The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.673019
AFN 69.49884
ALL 84.202602
AMD 384.029946
ANG 1.789699
AOA 917.000353
ARS 1339.047775
AUD 1.54666
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.697943
BAM 1.694735
BBD 2.019765
BDT 121.944985
BGN 1.68965
BHD 0.377054
BIF 2948.5
BMD 1
BND 1.289107
BOB 6.912269
BRL 5.506496
BSD 1.000308
BTN 87.75145
BWP 13.585141
BYN 3.287192
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009393
CAD 1.37815
CDF 2890.000035
CHF 0.807298
CLF 0.024646
CLP 966.850248
CNY 7.184103
CNH 7.188425
COP 4089.55
CRC 505.435183
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.625001
CZK 21.254897
DJF 177.719765
DKK 6.445901
DOP 60.824995
DZD 130.345697
EGP 48.419897
ERN 15
ETB 138.65025
EUR 0.86401
FJD 2.263015
FKP 0.752485
GBP 0.752106
GEL 2.700271
GGP 0.752485
GHS 10.54954
GIP 0.752485
GMD 72.498782
GNF 8675.000077
GTQ 7.674744
GYD 209.292653
HKD 7.84971
HNL 26.350044
HRK 6.509006
HTG 131.268711
HUF 344.101516
IDR 16386.5
ILS 3.450525
IMP 0.752485
INR 87.72355
IQD 1310
IRR 42125.000095
ISK 123.380184
JEP 0.752485
JMD 160.063082
JOD 0.709031
JPY 147.554943
KES 129.501015
KGS 87.449613
KHR 4010.000062
KMF 425.495983
KPW 900.023324
KRW 1386.659456
KWD 0.30568
KYD 0.833601
KZT 537.911971
LAK 21600.000359
LBP 89549.999823
LKR 300.828824
LRD 201.000332
LSL 17.897326
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.604889
LYD 5.434986
MAD 9.08875
MDL 17.030753
MGA 4435.000063
MKD 53.316812
MMK 2098.973477
MNT 3592.605619
MOP 8.088525
MRU 39.90232
MUR 45.970243
MVR 15.395554
MWK 1736.497369
MXN 18.744302
MYR 4.227498
MZN 63.960124
NAD 17.89376
NGN 1528.591069
NIO 36.74989
NOK 10.259155
NPR 140.403537
NZD 1.694743
OMR 0.384512
PAB 1.000321
PEN 3.55498
PGK 4.135505
PHP 57.469719
PKR 282.550092
PLN 3.700289
PYG 7492.775412
QAR 3.6405
RON 4.384903
RSD 101.242989
RUB 79.993347
RWF 1441.5
SAR 3.752214
SBD 8.244163
SCR 14.145035
SDG 600.498155
SEK 9.67327
SGD 1.288095
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.098567
SLL 20969.503947
SOS 571.501191
SRD 36.969499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.485
SVC 8.752692
SYP 13002.222445
SZL 17.889895
THB 32.370248
TJS 9.41336
TMT 3.51
TND 2.899002
TOP 2.342098
TRY 40.66533
TTD 6.787371
TWD 29.926801
TZS 2469.999826
UAH 41.705046
UGX 3580.449636
UYU 40.154413
UZS 12624.999907
VES 126.950815
VND 26250
VUV 119.406554
WST 2.772467
XAF 568.405501
XAG 0.026442
XAU 0.000296
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80286
XDR 0.704914
XOF 567.497249
XPF 103.425017
YER 240.349792
ZAR 17.909704
ZMK 9001.202791
ZMW 23.033097
ZWL 321.999592
  • BCC

    4.0600

    86.77

    +4.68%

  • NGG

    -0.3700

    72.28

    -0.51%

  • BTI

    0.2900

    55.84

    +0.52%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    23.07

    0%

  • CMSD

    -0.1200

    23.51

    -0.51%

  • RIO

    -0.3000

    59.7

    -0.5%

  • BP

    1.1100

    33.6

    +3.3%

  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • JRI

    0.0600

    13.26

    +0.45%

  • SCS

    -0.6200

    15.96

    -3.88%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1500

    14.35

    -1.05%

  • AZN

    -0.1100

    74.48

    -0.15%

  • GSK

    -0.3600

    37.32

    -0.96%

  • RBGPF

    -0.0800

    74.92

    -0.11%

  • BCE

    0.2500

    23.56

    +1.06%

  • VOD

    0.0600

    11.1

    +0.54%

  • RELX

    -1.3800

    50.59

    -2.73%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.