The China Mail - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 68.256206
ALL 83.066274
AMD 382.490167
ANG 1.789783
AOA 916.999777
ARS 1418.987903
AUD 1.508432
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.702307
BAM 1.671367
BBD 2.013724
BDT 121.707771
BGN 1.668801
BHD 0.377022
BIF 2983.618045
BMD 1
BND 1.283398
BOB 6.909075
BRL 5.4027
BSD 0.999812
BTN 88.112288
BWP 13.398564
BYN 3.384577
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01087
CAD 1.38481
CDF 2871.000218
CHF 0.796901
CLF 0.024569
CLP 963.850506
CNY 7.121502
CNH 7.11623
COP 3925.64
CRC 504.279238
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.229093
CZK 20.80535
DJF 178.047249
DKK 6.366115
DOP 63.605599
DZD 129.742028
EGP 48.085035
ERN 15
ETB 143.851176
EUR 0.85276
FJD 2.271798
FKP 0.738995
GBP 0.73803
GEL 2.689997
GGP 0.738995
GHS 12.197915
GIP 0.738995
GMD 72.496392
GNF 8669.606385
GTQ 7.663778
GYD 209.187358
HKD 7.789715
HNL 26.199388
HRK 6.424606
HTG 130.786651
HUF 335.001981
IDR 16438.75
ILS 3.32245
IMP 0.738995
INR 88.04135
IQD 1309.883949
IRR 42074.999673
ISK 121.940167
JEP 0.738995
JMD 160.086482
JOD 0.709023
JPY 147.406019
KES 129.200622
KGS 87.449711
KHR 4006.990228
KMF 420.506379
KPW 900.013015
KRW 1386.405009
KWD 0.30543
KYD 0.833191
KZT 538.548966
LAK 21674.186492
LBP 89536.574944
LKR 301.953546
LRD 189.967527
LSL 17.573023
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.406006
MAD 9.025364
MDL 16.647582
MGA 4443.532951
MKD 52.581654
MMK 2099.458951
MNT 3597.415466
MOP 8.022133
MRU 39.984447
MUR 45.50243
MVR 15.410299
MWK 1733.720731
MXN 18.5779
MYR 4.214948
MZN 63.904195
NAD 17.573023
NGN 1507.780533
NIO 36.797758
NOK 9.882555
NPR 140.982332
NZD 1.678404
OMR 0.384496
PAB 0.999795
PEN 3.492283
PGK 4.240373
PHP 57.023495
PKR 283.817447
PLN 3.632802
PYG 7162.145995
QAR 3.645251
RON 4.327501
RSD 99.882049
RUB 84.348556
RWF 1448.812169
SAR 3.751684
SBD 8.223823
SCR 14.266967
SDG 600.999987
SEK 9.31537
SGD 1.281255
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.37504
SLL 20969.49797
SOS 571.448104
SRD 39.374003
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.936234
SVC 8.749081
SYP 13001.736919
SZL 17.555269
THB 31.740983
TJS 9.488225
TMT 3.51
TND 2.916133
TOP 2.342101
TRY 41.28513
TTD 6.786019
TWD 30.278013
TZS 2465.000185
UAH 41.25211
UGX 3509.596486
UYU 39.934027
UZS 12353.654993
VES 154.688798
VND 26395
VUV 119.746932
WST 2.715893
XAF 560.548793
XAG 0.024285
XAU 0.000274
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802
XDR 0.697447
XOF 560.560768
XPF 101.915945
YER 239.563464
ZAR 17.477304
ZMK 9001.193009
ZMW 24.171082
ZWL 321.999592
  • RYCEF

    0.2200

    14.87

    +1.48%

  • AZN

    -0.5400

    80.68

    -0.67%

  • CMSC

    0.1300

    24.27

    +0.54%

  • GSK

    -0.3150

    40.465

    -0.78%

  • RELX

    -2.0600

    45.13

    -4.56%

  • BTI

    -0.0950

    56.165

    -0.17%

  • NGG

    0.0500

    70.41

    +0.07%

  • VOD

    -0.1500

    11.71

    -1.28%

  • RIO

    0.3050

    62.175

    +0.49%

  • BCC

    0.3900

    85.68

    +0.46%

  • CMSD

    0.0390

    24.409

    +0.16%

  • BCE

    -0.0900

    24.11

    -0.37%

  • JRI

    0.1770

    13.957

    +1.27%

  • SCS

    -0.1300

    16.75

    -0.78%

  • BP

    0.5300

    34.62

    +1.53%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    77.27

    0%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.