The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 65.499613
ALL 83.268
AMD 380.541304
ANG 1.79008
AOA 918.000324
ARS 1442.037202
AUD 1.491369
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.700092
BAM 1.684996
BBD 2.018161
BDT 122.553771
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.377043
BIF 2966.361251
BMD 1
BND 1.290239
BOB 6.92418
BRL 5.372601
BSD 1.002059
BTN 90.539021
BWP 13.380603
BYN 2.914595
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015318
CAD 1.38883
CDF 2204.999807
CHF 0.801602
CLF 0.022546
CLP 884.510101
CNY 6.966397
CNH 6.965105
COP 3685.86
CRC 495.728926
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.99748
CZK 20.897801
DJF 178.43389
DKK 6.42964
DOP 63.908884
DZD 130.215013
EGP 47.241986
ERN 15
ETB 155.883141
EUR 0.86058
FJD 2.279502
FKP 0.74706
GBP 0.745955
GEL 2.694946
GGP 0.74706
GHS 10.826947
GIP 0.74706
GMD 73.496825
GNF 8772.179217
GTQ 7.683195
GYD 209.638025
HKD 7.799845
HNL 26.425953
HRK 6.483599
HTG 131.289765
HUF 331.45201
IDR 16914.1
ILS 3.13765
IMP 0.74706
INR 90.773502
IQD 1312.639192
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 125.82009
JEP 0.74706
JMD 157.980891
JOD 0.708985
JPY 158.15403
KES 128.999704
KGS 87.449763
KHR 4029.412905
KMF 423.999745
KPW 900.008925
KRW 1472.699636
KWD 0.30804
KYD 0.835003
KZT 511.994762
LAK 21669.40205
LBP 89732.49132
LKR 310.076117
LRD 180.362966
LSL 16.401098
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.444943
MAD 9.239133
MDL 17.144605
MGA 4652.32487
MKD 52.966029
MMK 2099.811473
MNT 3562.208717
MOP 8.04978
MRU 39.790129
MUR 46.302996
MVR 15.449577
MWK 1737.197601
MXN 17.66833
MYR 4.057503
MZN 63.910338
NAD 16.401098
NGN 1422.94013
NIO 36.873823
NOK 10.07969
NPR 144.862434
NZD 1.734745
OMR 0.384505
PAB 1.002055
PEN 3.366632
PGK 4.279259
PHP 59.378497
PKR 280.420174
PLN 3.63716
PYG 6767.409603
QAR 3.663604
RON 4.380977
RSD 100.975972
RUB 77.75003
RWF 1461.002318
SAR 3.74993
SBD 8.130216
SCR 13.599728
SDG 600.999746
SEK 9.21762
SGD 1.28767
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.125041
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 571.63288
SRD 38.259598
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.107679
SVC 8.767872
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.394276
THB 31.394756
TJS 9.333902
TMT 3.5
TND 2.936121
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.278703
TTD 6.801842
TWD 31.589502
TZS 2517.493009
UAH 43.583669
UGX 3557.290119
UYU 38.691668
UZS 12026.207984
VES 338.72555
VND 26275
VUV 121.060293
WST 2.785521
XAF 565.134271
XAG 0.011013
XAU 0.000217
XCD 2.702551
XCG 1.805956
XDR 0.702846
XOF 565.134271
XPF 102.747014
YER 238.424986
ZAR 16.380301
ZMK 9001.201015
ZMW 19.815458
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    2.6800

    84.04

    +3.19%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    0.1500

    23.55

    +0.64%

  • BCC

    2.2200

    86.27

    +2.57%

  • GSK

    -1.6700

    49.12

    -3.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0719

    23.98

    +0.3%

  • RIO

    0.4700

    86.35

    +0.54%

  • BCE

    0.0200

    24.24

    +0.08%

  • NGG

    0.4800

    79.36

    +0.6%

  • AZN

    -2.3500

    93.99

    -2.5%

  • BTI

    0.6400

    58.08

    +1.1%

  • RELX

    -0.0700

    41.85

    -0.17%

  • JRI

    -0.0865

    13.54

    -0.64%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0100

    17.03

    -0.06%

  • VOD

    0.0800

    13.45

    +0.59%

  • BP

    -0.6700

    35.15

    -1.91%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.