The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 67.701997
ALL 84.120616
AMD 376.86036
ANG 1.789699
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1354.222596
AUD 1.546791
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.687416
BBD 1.988007
BDT 120.374445
BGN 1.68952
BHD 0.371166
BIF 2935.507528
BMD 1
BND 1.278461
BOB 6.803848
BRL 5.538804
BSD 0.984686
BTN 86.116216
BWP 13.508477
BYN 3.222208
BYR 19600
BZD 1.977827
CAD 1.37995
CDF 2890.000362
CHF 0.803795
CLF 0.024709
CLP 958.992278
CNY 7.211804
CNH 7.19286
COP 4123.376903
CRC 497.476382
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.133946
CZK 21.201404
DJF 175.333247
DKK 6.439804
DOP 59.842112
DZD 130.120357
EGP 48.338726
ERN 15
ETB 135.820974
EUR 0.86255
FJD 2.261504
FKP 0.754031
GBP 0.752899
GEL 2.703861
GGP 0.754031
GHS 10.338639
GIP 0.754031
GMD 72.503851
GNF 8539.752383
GTQ 7.557051
GYD 205.99629
HKD 7.84915
HNL 25.874639
HRK 6.502404
HTG 128.898667
HUF 344.13504
IDR 16367.95
ILS 3.41469
IMP 0.754031
INR 87.167904
IQD 1289.849446
IRR 42112.503816
ISK 123.430386
JEP 0.754031
JMD 157.939692
JOD 0.70904
JPY 147.390385
KES 127.207627
KGS 87.450384
KHR 3945.472585
KMF 427.503794
KPW 899.997983
KRW 1389.030383
KWD 0.30527
KYD 0.8205
KZT 534.360036
LAK 21292.437772
LBP 88226.909969
LKR 296.665373
LRD 197.411673
LSL 18.03615
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.379406
MAD 9.016608
MDL 16.955265
MGA 4469.177344
MKD 53.112463
MMK 2098.596987
MNT 3590.521894
MOP 7.960657
MRU 39.275269
MUR 46.750378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1707.346534
MXN 18.858904
MYR 4.277504
MZN 63.960377
NAD 18.03615
NGN 1533.980377
NIO 36.236573
NOK 10.23875
NPR 137.786118
NZD 1.691189
OMR 0.378586
PAB 0.984599
PEN 3.537207
PGK 4.147362
PHP 57.766038
PKR 279.383202
PLN 3.686327
PYG 7375.005392
QAR 3.580087
RON 4.380304
RSD 101.065528
RUB 79.88758
RWF 1422.285492
SAR 3.750991
SBD 8.264604
SCR 14.458134
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.65361
SGD 1.290371
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.000338
SLL 20969.503947
SOS 562.702213
SRD 36.84037
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.138001
SVC 8.615677
SYP 13001.722914
SZL 18.031146
THB 32.475038
TJS 9.289763
TMT 3.51
TND 2.92895
TOP 2.342104
TRY 40.620504
TTD 6.673569
TWD 29.709038
TZS 2491.091842
UAH 41.159484
UGX 3529.614771
UYU 39.558259
UZS 12497.303826
VES 123.49336
VND 26220
VUV 120.138031
WST 2.775456
XAF 565.943661
XAG 0.027001
XAU 0.000297
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.774557
XDR 0.703852
XOF 565.943661
XPF 102.894612
YER 240.603589
ZAR 18.15613
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 22.522756
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    -0.1200

    59.65

    -0.2%

  • CMSC

    0.0200

    22.87

    +0.09%

  • NGG

    1.4300

    71.82

    +1.99%

  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • BTI

    0.6700

    54.35

    +1.23%

  • GSK

    0.4100

    37.56

    +1.09%

  • RYCEF

    0.0100

    14.19

    +0.07%

  • CMSD

    0.0800

    23.35

    +0.34%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    74.94

    0%

  • SCS

    -0.1500

    10.18

    -1.47%

  • BCC

    -0.4600

    83.35

    -0.55%

  • AZN

    0.8600

    73.95

    +1.16%

  • BP

    -0.4000

    31.75

    -1.26%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    13.1

    -0.23%

  • VOD

    0.1500

    10.96

    +1.37%

  • RELX

    -0.3000

    51.59

    -0.58%

  • BCE

    0.2400

    23.57

    +1.02%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.