The China Mail - Milei suffers crushing Defeat

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 66.106128
ALL 82.462283
AMD 381.646874
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.000439
ARS 1451.493896
AUD 1.49923
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.702241
BAM 1.666106
BBD 2.015555
BDT 122.381003
BGN 1.666697
BHD 0.376969
BIF 2960.464106
BMD 1
BND 1.286514
BOB 6.930128
BRL 5.515501
BSD 1.000707
BTN 90.075562
BWP 13.139445
BYN 2.939776
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012659
CAD 1.372555
CDF 2165.000177
CHF 0.793565
CLF 0.022945
CLP 900.139472
CNY 6.9964
CNH 6.97704
COP 3769.96
CRC 497.073782
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.933689
CZK 20.586898
DJF 177.719689
DKK 6.36617
DOP 63.090461
DZD 129.565162
EGP 47.707798
ERN 15
ETB 155.306806
EUR 0.85232
FJD 2.273304
FKP 0.741981
GBP 0.74363
GEL 2.694986
GGP 0.741981
GHS 10.508067
GIP 0.741981
GMD 73.999807
GNF 8754.802491
GTQ 7.675532
GYD 209.36909
HKD 7.78393
HNL 26.382819
HRK 6.412395
HTG 130.968506
HUF 327.720032
IDR 16694
ILS 3.186885
IMP 0.741981
INR 89.986896
IQD 1310.962883
IRR 42124.999703
ISK 125.469745
JEP 0.741981
JMD 159.029535
JOD 0.708977
JPY 156.875968
KES 129.090004
KGS 87.443499
KHR 4009.813693
KMF 420.000162
KPW 900.043914
KRW 1444.640263
KWD 0.30769
KYD 0.833994
KZT 507.398605
LAK 21633.571009
LBP 89616.523195
LKR 309.880992
LRD 178.128754
LSL 16.565363
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.41968
MAD 9.125364
MDL 16.842652
MGA 4593.353608
MKD 52.457549
MMK 2099.836459
MNT 3559.101845
MOP 8.023887
MRU 39.738642
MUR 46.250242
MVR 15.450308
MWK 1735.285849
MXN 18.022855
MYR 4.057974
MZN 63.910122
NAD 16.565293
NGN 1445.369948
NIO 36.826906
NOK 10.08779
NPR 144.120729
NZD 1.738325
OMR 0.384498
PAB 1.000716
PEN 3.366031
PGK 4.262823
PHP 58.878499
PKR 280.231968
PLN 3.596301
PYG 6569.722371
QAR 3.640127
RON 4.340796
RSD 99.959879
RUB 79.099677
RWF 1458.083093
SAR 3.750501
SBD 8.136831
SCR 13.817038
SDG 601.49594
SEK 9.22704
SGD 1.28666
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.050342
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 570.932045
SRD 38.126502
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.871136
SVC 8.756506
SYP 11059.149576
SZL 16.560607
THB 31.488016
TJS 9.241824
TMT 3.51
TND 2.91815
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.955702
TTD 6.802286
TWD 31.384501
TZS 2470.315975
UAH 42.338589
UGX 3623.089636
UYU 39.186789
UZS 12013.255301
VES 297.770445
VND 26300
VUV 120.744286
WST 2.776281
XAF 558.798674
XAG 0.013939
XAU 0.000231
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803607
XDR 0.694966
XOF 558.798674
XPF 101.595577
YER 238.450113
ZAR 16.57019
ZMK 9001.197928
ZMW 22.191554
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    -0.4900

    80.03

    -0.61%

  • BTI

    0.0700

    56.62

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    -0.0334

    22.65

    -0.15%

  • RBGPF

    0.3400

    81.05

    +0.42%

  • NGG

    -0.4200

    77.35

    -0.54%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • GSK

    -0.2600

    49.04

    -0.53%

  • BCC

    -0.1900

    73.6

    -0.26%

  • BP

    -0.0200

    34.73

    -0.06%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    15.5

    +0.32%

  • AZN

    -0.5800

    91.93

    -0.63%

  • RELX

    -0.6900

    40.42

    -1.71%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    13.61

    +0.22%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    23.15

    +0.09%

  • BCE

    0.2500

    23.82

    +1.05%

  • VOD

    -0.0200

    13.21

    -0.15%


Milei suffers crushing Defeat




Argentina’s political earthquake arrived in its largest province. In Buenos Aires—home to roughly two out of every five Argentines and a third of national output—voters delivered a decisive rebuke to President Javier Milei’s libertarian experiment. The opposition’s double‑digit win there has redefined the battlefield ahead of the October 26 midterms and raised the most consequential question of Milei’s tenure: has the shock‑therapy project reached its political limits, or can it be reshaped to survive?

The weekend vote was more than a provincial skirmish. Buenos Aires Province is the bellwether of national mood, the place where governing coalitions are tested against kitchen‑table realities. Since taking office in December 2023, Milei has cut public spending, torn up regulations, and promised to “chainsaw” a bloated state. The promise was stabilization and a return to growth. The reality, for now, is disinflation alongside recessionary pain—and a public impatient with the trade‑offs.

The defeat capped a brutal week in Congress. Senators in a rare show of cross‑party force overturned the president’s veto of an emergency law for people with disabilities, the first time lawmakers have reversed a veto in his term. That vote exposed a governing weakness that polls had long foreshadowed: with only a small minority in the legislature, the administration needs allies to pass—or defend—its agenda. Without them, vetoes can be overridden and decrees can be struck down, turning executive maximalism into legislative stasis.

The economic fallout was immediate. Investors who had priced in a tighter race in Buenos Aires marked down Argentine assets: the peso slid, local stocks tumbled, and dollar bonds sank. Those moves do not merely reflect skittish traders; they speak to a deeper concern about policy durability. Stabilization plans succeed when markets, businesses, and households believe governments can stick with them through the next election. A double‑digit loss in the country’s biggest province—on the eve of national midterms—casts doubt on that belief.

Yet the macro scoreboard holds genuine wins. Monthly inflation, once galloping, is now down to the low single digits, with August clocking in at 1.9% and the annual rate falling to the mid‑30s—its lowest in years. That is not trivial in a country battered by recurring price spirals. But stabilization has not felt like relief. Unemployment climbed earlier this year, real wages are fragile, and public services—from universities to hospitals—have become flashpoints in street politics and Senate votes alike. In short, disinflation without growth has proved a hard sell.

Politically, the map is shifting. The Peronist opposition emerges emboldened and more unified in the province that most shapes national outcomes. Moderate center‑right blocs, kingmakers on pivotal bills, now see greater leverage in demanding changes to the government’s approach. Meanwhile, the administration is fending off an ethics storm tied to the disability agency that, regardless of legal outcomes, has further complicated coalition building. Governance in Argentina has always been a game of arithmetic; after Buenos Aires, the numbers look harsher for the Casa Rosada.

Milei’s response has been defiance and focus. He scrapped a high‑profile foreign trip and insisted the program will not retreat “one millimeter.” That message shores up his core base—and markets like clarity—but it also hardens the lines with potential legislative partners who bristle at being bulldozed. If the government wants to avoid paralysis, it faces a strategic choice: continue governing by confrontation, or translate a movement into a coalition that can last beyond a single news cycle.

What would a survivable version of the project look like? First, a pivot from chainsaw to scalpel: prioritize a handful of reforms with broad support (tax rationalization, simplification of import/export rules, and credible, rules‑based monetary policy) over sprawling omnibus fights that unify the opposition. Second, institutionalize the stabilization: codify fiscal rules, improve budget transparency, and pre‑agree social floors (for disability benefits, school meals, essential medicines) that take the sting out of austerity. Third, build a minimum viable coalition: offer procedural concessions in Congress and genuine co‑ownership of reforms to centrists who can deliver votes and legitimacy.

None of this is guaranteed. The midterms on October 26 could narrow or widen the path. A better‑than‑expected result for the ruling party would reduce veto risks and revive momentum; a worse‑than‑expected outcome would turn the next year into a trench war of vetoes, court challenges, and market flare‑ups. In either case, Argentina does not need to “fail again.” It needs a version of reform that is less theatrical and more durable—a politics that trades viral moments for legislative math.

The Buenos Aires result was a verdict on pace, priorities, and tone. It was not a binding judgment on whether Argentina must choose between stabilization and dignity. The question now is whether the president can adjust his method without abandoning his aim—turning a shock into a strategy, and a plurality into a governing majority. If he can, the project may yet outlast the week’s defeat. If he cannot, the defeat may define the project.