The China Mail - Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

USD -
AED 3.67241
AFN 69.726577
ALL 84.580014
AMD 382.790406
ANG 1.789623
AOA 916.000058
ARS 1182.2388
AUD 1.53198
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.704183
BAM 1.688822
BBD 2.018142
BDT 122.249135
BGN 1.688881
BHD 0.377194
BIF 2976.232109
BMD 1
BND 1.27971
BOB 6.921831
BRL 5.533797
BSD 0.999486
BTN 85.958163
BWP 13.345422
BYN 3.271062
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007728
CAD 1.356475
CDF 2876.999499
CHF 0.811345
CLF 0.024423
CLP 937.230151
CNY 7.181597
CNH 7.181825
COP 4122.55
CRC 503.844676
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.216507
CZK 21.40675
DJF 177.993653
DKK 6.44289
DOP 58.915719
DZD 130.011972
EGP 50.258201
ERN 15
ETB 136.563694
EUR 0.86386
FJD 2.24175
FKP 0.736284
GBP 0.736325
GEL 2.739802
GGP 0.736284
GHS 10.295534
GIP 0.736284
GMD 70.499815
GNF 8660.285222
GTQ 7.681581
GYD 209.114263
HKD 7.84986
HNL 26.087032
HRK 6.510201
HTG 130.801014
HUF 346.887985
IDR 16287
ILS 3.52115
IMP 0.736284
INR 86.04255
IQD 1309.391717
IRR 42099.999662
ISK 124.220056
JEP 0.736284
JMD 159.534737
JOD 0.709013
JPY 144.182495
KES 129.219705
KGS 87.450028
KHR 4001.467953
KMF 426.504011
KPW 900
KRW 1359.314973
KWD 0.305903
KYD 0.832934
KZT 512.565895
LAK 21561.643244
LBP 89558.448287
LKR 300.951131
LRD 199.909332
LSL 17.782201
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.425523
MAD 9.103626
MDL 17.092157
MGA 4438.399931
MKD 53.165749
MMK 2099.907788
MNT 3581.247911
MOP 8.081774
MRU 39.572225
MUR 45.250025
MVR 15.405016
MWK 1733.221078
MXN 18.909503
MYR 4.240496
MZN 63.949852
NAD 17.782201
NGN 1546.410082
NIO 36.784547
NOK 9.906139
NPR 137.533407
NZD 1.65127
OMR 0.384496
PAB 0.999503
PEN 3.618529
PGK 4.113794
PHP 56.455503
PKR 282.963746
PLN 3.68385
PYG 7973.439139
QAR 3.655212
RON 4.340797
RSD 101.240267
RUB 78.752008
RWF 1443.343479
SAR 3.752192
SBD 8.347391
SCR 14.449086
SDG 600.500523
SEK 9.46954
SGD 1.280035
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.049769
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.206528
SRD 37.527997
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745774
SYP 13001.9038
SZL 17.774017
THB 32.477501
TJS 10.125468
TMT 3.5
TND 2.94987
TOP 2.342099
TRY 39.39642
TTD 6.785398
TWD 29.505394
TZS 2579.431949
UAH 41.557366
UGX 3603.362447
UYU 40.870605
UZS 12753.70328
VES 102.166996
VND 26061.5
VUV 119.102474
WST 2.619188
XAF 566.420137
XAG 0.027505
XAU 0.000293
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.70726
XOF 566.43481
XPF 102.980351
YER 243.350351
ZAR 17.780202
ZMK 9001.210419
ZMW 24.238499
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%


Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?




As Donald Trump’s second term as U.S. President intensifies global tensions, a volatile mix of international defiance and regional military posturing is emerging, with Poland at the centre of a brewing storm. Amidst protests against Trump’s policies, speculation about nuclear escalation and Poland’s strategic moves against Russia have raised alarms, encapsulated in the provocative phrase circulating among activists and commentators: "We are ready for war." Yet, the reality behind these developments remains grounded in diplomatic friction and military preparedness rather than imminent conflict.

Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025 marked a return to his "America First" stance, including a pledge to reassess U.S. commitments to NATO, announced in a speech in Texas on 25 January. This has sparked outrage across Europe, with protests erupting in cities like Paris and Berlin. On 28 January, French activist Élise Moreau told a crowd of 12,000 outside the U.S. Embassy in Paris—according to police estimates—that "we are ready for war" against Trump’s "disruptive unilateralism." Similar sentiments have echoed in Warsaw, where Polish citizens and officials fear that a weakened NATO could embolden Russia’s ambitions in Eastern Europe.

Poland’s response has been swift and assertive. On 5 March, the Polish Ministry of Defence confirmed the deployment of an additional 10,000 troops to its eastern border with Belarus and Ukraine, citing "heightened Russian military activity" in the region. This followed reports from the Ukrainian General Staff on 2 March that Russia had amassed 50,000 troops near its western frontier, though Moscow denied any aggressive intent. Poland’s Foreign Minister, Anna Kowalska, stated on 7 March that "Warsaw will not wait for threats to materialise," framing the troop surge as a defensive "gambit" to deter Russian advances.

The spectre of nuclear weapons has further inflamed rhetoric. On 10 March, a senior Polish MP from the ruling Law and Justice Party, Janusz Kowalski, suggested in a televised debate that Poland might seek NATO nuclear sharing agreements "if the U.S. wavers." This echoed Trump’s own comments on 8 March in Florida, where he hinted at reconsidering America’s nuclear umbrella over Europe, stating, "Allies need to pay their share, or they’re on their own." No evidence suggests nuclear weapons are currently "on the way" to Poland, but the remarks have fuelled speculation and alarm, amplified by posts on X claiming "nukes" are imminent.

Across the Atlantic, Trump has dismissed the backlash. At a rally in Michigan on 15 March, attended by an estimated 18,000 supporters according to local authorities, he called European critics "freeloaders" and reiterated his intent to renegotiate defence pacts. The White House followed this with a statement on 16 March, asserting that "no changes to NATO’s nuclear posture are under consideration," attempting to quell fears of escalation.

In Europe, reactions vary. Germany’s Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" on 12 March about Poland’s troop movements, urging restraint to avoid provoking Moscow. Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced on 17 March that the alliance would hold emergency talks in Brussels next week to address "cohesion and deterrence" amid Trump’s pressures. Analysts note that Poland’s actions align with its long-standing policy of bolstering its military—its defence budget reached 4% of GDP in 2024, per World Bank data—reflecting fears rooted in Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The "ready for war" rhetoric, while widespread, remains symbolic. Dr. Katarzyna Zielinska, a security expert at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, told this publication, "Poland’s gambit is about deterrence, not aggression. Talk of war—or nukes—is an expression of anxiety, not a plan." Still, the situation is precarious. The International Institute for Strategic Studies reported on 14 March that Russian air patrols near Polish airspace increased by 20% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, heightening regional tensions.

For now, the international rebellion against Trump and Poland’s military stance are distinct but intertwined threads in a broader tapestry of uncertainty. Protests continue—organisers in London are planning a rally for 25 March—while Poland’s border fortifications proceed. Whether these developments signal a genuine slide towards conflict or a recalibration of global alliances remains unclear. What is certain is that Trump’s shadow, and Russia’s looming presence, have set the stage for a critical test of resolve in the months ahead.