The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.673043
AFN 71.493717
ALL 87.061306
AMD 390.195672
ANG 1.80229
AOA 916.000129
ARS 1176.250502
AUD 1.56634
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.69516
BAM 1.726572
BBD 2.025239
BDT 121.869938
BGN 1.72588
BHD 0.378378
BIF 2936
BMD 1
BND 1.310499
BOB 6.930829
BRL 5.679401
BSD 1.003041
BTN 84.76692
BWP 13.730882
BYN 3.282528
BYR 19600
BZD 2.014822
CAD 1.384795
CDF 2873.000262
CHF 0.8295
CLF 0.024698
CLP 947.760276
CNY 7.27135
CNH 7.278315
COP 4198.84
CRC 506.631944
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.341461
CZK 22.080018
DJF 177.720056
DKK 6.60857
DOP 59.032023
DZD 133.150199
EGP 50.982704
ERN 15
ETB 134.606849
EUR 0.885475
FJD 2.25945
FKP 0.749663
GBP 0.75285
GEL 2.745024
GGP 0.749663
GHS 14.293344
GIP 0.749663
GMD 71.502932
GNF 8687.515173
GTQ 7.724462
GYD 210.484964
HKD 7.75705
HNL 26.029114
HRK 6.670101
HTG 131.035244
HUF 358.171991
IDR 16613
ILS 3.61543
IMP 0.749663
INR 84.69705
IQD 1313.73847
IRR 42112.488092
ISK 129.020049
JEP 0.749663
JMD 158.78775
JOD 0.709203
JPY 145.526505
KES 129.839941
KGS 87.450213
KHR 4014.741906
KMF 434.509021
KPW 900.011381
KRW 1435.859762
KWD 0.306502
KYD 0.835783
KZT 514.647601
LAK 21686.066272
LBP 89872.479044
LKR 300.259103
LRD 200.606481
LSL 18.677031
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.604891
LYD 5.475147
MAD 9.307539
MDL 17.217315
MGA 4453.70399
MKD 54.528135
MMK 2099.538189
MNT 3574.392419
MOP 8.012798
MRU 39.770129
MUR 45.080228
MVR 15.41009
MWK 1739.283964
MXN 19.606894
MYR 4.330144
MZN 64.000202
NAD 18.673816
NGN 1606.349933
NIO 36.90936
NOK 10.445355
NPR 135.627425
NZD 1.692175
OMR 0.386442
PAB 1.003032
PEN 3.677638
PGK 4.095253
PHP 55.888037
PKR 281.827034
PLN 3.79539
PYG 8033.511218
QAR 3.655833
RON 4.407695
RSD 103.446754
RUB 82.248708
RWF 1440.892679
SAR 3.750492
SBD 8.361298
SCR 14.280329
SDG 600.497158
SEK 9.75945
SGD 1.311575
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.789669
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 573.196677
SRD 36.846974
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.775321
SYP 13002.38052
SZL 18.660534
THB 33.589768
TJS 10.571919
TMT 3.5
TND 2.978994
TOP 2.342103
TRY 38.574102
TTD 6.792886
TWD 32.127802
TZS 2684.082016
UAH 41.609923
UGX 3674.195442
UYU 42.206459
UZS 12970.563573
VES 86.73797
VND 26005
VUV 120.584578
WST 2.773259
XAF 579.073422
XAG 0.030825
XAU 0.000309
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.722907
XOF 579.08109
XPF 105.265016
YER 244.950332
ZAR 18.55441
ZMK 9001.198241
ZMW 27.90983
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0200

    22.03

    +0.09%

  • RBGPF

    67.2100

    67.21

    +100%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    22.26

    -0.18%

  • NGG

    -1.3500

    71.65

    -1.88%

  • RELX

    -0.5500

    54.08

    -1.02%

  • GSK

    -1.1000

    38.75

    -2.84%

  • RIO

    -0.8500

    58.55

    -1.45%

  • AZN

    -1.2800

    70.51

    -1.82%

  • BCC

    -0.5700

    92.71

    -0.61%

  • SCS

    -0.0500

    9.87

    -0.51%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1000

    10.12

    -0.99%

  • BTI

    -0.2500

    43.3

    -0.58%

  • JRI

    0.1000

    13.01

    +0.77%

  • BCE

    -0.8100

    21.44

    -3.78%

  • BP

    0.4200

    27.88

    +1.51%

  • VOD

    -0.0300

    9.73

    -0.31%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.