The China Mail - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 66.000374
ALL 83.903019
AMD 382.570057
ANG 1.789982
AOA 917.000223
ARS 1450.636598
AUD 1.536098
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.692558
BAM 1.701894
BBD 2.013462
BDT 121.860805
BGN 1.69979
BHD 0.376976
BIF 2951
BMD 1
BND 1.306514
BOB 6.907654
BRL 5.359898
BSD 0.999682
BTN 88.718716
BWP 13.495075
BYN 3.407518
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010599
CAD 1.410305
CDF 2220.999671
CHF 0.809197
CLF 0.024061
CLP 943.919887
CNY 7.126749
CNH 7.12783
COP 3834.5
CRC 501.842642
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.37502
CZK 21.18795
DJF 177.719699
DKK 6.488515
DOP 64.271583
DZD 130.737978
EGP 47.4076
ERN 15
ETB 153.125033
EUR 0.869161
FJD 2.281106
FKP 0.766694
GBP 0.76569
GEL 2.714993
GGP 0.766694
GHS 10.925012
GIP 0.766694
GMD 73.488724
GNF 8690.999809
GTQ 7.661048
GYD 209.152772
HKD 7.774645
HNL 26.35986
HRK 6.548702
HTG 130.911876
HUF 336.283034
IDR 16704.85
ILS 3.25805
IMP 0.766694
INR 88.608098
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.501156
ISK 127.770263
JEP 0.766694
JMD 160.956848
JOD 0.709043
JPY 153.938007
KES 129.250011
KGS 87.449801
KHR 4026.99975
KMF 425.999786
KPW 899.974506
KRW 1447.090344
KWD 0.30716
KYD 0.83313
KZT 525.140102
LAK 21639.999738
LBP 89700.938812
LKR 304.599802
LRD 183.449917
LSL 17.309908
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.455049
MAD 9.310293
MDL 17.135125
MGA 4500.000192
MKD 53.533982
MMK 2099.235133
MNT 3586.705847
MOP 8.006805
MRU 39.800135
MUR 46.029671
MVR 15.404966
MWK 1737.000378
MXN 18.59399
MYR 4.184499
MZN 63.950384
NAD 17.310271
NGN 1442.260167
NIO 36.769801
NOK 10.207245
NPR 141.949154
NZD 1.765305
OMR 0.384511
PAB 0.999687
PEN 3.383891
PGK 4.216022
PHP 58.868996
PKR 282.634661
PLN 3.698775
PYG 7077.158694
QAR 3.644235
RON 4.4191
RSD 101.863015
RUB 81.348914
RWF 1452.539246
SAR 3.750451
SBD 8.223823
SCR 13.714276
SDG 600.494813
SEK 9.555925
SGD 1.305855
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.203654
SLL 20969.499529
SOS 571.286853
SRD 38.557989
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.319828
SVC 8.747031
SYP 11058.728905
SZL 17.467466
THB 32.479846
TJS 9.257197
TMT 3.5
TND 2.963392
TOP 2.342104
TRY 42.105898
TTD 6.775354
TWD 30.926989
TZS 2459.807016
UAH 42.064759
UGX 3491.230589
UYU 39.758439
UZS 11987.501353
VES 223.682203
VND 26325
VUV 121.938877
WST 2.805824
XAF 570.814334
XAG 0.020878
XAU 0.000251
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801656
XDR 0.70875
XOF 570.503629
XPF 103.778346
YER 238.549836
ZAR 17.392603
ZMK 9001.212404
ZMW 22.392878
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.2400

    23.83

    +1.01%

  • RELX

    0.2800

    44.58

    +0.63%

  • NGG

    0.2300

    75.37

    +0.31%

  • RYCEF

    0.1500

    15.1

    +0.99%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    11.27

    +0.62%

  • BTI

    0.9000

    53.88

    +1.67%

  • SCS

    0.0600

    15.93

    +0.38%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    76

    0%

  • GSK

    -0.1300

    46.69

    -0.28%

  • RIO

    1.1700

    69.06

    +1.69%

  • CMSD

    0.1900

    24.01

    +0.79%

  • JRI

    0.0700

    13.77

    +0.51%

  • BCC

    0.9700

    71.38

    +1.36%

  • BCE

    0.1000

    22.39

    +0.45%

  • BP

    0.5600

    35.68

    +1.57%

  • AZN

    -0.8800

    81.15

    -1.08%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.