The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.67307
AFN 68.480272
ALL 84.328736
AMD 382.918988
ANG 1.789699
AOA 917.000456
ARS 1357.52939
AUD 1.54691
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.700709
BAM 1.694735
BBD 2.019765
BDT 121.944985
BGN 1.694555
BHD 0.376969
BIF 2982.526829
BMD 1
BND 1.289107
BOB 6.912269
BRL 5.520402
BSD 1.000308
BTN 87.75145
BWP 13.585141
BYN 3.287192
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009393
CAD 1.37939
CDF 2890.000035
CHF 0.809395
CLF 0.024652
CLP 967.080249
CNY 7.17875
CNH 7.18991
COP 4098.84
CRC 505.435183
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.546534
CZK 21.309397
DJF 178.14095
DKK 6.463325
DOP 60.803522
DZD 130.34
EGP 48.401901
ERN 15
ETB 138.209964
EUR 0.86603
FJD 2.266104
FKP 0.752485
GBP 0.752885
GEL 2.706901
GGP 0.752485
GHS 10.553406
GIP 0.752485
GMD 72.506653
GNF 8676.438094
GTQ 7.674744
GYD 209.292653
HKD 7.84995
HNL 26.296202
HRK 6.531197
HTG 131.268711
HUF 345.574038
IDR 16378.85
ILS 3.449565
IMP 0.752485
INR 87.77885
IQD 1310.434169
IRR 42124.999587
ISK 123.489741
JEP 0.752485
JMD 160.063082
JOD 0.709015
JPY 147.598502
KES 129.197735
KGS 87.449886
KHR 4008.561303
KMF 427.500423
KPW 900.023324
KRW 1391.125025
KWD 0.30581
KYD 0.833601
KZT 537.911971
LAK 21642.418308
LBP 89631.250352
LKR 300.828824
LRD 200.56671
LSL 18.04921
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.445195
MAD 9.112383
MDL 17.030753
MGA 4449.62436
MKD 53.316812
MMK 2098.973477
MNT 3592.605619
MOP 8.088525
MRU 39.953381
MUR 46.030272
MVR 15.406935
MWK 1734.616951
MXN 18.89274
MYR 4.227499
MZN 63.959714
NAD 18.04921
NGN 1528.719928
NIO 36.809656
NOK 10.26878
NPR 140.403537
NZD 1.696165
OMR 0.384508
PAB 1.000321
PEN 3.573951
PGK 4.215607
PHP 57.674007
PKR 283.721519
PLN 3.703207
PYG 7492.775412
QAR 3.647951
RON 4.394896
RSD 101.476018
RUB 80.194836
RWF 1447.016109
SAR 3.751923
SBD 8.237372
SCR 14.693436
SDG 600.499811
SEK 9.67771
SGD 1.288291
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.949842
SLL 20969.503947
SOS 571.723185
SRD 36.839729
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.229675
SVC 8.752692
SYP 13002.222445
SZL 18.042624
THB 32.435962
TJS 9.41336
TMT 3.51
TND 2.949625
TOP 2.3421
TRY 40.669503
TTD 6.787371
TWD 29.92696
TZS 2485.00031
UAH 41.705046
UGX 3580.449636
UYU 40.154413
UZS 12626.024115
VES 126.12235
VND 26250
VUV 119.406554
WST 2.772467
XAF 568.405501
XAG 0.026694
XAU 0.000298
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80286
XDR 0.704914
XOF 568.398113
XPF 103.340858
YER 240.349691
ZAR 18.02395
ZMK 9001.198647
ZMW 23.033097
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    74.94

    0%

  • AZN

    0.6400

    74.59

    +0.86%

  • NGG

    0.8300

    72.65

    +1.14%

  • CMSC

    0.2000

    23.07

    +0.87%

  • GSK

    0.1200

    37.68

    +0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.6400

    82.71

    -0.77%

  • RIO

    0.3500

    60

    +0.58%

  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • SCS

    6.4000

    16.58

    +38.6%

  • BP

    0.7400

    32.49

    +2.28%

  • BTI

    1.2000

    55.55

    +2.16%

  • RELX

    0.3800

    51.97

    +0.73%

  • RYCEF

    0.3100

    14.5

    +2.14%

  • JRI

    0.1000

    13.2

    +0.76%

  • CMSD

    0.2800

    23.63

    +1.18%

  • VOD

    0.0800

    11.04

    +0.72%

  • BCE

    -0.2600

    23.31

    -1.12%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.