The China Mail - Prince Harry, Elton John lose case against UK tabloid

USD -
AED 3.672494
AFN 63.999845
ALL 81.982266
AMD 366.231177
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.507894
ARS 1485.74101
AUD 1.439273
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.701675
BAM 1.710303
BBD 2.013834
BDT 123.232447
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.376991
BIF 2975.597599
BMD 1
BND 1.291434
BOB 6.923833
BRL 5.141496
BSD 0.999886
BTN 94.906999
BWP 13.504556
BYN 2.855969
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010948
CAD 1.42177
CDF 2254.999796
CHF 0.806285
CLF 0.023535
CLP 926.30966
CNY 6.796404
CNH 6.796975
COP 3355.69
CRC 455.51533
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.425526
CZK 21.192969
DJF 178.054699
DKK 6.53772
DOP 59.045237
DZD 133.035937
EGP 48.853052
ERN 15
ETB 160.395355
EUR 0.874599
FJD 2.238699
FKP 0.74808
GBP 0.747065
GEL 2.635034
GGP 0.74808
GHS 11.41383
GIP 0.74808
GMD 73.500129
GNF 8769.375396
GTQ 7.629008
GYD 209.151527
HKD 7.84255
HNL 26.765367
HRK 6.590153
HTG 130.805488
HUF 309.540496
IDR 17891.4
ILS 3.02605
IMP 0.74808
INR 94.897351
IQD 1309.803853
IRR 1375700.000087
ISK 125.779705
JEP 0.74808
JMD 157.475908
JOD 0.709021
JPY 161.889038
KES 129.289799
KGS 87.449791
KHR 4016.475156
KMF 431.496617
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1513.834983
KWD 0.30969
KYD 0.833206
KZT 469.178771
LAK 22530.235324
LBP 89538.226099
LKR 334.761659
LRD 181.778433
LSL 16.240676
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.413418
MAD 9.349651
MDL 17.592738
MGA 4239.503992
MKD 53.911857
MMK 2099.417966
MNT 3585.605216
MOP 8.076412
MRU 39.901534
MUR 47.079846
MVR 15.450152
MWK 1733.412037
MXN 17.42375
MYR 4.0709
MZN 63.899493
NAD 16.240676
NGN 1370.80389
NIO 36.798335
NOK 9.80788
NPR 151.84952
NZD 1.75699
OMR 0.384499
PAB 0.999886
PEN 3.399124
PGK 4.394249
PHP 61.433984
PKR 277.987285
PLN 3.754725
PYG 6087.237875
QAR 3.645172
RON 4.5781
RSD 102.631974
RUB 76.230685
RWF 1465.280905
SAR 3.75636
SBD 8.097426
SCR 13.460689
SDG 600.500338
SEK 9.659699
SGD 1.291315
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.374984
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.383598
SRD 37.692996
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.424886
SVC 8.749262
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.231248
THB 33.257013
TJS 9.243786
TMT 3.5
TND 2.957395
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.840205
TTD 6.785945
TWD 32.1045
TZS 2625.002995
UAH 44.49669
UGX 3659.688336
UYU 40.243455
UZS 12015.320846
VES 666.216185
VND 26292
VUV 120.145102
WST 2.767779
XAF 573.619637
XAG 0.016239
XAU 0.00024
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801948
XDR 0.71319
XOF 573.619637
XPF 104.291099
YER 237.074977
ZAR 16.238015
ZMK 9001.208119
ZMW 18.422779
ZWL 321.999592
  • VOD

    0.1250

    13.205

    +0.95%

  • RYCEF

    -0.6300

    19.46

    -3.24%

  • RBGPF

    0.1700

    68.32

    +0.25%

  • CMSC

    -0.0200

    22.04

    -0.09%

  • BCE

    0.6400

    21.51

    +2.98%

  • RELX

    0.7100

    32.98

    +2.15%

  • GSK

    0.5950

    53.685

    +1.11%

  • CMSD

    -0.0800

    22.15

    -0.36%

  • AZN

    2.4900

    192.65

    +1.29%

  • BP

    0.9700

    38.36

    +2.53%

  • NGG

    1.4000

    83.99

    +1.67%

  • RIO

    -2.0600

    91.52

    -2.25%

  • BTI

    0.7000

    62.16

    +1.13%

  • BCC

    -1.0850

    74.195

    -1.46%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    13.14

    +0.23%

Prince Harry, Elton John lose case against UK tabloid
Prince Harry, Elton John lose case against UK tabloid / Photo: © AFP

Prince Harry, Elton John lose case against UK tabloid

Prince Harry and Elton John on Tuesday lost their case against the Daily Mail's publisher for alleged unlawful information gathering, according to a ruling by London's High Court.

Text size:

A written judgment published following an 11-week trial earlier this year said the "claimants failed to prove their pleaded allegations... the claims are therefore dismissed".

The prince gave emotional testimony during the proceedings against Associated Newspapers in which several high-profile figures, including John and actor Elizabeth Hurley, accused the tabloid publisher of invading their privacy.

Harry's lawyers had said they were seeking "substantial" damages on behalf of their clients over articles dating from 1993 to 2018.

It was the third and final case brought by the Duke of Sussex in his acrimonious legal battle with British tabloids, which has further strained relations with the royal family.

Harry, 41 -- the youngest son of King Charles III -- has also been involved in other legal spats, including over his police protection in Britain following his dramatic departure from frontline royal duties six years ago.

The prince, now living in California, arrived in Britain on Monday for a five-day visit expected to go ahead mostly without his wife and children after the family was refused police protection.

The trip, to mark the one-year countdown to next year's Invictus Games for wounded veterans, which Harry founded, was meant to be his first family trip back to the UK in four years.

But a source close to the Duke of Sussex told AFP that Harry's wife Meghan, son Archie and daughter Lilibet would not accompany him on the London leg of the trip after the family was refused security.

Arrangements for the rest of the trip were still under consideration, the source said, leaving it unclear whether the whole family would visit but stay outside the capital.

Contradictory statements about plans to stay at Buckingham Palace while in London added to the prince's headaches.

Just ahead of Harry's arrival, Buckingham Palace contradicted the duke's team to say that he would not be staying at the palace after missing a deadline to accept the accommodation offer.

Harry's spokesman said it was "disappointing" the offer to be hosted by his father had been "withdrawn at the last moment", in a statement sent to AFP.

- Security woes -

It was unclear whether the prince would meet his father during the trip. He is last understood to have met Charles, who is being treated for an undisclosed form of cancer, at the monarch's London residence Clarence House in September 2025.

Harry and Meghan left Britain for North America in 2020 amid a bitter feud with his family, which worsened as Harry published his tell-all memoir "Spare".

The prince has since said he wishes to reconcile with his father, but the confusion over where Harry was going to stay in London suggest relations remain difficult.

According to his spokesperson, Harry had to make "alternative security arrangements" for the trip after publicly funded protection was refused, contributing to the delay in accepting Buckingham Palace's accommodation offer.

"It is therefore unclear why, having formally accepted the accommodation offer, it has now been withdrawn at the last moment," the spokesman said.

Beyond logistical complications, the palace believed the legal judgment complicated matters as it could compromise the king's constitutional position, the PA news agency reported.

Last year, Harry said he felt unable to bring his family to Britain after losing a court case to have his security restored during visits home.

Harry has long blamed the media for the death of his mother Princess Diana, who was killed in a Paris car crash in 1997 while trying to shake off the paparazzi.

"He understands how that protection can fail and how catastrophic, therefore, those results can be," Simon Morgan, a former bodyguard for the royal family, told AFP on Monday.

K.Lam--ThChM