049.5
VUV 118.442804
WST 2.72999
XAF 568.605049
XAG 0.015308
XAU 0.000227
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802074
XDR 0.706905
XOF 567.999764
XPF 103.874977
YER 237.149852
ZAR 16.12757
ZMK 9001.20327
ZMW 18.8184
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    2.2800

    72.16

    +3.16%

  • NGG

    0.4100

    80.68

    +0.51%

  • RIO

    0.2300

    101.22

    +0.23%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0200

    20.55

    -0.1%

  • CMSC

    0.0100

    21.45

    +0.05%

  • VOD

    0.1900

    16.09

    +1.18%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    21.59

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    -0.8200

    34.55

    -2.37%

  • BCE

    -0.2400

    23.13

    -1.04%

  • AZN

    -0.2500

    158.5

    -0.16%

  • BTI

    -0.9700

    55.84

    -1.74%

  • BCC

    -1.2800

    84.25

    -1.52%

  • BP

    -0.2300

    42.93

    -0.54%

  • GSK

    -0.6000

    50.3

    -1.19%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    12.71

    -0.16%

Lawyer says Vondrousova 'should appeal' against four-year ban
Lawyer says Vondrousova 'should appeal' against four-year ban / Photo: © AFP/File

Lawyer says Vondrousova 'should appeal' against four-year ban

The lawyer for Marketa Vondrousova told AFP on Thursday that he believes the former Wimbledon champion "should appeal" against the four-year ban handed down this week for missing a doping control.

Text size:

The International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) blames the 26-year-old Czech for failing to open her door to an anti-doping officer in December 2025.

The 2023 Wimbledon winner claimed in April she was scared when the officer rang the bell "without properly identifying themselves or following protocol".

"This decision will ultimately be Marketa's, of course, but from the beginning I've been advising her that I think she should appeal, that she should fight, because in my view it shouldn't end with this kind of career‑destroying sanction," her lawyer Jan Exner told AFP.

"So I'll recommend it to her again, but the final decision will be hers."

Exner also suggested that if the ban stays in place, it could mean Vondrousova stepping away from the game.

"When you get four years for doping, it's an idea that pretty much has to cross your mind, because it's basically a career‑ending punishment," he said.

"Yeah, and the statistics are such that the vast majority of athletes never come back from this kind of ban. So it basically amounts to a lifetime ban.

"But of course I hope it won't turn out that way and that Marketa will keep fighting."

In an interview with The Times, published on Thursday, Vondrousova admitted she has been left "completely broken" by the decision.

"I immediately started to cry," said Vondrousova.

"Like, what the hell? How can the this be? It's like you have no power over anything. I told the truth, but one side of the story was heard and it's not mine.

"For me, it's career-ending. I'm 27 (on Sunday). It's not like you are 19 or whatever. Overall, four years, it's the craziest thing."

- 'Scared' -

Vondrousova, who has never tested positive for doping, claims the doping control officer failed to show their official ID after ringing her doorbell.

She says she was alone at home and "scared".

"I felt really under pressure and I just panicked," said Vondrousova.

"I decided to go down and check the situation and when I came down in the elevator, she was standing in the middle of an open door.

"I went out and she stepped out as well. She told me, 'You have to do the test. You have to let me in'.

"I was like, 'I don't know you, I've never seen you. I'm scared. I'm not going to let you in.'"

The stand-off continued until Vondrousova agreed to sign the form, she says for her own safety.

The ITIA maintains that Vondrousova came downstairs with her dog and went for a walk once she had signed the form.

"They are saying from our side, everything was OK. She went out with the dog. She signed it. That's it. End of story," she says.

"It's not this easy. We've all been in the hearing and (the officer) admitted everything, so for me, it's really scary."

In a statement to The Times, the ITIA said: "In this specific case, there are clear rules and we were left with no choice but to charge the player after she refused a test."

D.Wang--ThChM