The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 70.516915
ALL 85.302355
AMD 383.760092
ANG 1.789623
AOA 917.00046
ARS 1182.280802
AUD 1.536405
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.701488
BAM 1.688822
BBD 2.018142
BDT 122.249135
BGN 1.6915
BHD 0.377029
BIF 2942
BMD 1
BND 1.27971
BOB 6.921831
BRL 5.492837
BSD 0.999486
BTN 85.958163
BWP 13.345422
BYN 3.271062
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007728
CAD 1.35789
CDF 2877.000125
CHF 0.813745
CLF 0.024399
CLP 936.297091
CNY 7.17975
CNH 7.183545
COP 4100.5
CRC 503.844676
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.624993
CZK 21.491985
DJF 177.719657
DKK 6.45675
DOP 59.250392
DZD 129.793835
EGP 50.252403
ERN 15
ETB 134.296424
EUR 0.86568
FJD 2.244203
FKP 0.736284
GBP 0.73725
GEL 2.724989
GGP 0.736284
GHS 10.275031
GIP 0.736284
GMD 71.495179
GNF 8656.000064
GTQ 7.681581
GYD 209.114263
HKD 7.849625
HNL 26.150235
HRK 6.521699
HTG 130.801014
HUF 348.239393
IDR 16304.5
ILS 3.486315
IMP 0.736284
INR 86.10465
IQD 1310
IRR 42109.999582
ISK 124.31972
JEP 0.736284
JMD 159.534737
JOD 0.709022
JPY 144.736496
KES 129.499459
KGS 87.449902
KHR 4020.000129
KMF 425.506766
KPW 900
KRW 1360.97024
KWD 0.30607
KYD 0.832934
KZT 512.565895
LAK 21677.477673
LBP 89599.999955
LKR 300.951131
LRD 199.650161
LSL 17.819752
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.425003
MAD 9.122502
MDL 17.092157
MGA 4434.999992
MKD 53.24005
MMK 2099.907788
MNT 3581.247911
MOP 8.081774
MRU 39.670046
MUR 45.299501
MVR 15.404989
MWK 1735.999959
MXN 18.92953
MYR 4.248983
MZN 63.949578
NAD 17.819743
NGN 1542.990064
NIO 36.296797
NOK 9.915945
NPR 137.533407
NZD 1.65307
OMR 0.384498
PAB 0.999503
PEN 3.603044
PGK 4.121898
PHP 56.449028
PKR 283.09739
PLN 3.698796
PYG 7973.439139
QAR 3.6405
RON 4.346803
RSD 101.458246
RUB 78.625661
RWF 1425
SAR 3.751855
SBD 8.347391
SCR 14.674991
SDG 600.501353
SEK 9.493599
SGD 1.28162
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.225024
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.497373
SRD 38.740973
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745774
SYP 13001.9038
SZL 17.81994
THB 32.438976
TJS 10.125468
TMT 3.5
TND 2.9225
TOP 2.3421
TRY 39.394298
TTD 6.785398
TWD 29.089502
TZS 2579.431974
UAH 41.557366
UGX 3603.362447
UYU 40.870605
UZS 12729.999756
VES 102.167025
VND 26061.5
VUV 119.102474
WST 2.619188
XAF 566.420137
XAG 0.02756
XAU 0.000294
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.70726
XOF 565.000024
XPF 103.599219
YER 242.950262
ZAR 17.82615
ZMK 9001.198905
ZMW 24.238499
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.