The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.67305
AFN 66.494756
ALL 82.950034
AMD 382.750166
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.000208
ARS 1429.4913
AUD 1.520069
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.699074
BAM 1.68162
BBD 2.014711
BDT 121.818158
BGN 1.685196
BHD 0.376972
BIF 2950
BMD 1
BND 1.295909
BOB 6.911999
BRL 5.355398
BSD 1.000305
BTN 88.715398
BWP 13.317627
BYN 3.400126
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011788
CAD 1.39616
CDF 2410.000242
CHF 0.8026
CLF 0.024238
CLP 950.740178
CNY 7.1195
CNH 7.152101
COP 3893.5
CRC 503.419902
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.749997
CZK 21.009202
DJF 177.719786
DKK 6.43528
DOP 62.69161
DZD 130.332023
EGP 47.561503
ERN 15
ETB 144.900199
EUR 0.86179
FJD 2.262959
FKP 0.743972
GBP 0.747685
GEL 2.715028
GGP 0.743972
GHS 12.459679
GIP 0.743972
GMD 72.49594
GNF 8675.000275
GTQ 7.664364
GYD 209.277331
HKD 7.781495
HNL 26.239975
HRK 6.489304
HTG 130.889175
HUF 337.31605
IDR 16602.1
ILS 3.280395
IMP 0.743972
INR 88.79365
IQD 1310
IRR 42060.000033
ISK 121.860215
JEP 0.743972
JMD 160.105585
JOD 0.709017
JPY 152.872504
KES 129.504341
KGS 87.449897
KHR 4020.999581
KMF 422.999919
KPW 900.00029
KRW 1424.590298
KWD 0.30654
KYD 0.833588
KZT 540.426209
LAK 21674.999992
LBP 89550.000124
LKR 302.688202
LRD 182.650183
LSL 17.24023
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.414986
MAD 9.114976
MDL 16.979567
MGA 4476.000336
MKD 53.09807
MMK 2099.241766
MNT 3597.321295
MOP 8.018916
MRU 39.874966
MUR 45.603383
MVR 15.298901
MWK 1736.501971
MXN 18.359345
MYR 4.215988
MZN 63.898444
NAD 17.239859
NGN 1470.049832
NIO 36.660071
NOK 9.99153
NPR 141.944637
NZD 1.731015
OMR 0.384497
PAB 1.000301
PEN 3.442502
PGK 4.183962
PHP 58.068985
PKR 281.200419
PLN 3.66519
PYG 6985.112356
QAR 3.640977
RON 4.390401
RSD 100.951991
RUB 81.452489
RWF 1448
SAR 3.750845
SBD 8.230542
SCR 14.435176
SDG 601.498985
SEK 9.451785
SGD 1.29658
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.319894
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.498241
SRD 38.152503
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.43
SVC 8.752886
SYP 13001.812646
SZL 17.240123
THB 32.530509
TJS 9.302695
TMT 3.5
TND 2.920503
TOP 2.342099
TRY 41.70141
TTD 6.792514
TWD 30.577015
TZS 2454.077992
UAH 41.479736
UGX 3435.808589
UYU 39.929667
UZS 12049.999907
VES 189.012825
VND 26360
VUV 121.219369
WST 2.770863
XAF 563.999673
XAG 0.020276
XAU 0.000247
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802768
XDR 0.699711
XOF 562.999848
XPF 102.8501
YER 239.039905
ZAR 17.16635
ZMK 9001.198196
ZMW 23.727269
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.1400

    23.88

    +0.59%

  • SCS

    -0.0200

    16.84

    -0.12%

  • AZN

    -0.6250

    85.245

    -0.73%

  • GSK

    -0.0250

    43.475

    -0.06%

  • NGG

    -0.4900

    73.39

    -0.67%

  • BP

    -0.4110

    34.559

    -1.19%

  • CMSD

    -0.0640

    24.336

    -0.26%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1900

    15.35

    -1.24%

  • RIO

    1.2150

    67.465

    +1.8%

  • BCC

    1.3300

    75.85

    +1.75%

  • RBGPF

    -1.0800

    77.14

    -1.4%

  • JRI

    0.0450

    14.115

    +0.32%

  • BTI

    -0.6050

    51.375

    -1.18%

  • BCE

    -0.2500

    23.04

    -1.09%

  • VOD

    -0.0080

    11.262

    -0.07%

  • RELX

    0.2050

    45.645

    +0.45%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.