The China Mail - Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 66.737984
ALL 83.174731
AMD 382.481965
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.000614
ARS 1429.731598
AUD 1.514922
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.702368
BAM 1.680652
BBD 2.013396
BDT 121.748022
BGN 1.679195
BHD 0.376997
BIF 2945.252856
BMD 1
BND 1.295062
BOB 6.908049
BRL 5.335301
BSD 0.999643
BTN 88.664321
BWP 13.308816
BYN 3.397906
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010474
CAD 1.39445
CDF 2409.999865
CHF 0.801104
CLF 0.024242
CLP 951.010147
CNY 7.119503
CNH 7.13451
COP 3889.25
CRC 503.091154
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.752581
CZK 20.945601
DJF 178.009392
DKK 6.418235
DOP 62.587805
DZD 130.329513
EGP 47.559302
ERN 15
ETB 145.326837
EUR 0.85959
FJD 2.25895
FKP 0.743972
GBP 0.746285
GEL 2.720175
GGP 0.743972
GHS 12.346666
GIP 0.743972
GMD 71.999662
GNF 8669.837301
GTQ 7.659951
GYD 209.157741
HKD 7.780375
HNL 26.234636
HRK 6.47302
HTG 130.8037
HUF 336.320293
IDR 16548.05
ILS 3.257195
IMP 0.743972
INR 88.77665
IQD 1309.639916
IRR 42074.999635
ISK 121.540306
JEP 0.743972
JMD 160.001031
JOD 0.70897
JPY 152.7875
KES 129.202513
KGS 87.449836
KHR 4013.558973
KMF 424.000321
KPW 900.00029
KRW 1419.530026
KWD 0.30672
KYD 0.833076
KZT 540.094177
LAK 21677.843987
LBP 89517.917521
LKR 302.493137
LRD 182.45017
LSL 17.161748
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.436431
MAD 9.11022
MDL 16.968478
MGA 4468.064082
MKD 52.923117
MMK 2099.241766
MNT 3597.321295
MOP 8.014058
MRU 39.931088
MUR 45.420265
MVR 15.298106
MWK 1733.358538
MXN 18.332704
MYR 4.214503
MZN 63.850376
NAD 17.162559
NGN 1471.149966
NIO 36.784513
NOK 9.977915
NPR 141.851943
NZD 1.725645
OMR 0.384497
PAB 0.999729
PEN 3.441994
PGK 4.196579
PHP 57.977498
PKR 283.146033
PLN 3.65813
PYG 6980.550865
QAR 3.644793
RON 4.377701
RSD 100.72698
RUB 81.435988
RWF 1450.488265
SAR 3.750789
SBD 8.271757
SCR 14.849626
SDG 601.496166
SEK 9.43055
SGD 1.294775
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.214972
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.315641
SRD 38.152503
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.051637
SVC 8.747508
SYP 13001.812646
SZL 17.15307
THB 32.580208
TJS 9.29738
TMT 3.51
TND 2.935684
TOP 2.342098
TRY 41.717101
TTD 6.788341
TWD 30.502299
TZS 2459.077992
UAH 41.452471
UGX 3433.830448
UYU 39.906678
UZS 12020.125202
VES 189.012825
VND 26350
VUV 121.219369
WST 2.770863
XAF 563.628943
XAG 0.020324
XAU 0.000248
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80166
XDR 0.700971
XOF 563.626521
XPF 102.482137
YER 239.000076
ZAR 17.153602
ZMK 9001.234506
ZMW 23.711876
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.0300

    23.71

    -0.13%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    24.33

    -0.29%

  • RBGPF

    -1.4100

    75.73

    -1.86%

  • SCS

    -0.0700

    16.79

    -0.42%

  • NGG

    -0.2700

    73.61

    -0.37%

  • RIO

    1.4500

    67.7

    +2.14%

  • BCC

    1.9000

    76.42

    +2.49%

  • GSK

    -0.1500

    43.35

    -0.35%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    23.23

    -0.26%

  • RYCEF

    0.0200

    15.41

    +0.13%

  • AZN

    -0.4900

    85.38

    -0.57%

  • BTI

    -0.3800

    51.6

    -0.74%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    14.12

    +0.35%

  • RELX

    0.4000

    45.84

    +0.87%

  • VOD

    0.0000

    11.27

    0%

  • BP

    -0.4500

    34.52

    -1.3%


Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?




As Donald Trump’s second term as U.S. President intensifies global tensions, a volatile mix of international defiance and regional military posturing is emerging, with Poland at the centre of a brewing storm. Amidst protests against Trump’s policies, speculation about nuclear escalation and Poland’s strategic moves against Russia have raised alarms, encapsulated in the provocative phrase circulating among activists and commentators: "We are ready for war." Yet, the reality behind these developments remains grounded in diplomatic friction and military preparedness rather than imminent conflict.

Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025 marked a return to his "America First" stance, including a pledge to reassess U.S. commitments to NATO, announced in a speech in Texas on 25 January. This has sparked outrage across Europe, with protests erupting in cities like Paris and Berlin. On 28 January, French activist Élise Moreau told a crowd of 12,000 outside the U.S. Embassy in Paris—according to police estimates—that "we are ready for war" against Trump’s "disruptive unilateralism." Similar sentiments have echoed in Warsaw, where Polish citizens and officials fear that a weakened NATO could embolden Russia’s ambitions in Eastern Europe.

Poland’s response has been swift and assertive. On 5 March, the Polish Ministry of Defence confirmed the deployment of an additional 10,000 troops to its eastern border with Belarus and Ukraine, citing "heightened Russian military activity" in the region. This followed reports from the Ukrainian General Staff on 2 March that Russia had amassed 50,000 troops near its western frontier, though Moscow denied any aggressive intent. Poland’s Foreign Minister, Anna Kowalska, stated on 7 March that "Warsaw will not wait for threats to materialise," framing the troop surge as a defensive "gambit" to deter Russian advances.

The spectre of nuclear weapons has further inflamed rhetoric. On 10 March, a senior Polish MP from the ruling Law and Justice Party, Janusz Kowalski, suggested in a televised debate that Poland might seek NATO nuclear sharing agreements "if the U.S. wavers." This echoed Trump’s own comments on 8 March in Florida, where he hinted at reconsidering America’s nuclear umbrella over Europe, stating, "Allies need to pay their share, or they’re on their own." No evidence suggests nuclear weapons are currently "on the way" to Poland, but the remarks have fuelled speculation and alarm, amplified by posts on X claiming "nukes" are imminent.

Across the Atlantic, Trump has dismissed the backlash. At a rally in Michigan on 15 March, attended by an estimated 18,000 supporters according to local authorities, he called European critics "freeloaders" and reiterated his intent to renegotiate defence pacts. The White House followed this with a statement on 16 March, asserting that "no changes to NATO’s nuclear posture are under consideration," attempting to quell fears of escalation.

In Europe, reactions vary. Germany’s Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" on 12 March about Poland’s troop movements, urging restraint to avoid provoking Moscow. Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced on 17 March that the alliance would hold emergency talks in Brussels next week to address "cohesion and deterrence" amid Trump’s pressures. Analysts note that Poland’s actions align with its long-standing policy of bolstering its military—its defence budget reached 4% of GDP in 2024, per World Bank data—reflecting fears rooted in Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The "ready for war" rhetoric, while widespread, remains symbolic. Dr. Katarzyna Zielinska, a security expert at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, told this publication, "Poland’s gambit is about deterrence, not aggression. Talk of war—or nukes—is an expression of anxiety, not a plan." Still, the situation is precarious. The International Institute for Strategic Studies reported on 14 March that Russian air patrols near Polish airspace increased by 20% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, heightening regional tensions.

For now, the international rebellion against Trump and Poland’s military stance are distinct but intertwined threads in a broader tapestry of uncertainty. Protests continue—organisers in London are planning a rally for 25 March—while Poland’s border fortifications proceed. Whether these developments signal a genuine slide towards conflict or a recalibration of global alliances remains unclear. What is certain is that Trump’s shadow, and Russia’s looming presence, have set the stage for a critical test of resolve in the months ahead.