The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 66.073829
ALL 83.219163
AMD 379.226554
ANG 1.790055
AOA 916.000238
ARS 1449.988198
AUD 1.526391
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.699188
BAM 1.685279
BBD 2.007204
BDT 121.781615
BGN 1.68225
BHD 0.376974
BIF 2943.50061
BMD 1
BND 1.294234
BOB 6.886568
BRL 5.331714
BSD 0.99651
BTN 89.134181
BWP 14.257895
BYN 2.900079
BYR 19600
BZD 2.00436
CAD 1.39744
CDF 2200.99981
CHF 0.80249
CLF 0.023583
CLP 925.21014
CNY 7.07555
CNH 7.06873
COP 3734.97
CRC 496.846241
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.013442
CZK 20.79335
DJF 177.458963
DKK 6.42318
DOP 62.428911
DZD 130.121446
EGP 47.5215
ERN 15
ETB 153.794592
EUR 0.86002
FJD 2.2697
FKP 0.755396
GBP 0.755502
GEL 2.695715
GGP 0.755396
GHS 11.29149
GIP 0.755396
GMD 72.492693
GNF 8658.187709
GTQ 7.634509
GYD 208.501361
HKD 7.78855
HNL 26.242546
HRK 6.479305
HTG 130.417735
HUF 327.382992
IDR 16625.85
ILS 3.265425
IMP 0.755396
INR 89.526651
IQD 1305.53545
IRR 42100.000014
ISK 127.630157
JEP 0.755396
JMD 159.566401
JOD 0.709031
JPY 155.0775
KES 129.249733
KGS 87.449975
KHR 3987.332227
KMF 425.00022
KPW 899.999876
KRW 1467.590532
KWD 0.30692
KYD 0.83049
KZT 511.503464
LAK 21633.405715
LBP 89253.438114
LKR 307.120946
LRD 176.89484
LSL 17.066229
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.433631
MAD 9.245683
MDL 16.926895
MGA 4475.579912
MKD 53.066699
MMK 2099.818305
MNT 3556.474491
MOP 7.993055
MRU 39.764071
MUR 46.159706
MVR 15.383085
MWK 1728.104643
MXN 18.289294
MYR 4.130982
MZN 63.910168
NAD 17.066229
NGN 1443.199295
NIO 36.673215
NOK 10.128055
NPR 142.614518
NZD 1.74367
OMR 0.384506
PAB 0.996622
PEN 3.354014
PGK 4.283425
PHP 58.515496
PKR 281.55185
PLN 3.636915
PYG 6969.289629
QAR 3.632423
RON 4.377797
RSD 100.931056
RUB 77.725662
RWF 1449.522628
SAR 3.752817
SBD 8.230592
SCR 14.879417
SDG 601.509811
SEK 9.432075
SGD 1.294975
SHP 0.750259
SLE 22.960075
SLL 20969.498139
SOS 568.538241
SRD 38.483971
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.111226
SVC 8.720229
SYP 11058.436115
SZL 17.07811
THB 31.95598
TJS 9.218368
TMT 3.51
TND 2.940837
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.448199
TTD 6.755592
TWD 31.395983
TZS 2463.283978
UAH 42.159291
UGX 3622.514045
UYU 39.62017
UZS 11861.923965
VES 245.362601
VND 26370
VUV 121.835157
WST 2.805025
XAF 565.226795
XAG 0.01741
XAU 0.000235
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.796091
XDR 0.702961
XOF 565.212184
XPF 102.764278
YER 238.300796
ZAR 17.08984
ZMK 9001.179251
ZMW 22.846655
ZWL 321.999592
  • RYCEF

    -0.2900

    13.61

    -2.13%

  • BCC

    0.1200

    76.14

    +0.16%

  • SCS

    0.0250

    16.315

    +0.15%

  • RIO

    0.9050

    72.855

    +1.24%

  • GSK

    -0.0500

    47.81

    -0.1%

  • AZN

    -0.4200

    92.31

    -0.45%

  • RELX

    -0.1700

    40.04

    -0.42%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    23.41

    0%

  • NGG

    -0.0600

    76.05

    -0.08%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    23.44

    -0.3%

  • VOD

    -0.1350

    12.335

    -1.09%

  • JRI

    -0.0650

    13.73

    -0.47%

  • CMSD

    0.0750

    23.395

    +0.32%

  • BP

    0.5500

    36.65

    +1.5%

  • BTI

    -0.0900

    58.57

    -0.15%

  • RBGPF

    -0.3200

    76

    -0.42%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.