The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.673028
AFN 70.514885
ALL 85.866306
AMD 383.76049
ANG 1.789623
AOA 916.000191
ARS 1182.249591
AUD 1.529333
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70406
BAM 1.688822
BBD 2.018142
BDT 122.249135
BGN 1.68887
BHD 0.377196
BIF 2942
BMD 1
BND 1.27971
BOB 6.921831
BRL 5.506225
BSD 0.999486
BTN 85.958163
BWP 13.345422
BYN 3.271062
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007728
CAD 1.35586
CDF 2877.000286
CHF 0.812235
CLF 0.024416
CLP 936.95964
CNY 7.181595
CNH 7.181725
COP 4113.87
CRC 503.844676
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.875
CZK 21.431009
DJF 177.720157
DKK 6.44187
DOP 59.360893
DZD 129.793007
EGP 50.255016
ERN 15
ETB 134.398376
EUR 0.86373
FJD 2.238696
FKP 0.736284
GBP 0.735545
GEL 2.740238
GGP 0.736284
GHS 10.303098
GIP 0.736284
GMD 70.493572
GNF 8654.999632
GTQ 7.681581
GYD 209.114263
HKD 7.849825
HNL 26.106691
HRK 6.507497
HTG 130.801014
HUF 347.486987
IDR 16279.05
ILS 3.498955
IMP 0.736284
INR 85.99555
IQD 1310
IRR 42100.000278
ISK 124.449898
JEP 0.736284
JMD 159.534737
JOD 0.708971
JPY 144.396497
KES 129.499647
KGS 87.449711
KHR 4025.000116
KMF 426.49891
KPW 900
KRW 1358.344971
KWD 0.30596
KYD 0.832934
KZT 512.565895
LAK 21665.000453
LBP 89600.000143
LKR 300.951131
LRD 199.601923
LSL 17.939754
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.604891
LYD 5.445049
MAD 9.119498
MDL 17.092157
MGA 4455.00004
MKD 53.146147
MMK 2099.907788
MNT 3581.247911
MOP 8.081774
MRU 39.620401
MUR 45.379478
MVR 15.404966
MWK 1736.000108
MXN 18.91433
MYR 4.246007
MZN 63.950343
NAD 17.939576
NGN 1541.909956
NIO 36.295699
NOK 9.89988
NPR 137.533407
NZD 1.646985
OMR 0.384503
PAB 0.999503
PEN 3.618529
PGK 4.138002
PHP 56.386499
PKR 282.949801
PLN 3.69105
PYG 7973.439139
QAR 3.640602
RON 4.3379
RSD 101.254962
RUB 78.626024
RWF 1425
SAR 3.751863
SBD 8.347391
SCR 14.217342
SDG 600.507518
SEK 9.46597
SGD 1.27964
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.04976
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.512179
SRD 38.740954
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745774
SYP 13001.9038
SZL 17.940603
THB 32.423034
TJS 10.125468
TMT 3.5
TND 2.923969
TOP 2.342103
TRY 39.362445
TTD 6.785398
TWD 29.432989
TZS 2579.43203
UAH 41.557366
UGX 3603.362447
UYU 40.870605
UZS 12787.50116
VES 102.167041
VND 26061.5
VUV 119.102474
WST 2.619188
XAF 566.420137
XAG 0.027522
XAU 0.000295
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.70726
XOF 567.496125
XPF 103.924995
YER 243.349761
ZAR 17.804655
ZMK 9001.2023
ZMW 24.238499
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.