The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.67295
AFN 65.498872
ALL 83.009983
AMD 379.420226
ANG 1.79008
AOA 918.000149
ARS 1442.012403
AUD 1.492965
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.701923
BAM 1.681194
BBD 2.013599
BDT 122.277236
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.377027
BIF 2960
BMD 1
BND 1.287328
BOB 6.908675
BRL 5.369403
BSD 0.999794
BTN 90.335891
BWP 13.350525
BYN 2.908006
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010788
CAD 1.389635
CDF 2205.000028
CHF 0.803603
CLF 0.022508
CLP 883.000089
CNY 6.9664
CNH 6.9635
COP 3689
CRC 494.610346
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.295771
CZK 20.92398
DJF 177.71979
DKK 6.437945
DOP 63.750091
DZD 130.295066
EGP 47.237602
ERN 15
ETB 155.624996
EUR 0.86169
FJD 2.2795
FKP 0.743872
GBP 0.747495
GEL 2.694987
GGP 0.743872
GHS 10.815003
GIP 0.743872
GMD 73.499737
GNF 8750.999938
GTQ 7.665859
GYD 209.162294
HKD 7.79695
HNL 26.530085
HRK 6.491598
HTG 130.993519
HUF 331.914496
IDR 16886
ILS 3.14311
IMP 0.743872
INR 90.35325
IQD 1310
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 125.96997
JEP 0.743872
JMD 157.623739
JOD 0.709
JPY 158.667501
KES 128.999873
KGS 87.448902
KHR 4025.999816
KMF 424.000005
KPW 899.976543
KRW 1469.50058
KWD 0.30817
KYD 0.833129
KZT 510.839479
LAK 21599.999945
LBP 89966.784279
LKR 309.376451
LRD 181.125015
LSL 16.33039
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.425003
MAD 9.23625
MDL 17.10614
MGA 4549.999512
MKD 53.045449
MMK 2100.072735
MNT 3563.033319
MOP 8.031719
MRU 39.739969
MUR 46.149442
MVR 15.449996
MWK 1732.999978
MXN 17.66371
MYR 4.054501
MZN 63.910411
NAD 16.330084
NGN 1422.880467
NIO 36.749914
NOK 10.117255
NPR 144.535561
NZD 1.74278
OMR 0.384499
PAB 0.999807
PEN 3.360058
PGK 4.269674
PHP 59.484008
PKR 279.892332
PLN 3.63014
PYG 6752.110303
QAR 3.64125
RON 4.385497
RSD 101.13198
RUB 78.246296
RWF 1458
SAR 3.750011
SBD 8.130216
SCR 14.125058
SDG 601.000182
SEK 9.228825
SGD 1.288275
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.125017
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 571.000184
SRD 38.259862
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.45
SVC 8.748087
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.330167
THB 31.390384
TJS 9.312721
TMT 3.5
TND 2.892498
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.182699
TTD 6.786494
TWD 31.573297
TZS 2515.000082
UAH 43.484577
UGX 3549.263328
UYU 38.603866
UZS 11975.000153
VES 338.72555
VND 26270
VUV 121.157562
WST 2.784721
XAF 563.861501
XAG 0.010813
XAU 0.000217
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801881
XDR 0.700974
XOF 562.499892
XPF 102.999713
YER 238.424949
ZAR 16.3383
ZMK 9001.196579
ZMW 19.771
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -0.2100

    81.36

    -0.26%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1900

    16.95

    -1.12%

  • CMSC

    0.1500

    23.55

    +0.64%

  • BCC

    2.2200

    86.27

    +2.57%

  • GSK

    -1.6700

    49.12

    -3.4%

  • RELX

    -0.0700

    41.85

    -0.17%

  • NGG

    0.4800

    79.36

    +0.6%

  • BCE

    0.0200

    24.24

    +0.08%

  • JRI

    -0.0865

    13.54

    -0.64%

  • RIO

    0.4700

    86.35

    +0.54%

  • BTI

    0.6400

    58.08

    +1.1%

  • VOD

    0.0800

    13.45

    +0.59%

  • CMSD

    0.0719

    23.98

    +0.3%

  • AZN

    -2.3500

    93.99

    -2.5%

  • BP

    -0.6700

    35.15

    -1.91%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.