The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.67295
AFN 65.497588
ALL 82.895554
AMD 379.419831
ANG 1.79008
AOA 917.000143
ARS 1441.975204
AUD 1.490691
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.724357
BAM 1.681194
BBD 2.013599
BDT 122.277236
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.37698
BIF 2960
BMD 1
BND 1.287328
BOB 6.908675
BRL 5.356702
BSD 0.999794
BTN 90.335891
BWP 13.350525
BYN 2.908006
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010788
CAD 1.389445
CDF 2199.999852
CHF 0.802903
CLF 0.022489
CLP 882.239371
CNY 6.97375
CNH 6.962015
COP 3679.7
CRC 494.610346
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.149727
CZK 20.90975
DJF 177.720251
DKK 6.43313
DOP 63.802616
DZD 130.269023
EGP 47.235698
ERN 15
ETB 155.149743
EUR 0.86097
FJD 2.27525
FKP 0.743872
GBP 0.74666
GEL 2.680288
GGP 0.743872
GHS 10.850005
GIP 0.743872
GMD 73.51793
GNF 8749.99998
GTQ 7.665859
GYD 209.162294
HKD 7.79746
HNL 26.509829
HRK 6.488503
HTG 130.993519
HUF 331.628498
IDR 16898.3
ILS 3.14311
IMP 0.743872
INR 90.35305
IQD 1310
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 125.880127
JEP 0.743872
JMD 157.623739
JOD 0.709019
JPY 158.4775
KES 129.000135
KGS 87.448899
KHR 4025.000031
KMF 423.501832
KPW 899.976543
KRW 1469.249837
KWD 0.30812
KYD 0.833129
KZT 510.839479
LAK 21604.999876
LBP 89549.999428
LKR 309.376451
LRD 180.750247
LSL 16.367862
LTL 2.952741
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.429747
MAD 9.212499
MDL 17.10614
MGA 4549.9997
MKD 53.013926
MMK 2100.072735
MNT 3563.033319
MOP 8.031719
MRU 39.740152
MUR 46.150064
MVR 15.45958
MWK 1732.505413
MXN 17.62524
MYR 4.0545
MZN 63.930447
NAD 16.398647
NGN 1421.720364
NIO 36.729861
NOK 10.106935
NPR 144.535561
NZD 1.739995
OMR 0.384494
PAB 0.999807
PEN 3.358967
PGK 4.26325
PHP 59.516496
PKR 279.875008
PLN 3.62796
PYG 6752.110303
QAR 3.641103
RON 4.382496
RSD 101.069036
RUB 78.248363
RWF 1457.5
SAR 3.750011
SBD 8.123611
SCR 15.113244
SDG 601.504446
SEK 9.22858
SGD 1.28754
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.150189
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 571.498
SRD 38.259967
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.4
SVC 8.748087
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.399211
THB 31.412971
TJS 9.312721
TMT 3.51
TND 2.890311
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.1885
TTD 6.786494
TWD 31.568497
TZS 2515.000378
UAH 43.484577
UGX 3549.263328
UYU 38.603866
UZS 12014.999851
VES 338.72556
VND 26270
VUV 121.157562
WST 2.784721
XAF 563.861501
XAG 0.010836
XAU 0.000217
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801881
XDR 0.700974
XOF 563.000155
XPF 102.924968
YER 238.449429
ZAR 16.32615
ZMK 9001.203608
ZMW 19.771
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -0.2100

    81.36

    -0.26%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1900

    16.95

    -1.12%

  • CMSC

    0.1400

    23.49

    +0.6%

  • RIO

    0.8900

    86.77

    +1.03%

  • RELX

    -0.0100

    41.91

    -0.02%

  • GSK

    -1.0750

    49.715

    -2.16%

  • NGG

    0.7000

    79.58

    +0.88%

  • BCC

    1.8650

    85.915

    +2.17%

  • CMSD

    0.0619

    23.97

    +0.26%

  • AZN

    -1.8400

    94.5

    -1.95%

  • JRI

    0.0135

    13.64

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    0.1600

    24.38

    +0.66%

  • VOD

    0.1100

    13.48

    +0.82%

  • BTI

    0.7750

    58.215

    +1.33%

  • BP

    -0.6450

    35.175

    -1.83%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.