The China Mail - Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

USD -
AED 3.67298
AFN 70.823013
ALL 86.775569
AMD 388.915041
ANG 1.80229
AOA 916.00029
ARS 1165.000022
AUD 1.56485
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.725034
BAM 1.720875
BBD 2.018575
BDT 121.46782
BGN 1.719448
BHD 0.376902
BIF 2973.52826
BMD 1
BND 1.306209
BOB 6.908081
BRL 5.613981
BSD 0.99974
BTN 84.489457
BWP 13.685938
BYN 3.271726
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008192
CAD 1.38313
CDF 2878.000221
CHF 0.82535
CLF 0.024716
CLP 948.450004
CNY 7.269496
CNH 7.26963
COP 4197
CRC 504.973625
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.016862
CZK 21.912971
DJF 178.02982
DKK 6.56345
DOP 58.838798
DZD 132.52396
EGP 50.785603
ERN 15
ETB 134.165658
EUR 0.879195
FJD 2.261003
FKP 0.7464
GBP 0.748875
GEL 2.744945
GGP 0.7464
GHS 14.246433
GIP 0.7464
GMD 71.500564
GNF 8658.621888
GTQ 7.69911
GYD 209.794148
HKD 7.75648
HNL 25.944257
HRK 6.623697
HTG 130.612101
HUF 355.279662
IDR 16618.75
ILS 3.62579
IMP 0.7464
INR 84.542499
IQD 1309.640606
IRR 42100.000025
ISK 128.279933
JEP 0.7464
JMD 158.264519
JOD 0.709299
JPY 143.034015
KES 129.430095
KGS 87.44998
KHR 4001.777395
KMF 432.250385
KPW 899.962286
KRW 1422.97993
KWD 0.30643
KYD 0.833176
KZT 513.046807
LAK 21614.701341
LBP 89576.724931
LKR 299.271004
LRD 199.948086
LSL 18.615568
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.457033
MAD 9.266636
MDL 17.160656
MGA 4439.086842
MKD 54.126919
MMK 2099.391763
MNT 3573.279231
MOP 7.987805
MRU 39.562664
MUR 45.160016
MVR 15.39428
MWK 1733.575599
MXN 19.522097
MYR 4.314974
MZN 64.009766
NAD 18.615896
NGN 1602.520288
NIO 36.788547
NOK 10.383565
NPR 135.187646
NZD 1.689835
OMR 0.385001
PAB 0.99974
PEN 3.665568
PGK 4.08192
PHP 55.868503
PKR 280.902072
PLN 3.759073
PYG 8007.144837
QAR 3.643899
RON 4.376897
RSD 103.124079
RUB 81.242148
RWF 1436.169979
SAR 3.750752
SBD 8.361298
SCR 14.215028
SDG 600.497601
SEK 9.64629
SGD 1.30636
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.750038
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.317956
SRD 36.850118
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.747487
SYP 13001.4097
SZL 18.59929
THB 33.419936
TJS 10.537222
TMT 3.51
TND 2.969282
TOP 2.342098
TRY 38.474995
TTD 6.771697
TWD 32.034304
TZS 2695.000166
UAH 41.472624
UGX 3662.201104
UYU 42.065716
UZS 12930.219053
VES 86.54811
VND 26005
VUV 120.409409
WST 2.768399
XAF 577.175439
XAG 0.031024
XAU 0.000305
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.71673
XOF 577.165282
XPF 104.934823
YER 245.049905
ZAR 18.56175
ZMK 9001.20839
ZMW 27.817984
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    -0.2300

    9.78

    -2.35%

  • RBGPF

    -0.4500

    63

    -0.71%

  • CMSC

    -0.0800

    22.24

    -0.36%

  • RELX

    -0.0400

    53.75

    -0.07%

  • CMSD

    -0.1500

    22.2

    -0.68%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1300

    10.12

    -1.28%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    72.79

    -0.34%

  • VOD

    0.0760

    9.656

    +0.79%

  • RIO

    -2.3000

    58.58

    -3.93%

  • BCC

    -2.5500

    91.95

    -2.77%

  • BCE

    -0.1650

    21.755

    -0.76%

  • AZN

    0.1500

    71.86

    +0.21%

  • GSK

    1.0150

    39.985

    +2.54%

  • BTI

    0.7850

    43.645

    +1.8%

  • BP

    -0.2900

    27.78

    -1.04%

  • JRI

    -0.2490

    12.681

    -1.96%


Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?




As Donald Trump’s second term as U.S. President intensifies global tensions, a volatile mix of international defiance and regional military posturing is emerging, with Poland at the centre of a brewing storm. Amidst protests against Trump’s policies, speculation about nuclear escalation and Poland’s strategic moves against Russia have raised alarms, encapsulated in the provocative phrase circulating among activists and commentators: "We are ready for war." Yet, the reality behind these developments remains grounded in diplomatic friction and military preparedness rather than imminent conflict.

Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025 marked a return to his "America First" stance, including a pledge to reassess U.S. commitments to NATO, announced in a speech in Texas on 25 January. This has sparked outrage across Europe, with protests erupting in cities like Paris and Berlin. On 28 January, French activist Élise Moreau told a crowd of 12,000 outside the U.S. Embassy in Paris—according to police estimates—that "we are ready for war" against Trump’s "disruptive unilateralism." Similar sentiments have echoed in Warsaw, where Polish citizens and officials fear that a weakened NATO could embolden Russia’s ambitions in Eastern Europe.

Poland’s response has been swift and assertive. On 5 March, the Polish Ministry of Defence confirmed the deployment of an additional 10,000 troops to its eastern border with Belarus and Ukraine, citing "heightened Russian military activity" in the region. This followed reports from the Ukrainian General Staff on 2 March that Russia had amassed 50,000 troops near its western frontier, though Moscow denied any aggressive intent. Poland’s Foreign Minister, Anna Kowalska, stated on 7 March that "Warsaw will not wait for threats to materialise," framing the troop surge as a defensive "gambit" to deter Russian advances.

The spectre of nuclear weapons has further inflamed rhetoric. On 10 March, a senior Polish MP from the ruling Law and Justice Party, Janusz Kowalski, suggested in a televised debate that Poland might seek NATO nuclear sharing agreements "if the U.S. wavers." This echoed Trump’s own comments on 8 March in Florida, where he hinted at reconsidering America’s nuclear umbrella over Europe, stating, "Allies need to pay their share, or they’re on their own." No evidence suggests nuclear weapons are currently "on the way" to Poland, but the remarks have fuelled speculation and alarm, amplified by posts on X claiming "nukes" are imminent.

Across the Atlantic, Trump has dismissed the backlash. At a rally in Michigan on 15 March, attended by an estimated 18,000 supporters according to local authorities, he called European critics "freeloaders" and reiterated his intent to renegotiate defence pacts. The White House followed this with a statement on 16 March, asserting that "no changes to NATO’s nuclear posture are under consideration," attempting to quell fears of escalation.

In Europe, reactions vary. Germany’s Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" on 12 March about Poland’s troop movements, urging restraint to avoid provoking Moscow. Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced on 17 March that the alliance would hold emergency talks in Brussels next week to address "cohesion and deterrence" amid Trump’s pressures. Analysts note that Poland’s actions align with its long-standing policy of bolstering its military—its defence budget reached 4% of GDP in 2024, per World Bank data—reflecting fears rooted in Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The "ready for war" rhetoric, while widespread, remains symbolic. Dr. Katarzyna Zielinska, a security expert at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, told this publication, "Poland’s gambit is about deterrence, not aggression. Talk of war—or nukes—is an expression of anxiety, not a plan." Still, the situation is precarious. The International Institute for Strategic Studies reported on 14 March that Russian air patrols near Polish airspace increased by 20% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, heightening regional tensions.

For now, the international rebellion against Trump and Poland’s military stance are distinct but intertwined threads in a broader tapestry of uncertainty. Protests continue—organisers in London are planning a rally for 25 March—while Poland’s border fortifications proceed. Whether these developments signal a genuine slide towards conflict or a recalibration of global alliances remains unclear. What is certain is that Trump’s shadow, and Russia’s looming presence, have set the stage for a critical test of resolve in the months ahead.