The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.673003
AFN 71.503924
ALL 86.949737
AMD 389.940112
ANG 1.80229
AOA 916.000051
ARS 1168.499993
AUD 1.563147
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.702996
BAM 1.720875
BBD 2.018575
BDT 121.46782
BGN 1.722899
BHD 0.376912
BIF 2935
BMD 1
BND 1.306209
BOB 6.908081
BRL 5.6668
BSD 0.99974
BTN 84.489457
BWP 13.685938
BYN 3.271726
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008192
CAD 1.380445
CDF 2877.999888
CHF 0.822302
CLF 0.024793
CLP 951.529973
CNY 7.269497
CNH 7.271815
COP 4212.53
CRC 504.973625
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.150091
CZK 21.94201
DJF 178.02982
DKK 6.56473
DOP 58.849743
DZD 132.596024
EGP 50.830903
ERN 15
ETB 131.850371
EUR 0.879501
FJD 2.26045
FKP 0.7464
GBP 0.748975
GEL 2.744996
GGP 0.7464
GHS 15.300322
GIP 0.7464
GMD 71.498917
GNF 8656.000122
GTQ 7.69911
GYD 209.794148
HKD 7.75535
HNL 25.824994
HRK 6.631406
HTG 130.612101
HUF 355.694985
IDR 16598.7
ILS 3.63992
IMP 0.7464
INR 84.60015
IQD 1310
IRR 42100.000373
ISK 128.160182
JEP 0.7464
JMD 158.264519
JOD 0.709203
JPY 142.636498
KES 129.502553
KGS 87.4498
KHR 4003.000323
KMF 432.24981
KPW 899.962286
KRW 1424.65498
KWD 0.30643
KYD 0.833176
KZT 513.046807
LAK 21620.000144
LBP 89549.999916
LKR 299.271004
LRD 199.52496
LSL 18.560234
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.454976
MAD 9.26225
MDL 17.160656
MGA 4510.00004
MKD 54.170518
MMK 2099.391763
MNT 3573.279231
MOP 7.987805
MRU 39.724972
MUR 45.159909
MVR 15.400824
MWK 1736.000089
MXN 19.57593
MYR 4.315003
MZN 64.010267
NAD 18.560175
NGN 1603.389662
NIO 36.703383
NOK 10.37113
NPR 135.187646
NZD 1.68544
OMR 0.384988
PAB 0.99974
PEN 3.6665
PGK 4.030501
PHP 55.836504
PKR 281.050137
PLN 3.764852
PYG 8007.144837
QAR 3.641498
RON 4.379298
RSD 103.23506
RUB 82.008666
RWF 1417
SAR 3.750957
SBD 8.361298
SCR 14.226332
SDG 600.507668
SEK 9.64557
SGD 1.305965
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.749986
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.499154
SRD 36.850247
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.747487
SYP 13001.4097
SZL 18.560092
THB 33.349499
TJS 10.537222
TMT 3.51
TND 2.973997
TOP 2.342101
TRY 38.4697
TTD 6.771697
TWD 32.037043
TZS 2689.999767
UAH 41.472624
UGX 3662.201104
UYU 42.065716
UZS 12945.000145
VES 86.54811
VND 26005
VUV 120.409409
WST 2.768399
XAF 577.175439
XAG 0.030621
XAU 0.000302
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.71673
XOF 574.999926
XPF 105.249972
YER 245.050136
ZAR 18.59776
ZMK 9001.197816
ZMW 27.817984
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -0.4500

    63

    -0.71%

  • RYCEF

    -0.3500

    9.9

    -3.54%

  • CMSC

    -0.0530

    22.187

    -0.24%

  • VOD

    0.1550

    9.735

    +1.59%

  • SCS

    -0.0300

    9.98

    -0.3%

  • GSK

    0.5850

    39.555

    +1.48%

  • NGG

    0.0100

    73.05

    +0.01%

  • RIO

    -1.6200

    59.26

    -2.73%

  • RELX

    0.7900

    54.58

    +1.45%

  • BTI

    0.7950

    43.655

    +1.82%

  • BCC

    -2.2550

    92.245

    -2.44%

  • CMSD

    -0.0850

    22.265

    -0.38%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    12.92

    -0.08%

  • BCE

    0.2000

    22.12

    +0.9%

  • BP

    -0.7350

    27.335

    -2.69%

  • AZN

    0.1600

    71.87

    +0.22%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.