The China Mail - Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 65.000368
ALL 81.503989
AMD 360.340403
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1544.046724
AUD 1.454757
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.75029
BBD 2.013844
BDT 124.537437
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.37735
BIF 3010
BMD 1
BND 1.281347
BOB 11.99429
BRL 5.504904
BSD 0.999897
BTN 93.858629
BWP 13.774679
BYN 2.994523
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011053
CAD 1.41135
CDF 2320.000362
CHF 0.820469
CLF 0.02484
CLP 977.630396
CNY 6.676504
CNH 6.67282
COP 3251.53
CRC 453.465426
CUC 1
CUP 23.998962
CVE 99.403894
CZK 21.83445
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.708504
DOP 60.750393
DZD 136.38704
EGP 53.769786
ERN 15
ETB 161.203874
EUR 0.896804
FJD 2.25525
FKP 0.741654
GBP 0.748671
GEL 2.59504
GGP 0.741654
GHS 11.68504
GIP 0.741654
GMD 74.503851
GNF 8857.503848
GTQ 7.64085
GYD 209.627114
HKD 7.84215
HNL 27.07504
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.052321
HUF 326.000354
IDR 18108.5
ILS 3.18593
IMP 0.741654
INR 94.04725
IQD 1514
IRR 1891353.000352
ISK 122.790386
JEP 0.741654
JMD 158.687685
JOD 0.70904
JPY 158.50504
KES 129.950385
KGS 87.447804
KHR 4080.00035
KMF 442.00035
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1363.803789
KWD 0.31098
KYD 0.833408
KZT 448.201333
LAK 22505.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 332.502562
LRD 170.303772
LSL 16.560381
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.430381
MAD 9.757504
MDL 17.8737
MGA 4595.000347
MKD 55.203803
MMK 2099.952938
MNT 3601.972253
MOP 8.072028
MRU 40.250379
MUR 47.030378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 18.62534
MYR 4.061504
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.560377
NGN 1347.210377
NIO 36.610377
NOK 9.459904
NPR 150.173627
NZD 1.803102
OMR 0.384144
PAB 0.999964
PEN 3.442504
PGK 4.492039
PHP 63.108038
PKR 276.625038
PLN 3.94555
PYG 6249.384815
QAR 3.643038
RON 4.792204
RSD 105.586038
RUB 81.925564
RWF 1475
SAR 3.754695
SBD 8.048583
SCR 14.018084
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.894504
SGD 1.282604
SHP 0.748923
SLE 22.950371
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.583504
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.275
SVC 8.748764
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.560369
THB 33.550369
TJS 9.224126
TMT 3.5
TND 2.985504
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.141304
TTD 6.780829
TWD 32.775304
TZS 2642.503628
UAH 45.297
UGX 4089.81484
UYU 40.226773
UZS 12000.000334
VES 896.316404
VND 25582.5
VUV 119.513361
WST 2.778515
XAF 588.264929
XAG 0.019249
XAU 0.00024594347
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801976
XDR 0.707052
XOF 588.264929
XPF 107.450363
YER 236.625037
ZAR 16.51847
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.318702
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.196153
MXV 2.095424
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study
Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study / Photo: © AFP/File

Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study

Struggle to wrap your head around daylight savings? Spare a thought for the world's timekeepers, who are trying to work out how climate change is affecting Earth's rotation -- and in turn, how we keep track of time.

Text size:

In a strange twist, global warming could even help out timekeepers by delaying the need for history's first "negative leap second" by three years, a study published on Wednesday suggested.

Experts fear that introducing a negative leap second -- a minute with only 59 seconds -- into standard time could cause havoc on computer systems across the world.

For most of history, time was measured by the rotation of the Earth. However in 1967, the world's timekeepers embraced atomic clocks -- which use the frequency of atoms as their tick-tock -- ushering in a more precise era of timekeeping.

But sailors, who still relied on the Sun and stars for navigation, and others wanted to retain the connection between Earth's rotation and time.

There was a problem. Our planet is an unreliable clock, and had long been rotating slightly slower than atomic time, meaning the two measurements were out of sync.

So a compromise was struck. Whenever the difference between the two measurements approached 0.9 of a second, a "leap second" was added to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the internationally agreed standard by which the world sets its clocks.

Though most people likely have not noticed, 27 leap seconds have been added to UTC since 1972, the last coming in 2016.

But in recent years a new problem has emerged that few saw coming: Earth's rotation has been speeding up, overtaking atomic time.

This means that to bring the two measurements in sync, timekeepers may have to introduce the first ever negative leap second.

- Our unpredictable planet -

"This has never happened before, and poses a major challenge to making sure that all parts of the global timing infrastructure show the same time," said Duncan Agnew, a researcher at the University of California, San Diego.

"Many computer programs for leap seconds assume they are all positive, so these would have to be rewritten," he told AFP.

Partly using satellite data, Agnew looked at the rate of the Earth's rotation and the effect of its slowing core for the new study published in the journal Nature.

He determined that if not for climate change, a negative leap second might have needed to be added to UTC as soon as 2026.

But starting from 1990, melting ice in Greenland and Antarctica has slowed down the Earth's rotation, the study said. This has delayed the need for a negative leap second until at least 2029, it added.

"When the ice melts, the water spreads out over the whole ocean; this increases the moment of inertia, which slows the Earth down," Agnew said.

If the need for an "unprecedented" negative leap second was delayed, that would be "welcome news indeed," Patrizia Tavella, the head of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, which is responsible for UTC, commented in Nature.

Demetrios Matsakis, former chief scientist for time services at the US Naval Observatory who was not involved in the research, told AFP that he was sceptical of Agnew's analysis.

He said that "Earth is too unpredictable to be sure" if a negative leap second would be needed any time soon.

- Second nature -

But all agreed that a negative leap second would be a hop into the unknown.

"It would not bring about the downfall of civilisation, and given enough publicity some problems could be avoided," Matsakis said.

"But I would not recommend being in an airplane at that time."

Even positive leap seconds have previously caused problems for systems that require precise timekeeping.

That is partly why the world's timekeepers agreed in 2022 to scrap the leap second by 2035.

From that year, the plan is to allow the difference between atomic time and the Earth's rotation to grow up to a minute.

A subsequent leap minute to bring them into sync is not expected to be needed in the next century.

And "a negative leap minute is very, very unlikely," Agnew said.

He hopes his research will prompt the world's timekeepers to consider dropping the leap second sooner than 2035, a sentiment echoed by Tavella and Matsakis.

U.Feng--ThChM