The China Mail - Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

USD -
AED 3.67232
AFN 69.582255
ALL 84.918051
AMD 381.989449
ANG 1.789623
AOA 916.00015
ARS 1182.2858
AUD 1.538746
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.701725
BAM 1.695631
BBD 2.013828
BDT 121.888099
BGN 1.69545
BHD 0.377101
BIF 2969.77342
BMD 1
BND 1.281021
BOB 6.892456
BRL 5.546602
BSD 0.997429
BTN 85.827608
BWP 13.406562
BYN 3.264022
BYR 19600
BZD 2.003511
CAD 1.358395
CDF 2877.000247
CHF 0.811405
CLF 0.024433
CLP 937.593041
CNY 7.181597
CNH 7.184425
COP 4133.49
CRC 502.750432
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.597064
CZK 21.462983
DJF 177.611132
DKK 6.45438
DOP 58.90997
DZD 130.113113
EGP 50.609904
ERN 15
ETB 134.56173
EUR 0.86534
FJD 2.24575
FKP 0.736284
GBP 0.73676
GEL 2.739779
GGP 0.736284
GHS 10.273661
GIP 0.736284
GMD 70.49708
GNF 8642.729885
GTQ 7.664931
GYD 208.681027
HKD 7.84968
HNL 26.032225
HRK 6.518029
HTG 130.80701
HUF 348.181496
IDR 16295.1
ILS 3.55795
IMP 0.736284
INR 86.075902
IQD 1306.607597
IRR 42099.999706
ISK 124.579968
JEP 0.736284
JMD 159.696905
JOD 0.70899
JPY 144.043002
KES 128.867253
KGS 87.450149
KHR 3999.323765
KMF 426.533153
KPW 900
KRW 1361.069844
KWD 0.30593
KYD 0.831155
KZT 511.588995
LAK 21520.375564
LBP 89366.224962
LKR 298.647987
LRD 199.484167
LSL 17.949916
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.44962
MAD 9.119803
MDL 17.080413
MGA 4503.821096
MKD 53.236364
MMK 2099.907788
MNT 3581.247911
MOP 8.063844
MRU 39.597557
MUR 45.490459
MVR 15.405002
MWK 1729.48464
MXN 18.92442
MYR 4.244008
MZN 63.950363
NAD 17.949916
NGN 1545.490059
NIO 36.70711
NOK 9.900605
NPR 137.326554
NZD 1.659076
OMR 0.384498
PAB 0.997455
PEN 3.600203
PGK 4.166612
PHP 56.502971
PKR 282.765147
PLN 3.693896
PYG 7958.560003
QAR 3.638523
RON 4.348202
RSD 101.402976
RUB 79.502451
RWF 1440.294076
SAR 3.754305
SBD 8.347391
SCR 14.228557
SDG 600.501551
SEK 9.49724
SGD 1.281215
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.050262
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 570.036456
SRD 37.528023
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.727692
SYP 13001.9038
SZL 17.938126
THB 32.458501
TJS 10.073996
TMT 3.5
TND 2.951358
TOP 2.342101
TRY 39.428965
TTD 6.763968
TWD 29.494965
TZS 2586.681991
UAH 41.37256
UGX 3594.480833
UYU 41.007946
UZS 12673.394368
VES 102.16696
VND 26091.5
VUV 119.102474
WST 2.619188
XAF 568.693783
XAG 0.027512
XAU 0.000293
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.70726
XOF 568.693783
XPF 103.395062
YER 243.350268
ZAR 17.90752
ZMK 9001.199446
ZMW 24.112356
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?




As Donald Trump’s second term as U.S. President intensifies global tensions, a volatile mix of international defiance and regional military posturing is emerging, with Poland at the centre of a brewing storm. Amidst protests against Trump’s policies, speculation about nuclear escalation and Poland’s strategic moves against Russia have raised alarms, encapsulated in the provocative phrase circulating among activists and commentators: "We are ready for war." Yet, the reality behind these developments remains grounded in diplomatic friction and military preparedness rather than imminent conflict.

Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025 marked a return to his "America First" stance, including a pledge to reassess U.S. commitments to NATO, announced in a speech in Texas on 25 January. This has sparked outrage across Europe, with protests erupting in cities like Paris and Berlin. On 28 January, French activist Élise Moreau told a crowd of 12,000 outside the U.S. Embassy in Paris—according to police estimates—that "we are ready for war" against Trump’s "disruptive unilateralism." Similar sentiments have echoed in Warsaw, where Polish citizens and officials fear that a weakened NATO could embolden Russia’s ambitions in Eastern Europe.

Poland’s response has been swift and assertive. On 5 March, the Polish Ministry of Defence confirmed the deployment of an additional 10,000 troops to its eastern border with Belarus and Ukraine, citing "heightened Russian military activity" in the region. This followed reports from the Ukrainian General Staff on 2 March that Russia had amassed 50,000 troops near its western frontier, though Moscow denied any aggressive intent. Poland’s Foreign Minister, Anna Kowalska, stated on 7 March that "Warsaw will not wait for threats to materialise," framing the troop surge as a defensive "gambit" to deter Russian advances.

The spectre of nuclear weapons has further inflamed rhetoric. On 10 March, a senior Polish MP from the ruling Law and Justice Party, Janusz Kowalski, suggested in a televised debate that Poland might seek NATO nuclear sharing agreements "if the U.S. wavers." This echoed Trump’s own comments on 8 March in Florida, where he hinted at reconsidering America’s nuclear umbrella over Europe, stating, "Allies need to pay their share, or they’re on their own." No evidence suggests nuclear weapons are currently "on the way" to Poland, but the remarks have fuelled speculation and alarm, amplified by posts on X claiming "nukes" are imminent.

Across the Atlantic, Trump has dismissed the backlash. At a rally in Michigan on 15 March, attended by an estimated 18,000 supporters according to local authorities, he called European critics "freeloaders" and reiterated his intent to renegotiate defence pacts. The White House followed this with a statement on 16 March, asserting that "no changes to NATO’s nuclear posture are under consideration," attempting to quell fears of escalation.

In Europe, reactions vary. Germany’s Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" on 12 March about Poland’s troop movements, urging restraint to avoid provoking Moscow. Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced on 17 March that the alliance would hold emergency talks in Brussels next week to address "cohesion and deterrence" amid Trump’s pressures. Analysts note that Poland’s actions align with its long-standing policy of bolstering its military—its defence budget reached 4% of GDP in 2024, per World Bank data—reflecting fears rooted in Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The "ready for war" rhetoric, while widespread, remains symbolic. Dr. Katarzyna Zielinska, a security expert at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, told this publication, "Poland’s gambit is about deterrence, not aggression. Talk of war—or nukes—is an expression of anxiety, not a plan." Still, the situation is precarious. The International Institute for Strategic Studies reported on 14 March that Russian air patrols near Polish airspace increased by 20% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, heightening regional tensions.

For now, the international rebellion against Trump and Poland’s military stance are distinct but intertwined threads in a broader tapestry of uncertainty. Protests continue—organisers in London are planning a rally for 25 March—while Poland’s border fortifications proceed. Whether these developments signal a genuine slide towards conflict or a recalibration of global alliances remains unclear. What is certain is that Trump’s shadow, and Russia’s looming presence, have set the stage for a critical test of resolve in the months ahead.