The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672495
AFN 67.899712
ALL 84.400226
AMD 377.936405
ANG 1.789699
AOA 917.000003
ARS 1357.482503
AUD 1.54385
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.700461
BAM 1.692352
BBD 1.99383
BDT 120.727027
BGN 1.68864
BHD 0.376982
BIF 2944.13125
BMD 1
BND 1.282217
BOB 6.823747
BRL 5.498897
BSD 0.98757
BTN 86.362103
BWP 13.548044
BYN 3.231618
BYR 19600
BZD 1.98362
CAD 1.376435
CDF 2890.000084
CHF 0.806992
CLF 0.024644
CLP 966.780045
CNY 7.17875
CNH 7.17974
COP 4098.65
CRC 498.929197
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.412185
CZK 21.219818
DJF 177.719741
DKK 6.44035
DOP 60.016873
DZD 130.151673
EGP 48.445496
ERN 15
ETB 136.2188
EUR 0.86301
FJD 2.261502
FKP 0.753073
GBP 0.751815
GEL 2.700733
GGP 0.753073
GHS 10.368877
GIP 0.753073
GMD 72.498951
GNF 8564.839853
GTQ 7.578629
GYD 206.59877
HKD 7.84956
HNL 25.950427
HRK 6.504597
HTG 129.278455
HUF 344.290236
IDR 16368.5
ILS 3.42084
IMP 0.753073
INR 87.89375
IQD 1293.627479
IRR 42124.999686
ISK 123.409695
JEP 0.753073
JMD 158.402305
JOD 0.709032
JPY 146.702006
KES 129.198816
KGS 87.450233
KHR 3957.097552
KMF 427.498679
KPW 900
KRW 1382.60986
KWD 0.30548
KYD 0.822903
KZT 535.920566
LAK 21354.619595
LBP 88484.565297
LKR 297.531746
LRD 197.975341
LSL 17.929993
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.395162
MAD 9.07625
MDL 17.004781
MGA 4482.267785
MKD 53.176318
MMK 2099.091991
MNT 3591.910261
MOP 7.983975
MRU 39.898884
MUR 46.249746
MVR 15.401353
MWK 1712.347436
MXN 18.881369
MYR 4.236019
MZN 63.960062
NAD 17.930185
NGN 1522.680391
NIO 36.342712
NOK 10.252365
NPR 138.1897
NZD 1.689061
OMR 0.384493
PAB 0.987479
PEN 3.63305
PGK 4.131498
PHP 57.455004
PKR 282.700338
PLN 3.689039
PYG 7396.607148
QAR 3.590558
RON 4.379497
RSD 101.135995
RUB 79.82257
RWF 1441
SAR 3.751651
SBD 8.237372
SCR 14.687898
SDG 600.50421
SEK 9.640198
SGD 1.286385
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.949931
SLL 20969.503947
SOS 564.350396
SRD 36.840603
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.57
SVC 8.640912
SYP 13001.907548
SZL 17.929726
THB 32.290071
TJS 9.316288
TMT 3.51
TND 2.879498
TOP 2.342103
TRY 40.68518
TTD 6.693058
TWD 29.899099
TZS 2520.546014
UAH 41.280042
UGX 3539.937872
UYU 39.671209
UZS 12533.909048
VES 126.12235
VND 26176.5
VUV 120.586342
WST 2.775485
XAF 567.601338
XAG 0.026719
XAU 0.000296
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.779755
XDR 0.705914
XOF 567.601338
XPF 104.5159
YER 240.349938
ZAR 17.905899
ZMK 9001.196279
ZMW 22.588726
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCU

    0.0000

    12.72

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    74.94

    0%

  • BCC

    -0.6400

    82.71

    -0.77%

  • NGG

    0.8300

    72.65

    +1.14%

  • CMSD

    0.2800

    23.63

    +1.18%

  • AZN

    0.6400

    74.59

    +0.86%

  • BCE

    -0.2600

    23.31

    -1.12%

  • RIO

    0.3500

    60

    +0.58%

  • RELX

    0.3800

    51.97

    +0.73%

  • CMSC

    0.2000

    23.07

    +0.87%

  • GSK

    0.1200

    37.68

    +0.32%

  • RYCEF

    0.3100

    14.5

    +2.14%

  • JRI

    0.1000

    13.2

    +0.76%

  • SCS

    6.4000

    16.58

    +38.6%

  • BTI

    1.2000

    55.55

    +2.16%

  • VOD

    0.0800

    11.04

    +0.72%

  • BP

    0.7400

    32.49

    +2.28%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.