The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.67241
AFN 69.726577
ALL 84.580014
AMD 382.790406
ANG 1.789623
AOA 916.000058
ARS 1182.2388
AUD 1.53198
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.704183
BAM 1.688822
BBD 2.018142
BDT 122.249135
BGN 1.688881
BHD 0.377194
BIF 2976.232109
BMD 1
BND 1.27971
BOB 6.921831
BRL 5.533797
BSD 0.999486
BTN 85.958163
BWP 13.345422
BYN 3.271062
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007728
CAD 1.356475
CDF 2876.999499
CHF 0.811345
CLF 0.024423
CLP 937.230151
CNY 7.181597
CNH 7.181825
COP 4122.55
CRC 503.844676
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.216507
CZK 21.40675
DJF 177.993653
DKK 6.44289
DOP 58.915719
DZD 130.011972
EGP 50.258201
ERN 15
ETB 136.563694
EUR 0.86386
FJD 2.24175
FKP 0.736284
GBP 0.736325
GEL 2.739802
GGP 0.736284
GHS 10.295534
GIP 0.736284
GMD 70.499815
GNF 8660.285222
GTQ 7.681581
GYD 209.114263
HKD 7.84986
HNL 26.087032
HRK 6.510201
HTG 130.801014
HUF 346.887985
IDR 16287
ILS 3.52115
IMP 0.736284
INR 86.04255
IQD 1309.391717
IRR 42099.999662
ISK 124.220056
JEP 0.736284
JMD 159.534737
JOD 0.709013
JPY 144.182495
KES 129.219705
KGS 87.450028
KHR 4001.467953
KMF 426.504011
KPW 900
KRW 1359.314973
KWD 0.305903
KYD 0.832934
KZT 512.565895
LAK 21561.643244
LBP 89558.448287
LKR 300.951131
LRD 199.909332
LSL 17.782201
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.425523
MAD 9.103626
MDL 17.092157
MGA 4438.399931
MKD 53.165749
MMK 2099.907788
MNT 3581.247911
MOP 8.081774
MRU 39.572225
MUR 45.250025
MVR 15.405016
MWK 1733.221078
MXN 18.909503
MYR 4.240496
MZN 63.949852
NAD 17.782201
NGN 1546.410082
NIO 36.784547
NOK 9.906139
NPR 137.533407
NZD 1.65127
OMR 0.384496
PAB 0.999503
PEN 3.618529
PGK 4.113794
PHP 56.455503
PKR 282.963746
PLN 3.68385
PYG 7973.439139
QAR 3.655212
RON 4.340797
RSD 101.240267
RUB 78.752008
RWF 1443.343479
SAR 3.752192
SBD 8.347391
SCR 14.449086
SDG 600.500523
SEK 9.46954
SGD 1.280035
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.049769
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.206528
SRD 37.527997
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745774
SYP 13001.9038
SZL 17.774017
THB 32.477501
TJS 10.125468
TMT 3.5
TND 2.94987
TOP 2.342099
TRY 39.39642
TTD 6.785398
TWD 29.505394
TZS 2579.431949
UAH 41.557366
UGX 3603.362447
UYU 40.870605
UZS 12753.70328
VES 102.166996
VND 26061.5
VUV 119.102474
WST 2.619188
XAF 566.420137
XAG 0.027505
XAU 0.000293
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.70726
XOF 566.43481
XPF 102.980351
YER 243.350351
ZAR 17.780202
ZMK 9001.210419
ZMW 24.238499
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.