The China Mail - Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

USD -
AED 3.673003
AFN 71.503924
ALL 86.949737
AMD 389.940112
ANG 1.80229
AOA 916.000051
ARS 1168.499993
AUD 1.563147
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.702996
BAM 1.720875
BBD 2.018575
BDT 121.46782
BGN 1.722899
BHD 0.376912
BIF 2935
BMD 1
BND 1.306209
BOB 6.908081
BRL 5.6668
BSD 0.99974
BTN 84.489457
BWP 13.685938
BYN 3.271726
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008192
CAD 1.380445
CDF 2877.999888
CHF 0.822302
CLF 0.024793
CLP 951.529973
CNY 7.269497
CNH 7.271815
COP 4212.53
CRC 504.973625
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.150091
CZK 21.94201
DJF 178.02982
DKK 6.56473
DOP 58.849743
DZD 132.596024
EGP 50.830903
ERN 15
ETB 131.850371
EUR 0.879501
FJD 2.26045
FKP 0.7464
GBP 0.748975
GEL 2.744996
GGP 0.7464
GHS 15.300322
GIP 0.7464
GMD 71.498917
GNF 8656.000122
GTQ 7.69911
GYD 209.794148
HKD 7.75535
HNL 25.824994
HRK 6.631406
HTG 130.612101
HUF 355.694985
IDR 16598.7
ILS 3.63992
IMP 0.7464
INR 84.60015
IQD 1310
IRR 42100.000373
ISK 128.160182
JEP 0.7464
JMD 158.264519
JOD 0.709203
JPY 142.636498
KES 129.502553
KGS 87.4498
KHR 4003.000323
KMF 432.24981
KPW 899.962286
KRW 1424.65498
KWD 0.30643
KYD 0.833176
KZT 513.046807
LAK 21620.000144
LBP 89549.999916
LKR 299.271004
LRD 199.52496
LSL 18.560234
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.454976
MAD 9.26225
MDL 17.160656
MGA 4510.00004
MKD 54.170518
MMK 2099.391763
MNT 3573.279231
MOP 7.987805
MRU 39.724972
MUR 45.159909
MVR 15.400824
MWK 1736.000089
MXN 19.57593
MYR 4.315003
MZN 64.010267
NAD 18.560175
NGN 1603.389662
NIO 36.703383
NOK 10.37113
NPR 135.187646
NZD 1.68544
OMR 0.384988
PAB 0.99974
PEN 3.6665
PGK 4.030501
PHP 55.836504
PKR 281.050137
PLN 3.764852
PYG 8007.144837
QAR 3.641498
RON 4.379298
RSD 103.23506
RUB 82.008666
RWF 1417
SAR 3.750957
SBD 8.361298
SCR 14.226332
SDG 600.507668
SEK 9.64557
SGD 1.305965
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.749986
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.499154
SRD 36.850247
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.747487
SYP 13001.4097
SZL 18.560092
THB 33.349499
TJS 10.537222
TMT 3.51
TND 2.973997
TOP 2.342101
TRY 38.4697
TTD 6.771697
TWD 32.037043
TZS 2689.999767
UAH 41.472624
UGX 3662.201104
UYU 42.065716
UZS 12945.000145
VES 86.54811
VND 26005
VUV 120.409409
WST 2.768399
XAF 577.175439
XAG 0.030621
XAU 0.000302
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.71673
XOF 574.999926
XPF 105.249972
YER 245.050136
ZAR 18.59776
ZMK 9001.197816
ZMW 27.817984
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -0.4500

    63

    -0.71%

  • RYCEF

    -0.3500

    9.9

    -3.54%

  • CMSC

    -0.0530

    22.187

    -0.24%

  • VOD

    0.1550

    9.735

    +1.59%

  • SCS

    -0.0300

    9.98

    -0.3%

  • GSK

    0.5850

    39.555

    +1.48%

  • NGG

    0.0100

    73.05

    +0.01%

  • RIO

    -1.6200

    59.26

    -2.73%

  • RELX

    0.7900

    54.58

    +1.45%

  • BTI

    0.7950

    43.655

    +1.82%

  • BCC

    -2.2550

    92.245

    -2.44%

  • CMSD

    -0.0850

    22.265

    -0.38%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    12.92

    -0.08%

  • BCE

    0.2000

    22.12

    +0.9%

  • BP

    -0.7350

    27.335

    -2.69%

  • AZN

    0.1600

    71.87

    +0.22%


Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?




As Donald Trump’s second term as U.S. President intensifies global tensions, a volatile mix of international defiance and regional military posturing is emerging, with Poland at the centre of a brewing storm. Amidst protests against Trump’s policies, speculation about nuclear escalation and Poland’s strategic moves against Russia have raised alarms, encapsulated in the provocative phrase circulating among activists and commentators: "We are ready for war." Yet, the reality behind these developments remains grounded in diplomatic friction and military preparedness rather than imminent conflict.

Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025 marked a return to his "America First" stance, including a pledge to reassess U.S. commitments to NATO, announced in a speech in Texas on 25 January. This has sparked outrage across Europe, with protests erupting in cities like Paris and Berlin. On 28 January, French activist Élise Moreau told a crowd of 12,000 outside the U.S. Embassy in Paris—according to police estimates—that "we are ready for war" against Trump’s "disruptive unilateralism." Similar sentiments have echoed in Warsaw, where Polish citizens and officials fear that a weakened NATO could embolden Russia’s ambitions in Eastern Europe.

Poland’s response has been swift and assertive. On 5 March, the Polish Ministry of Defence confirmed the deployment of an additional 10,000 troops to its eastern border with Belarus and Ukraine, citing "heightened Russian military activity" in the region. This followed reports from the Ukrainian General Staff on 2 March that Russia had amassed 50,000 troops near its western frontier, though Moscow denied any aggressive intent. Poland’s Foreign Minister, Anna Kowalska, stated on 7 March that "Warsaw will not wait for threats to materialise," framing the troop surge as a defensive "gambit" to deter Russian advances.

The spectre of nuclear weapons has further inflamed rhetoric. On 10 March, a senior Polish MP from the ruling Law and Justice Party, Janusz Kowalski, suggested in a televised debate that Poland might seek NATO nuclear sharing agreements "if the U.S. wavers." This echoed Trump’s own comments on 8 March in Florida, where he hinted at reconsidering America’s nuclear umbrella over Europe, stating, "Allies need to pay their share, or they’re on their own." No evidence suggests nuclear weapons are currently "on the way" to Poland, but the remarks have fuelled speculation and alarm, amplified by posts on X claiming "nukes" are imminent.

Across the Atlantic, Trump has dismissed the backlash. At a rally in Michigan on 15 March, attended by an estimated 18,000 supporters according to local authorities, he called European critics "freeloaders" and reiterated his intent to renegotiate defence pacts. The White House followed this with a statement on 16 March, asserting that "no changes to NATO’s nuclear posture are under consideration," attempting to quell fears of escalation.

In Europe, reactions vary. Germany’s Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" on 12 March about Poland’s troop movements, urging restraint to avoid provoking Moscow. Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced on 17 March that the alliance would hold emergency talks in Brussels next week to address "cohesion and deterrence" amid Trump’s pressures. Analysts note that Poland’s actions align with its long-standing policy of bolstering its military—its defence budget reached 4% of GDP in 2024, per World Bank data—reflecting fears rooted in Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The "ready for war" rhetoric, while widespread, remains symbolic. Dr. Katarzyna Zielinska, a security expert at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, told this publication, "Poland’s gambit is about deterrence, not aggression. Talk of war—or nukes—is an expression of anxiety, not a plan." Still, the situation is precarious. The International Institute for Strategic Studies reported on 14 March that Russian air patrols near Polish airspace increased by 20% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, heightening regional tensions.

For now, the international rebellion against Trump and Poland’s military stance are distinct but intertwined threads in a broader tapestry of uncertainty. Protests continue—organisers in London are planning a rally for 25 March—while Poland’s border fortifications proceed. Whether these developments signal a genuine slide towards conflict or a recalibration of global alliances remains unclear. What is certain is that Trump’s shadow, and Russia’s looming presence, have set the stage for a critical test of resolve in the months ahead.