The China Mail - UK campaigners in green energy standoff reject 'nimby' label

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 65.000368
ALL 81.503989
AMD 360.340403
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1544.046724
AUD 1.454757
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.75029
BBD 2.013844
BDT 124.537437
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.37735
BIF 3010
BMD 1
BND 1.281347
BOB 11.99429
BRL 5.504904
BSD 0.999897
BTN 93.858629
BWP 13.774679
BYN 2.994523
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011053
CAD 1.41135
CDF 2320.000362
CHF 0.820469
CLF 0.02484
CLP 977.630396
CNY 6.676504
CNH 6.67282
COP 3251.53
CRC 453.465426
CUC 1
CUP 23.998962
CVE 99.403894
CZK 21.83445
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.708504
DOP 60.750393
DZD 136.38704
EGP 53.769786
ERN 15
ETB 161.203874
EUR 0.896804
FJD 2.25525
FKP 0.741654
GBP 0.748671
GEL 2.59504
GGP 0.741654
GHS 11.68504
GIP 0.741654
GMD 74.503851
GNF 8857.503848
GTQ 7.64085
GYD 209.627114
HKD 7.84215
HNL 27.07504
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.052321
HUF 326.000354
IDR 18108.5
ILS 3.18593
IMP 0.741654
INR 94.04725
IQD 1514
IRR 1891353.000352
ISK 122.790386
JEP 0.741654
JMD 158.687685
JOD 0.70904
JPY 158.50504
KES 129.950385
KGS 87.447804
KHR 4080.00035
KMF 442.00035
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1363.803789
KWD 0.31098
KYD 0.833408
KZT 448.201333
LAK 22505.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 332.502562
LRD 170.303772
LSL 16.560381
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.430381
MAD 9.757504
MDL 17.8737
MGA 4595.000347
MKD 55.203803
MMK 2099.952938
MNT 3601.972253
MOP 8.072028
MRU 40.250379
MUR 47.030378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 18.62534
MYR 4.061504
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.560377
NGN 1347.210377
NIO 36.610377
NOK 9.459904
NPR 150.173627
NZD 1.803102
OMR 0.384144
PAB 0.999964
PEN 3.442504
PGK 4.492039
PHP 63.108038
PKR 276.625038
PLN 3.94555
PYG 6249.384815
QAR 3.643038
RON 4.792204
RSD 105.586038
RUB 81.925564
RWF 1475
SAR 3.754695
SBD 8.048583
SCR 14.018084
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.894504
SGD 1.282604
SHP 0.748923
SLE 22.950371
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.583504
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.275
SVC 8.748764
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.560369
THB 33.550369
TJS 9.224126
TMT 3.5
TND 2.985504
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.141304
TTD 6.780829
TWD 32.775304
TZS 2642.503628
UAH 45.297
UGX 4089.81484
UYU 40.226773
UZS 12000.000334
VES 896.316404
VND 25582.5
VUV 119.513361
WST 2.778515
XAF 588.264929
XAG 0.019249
XAU 0.00024594347
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801976
XDR 0.707052
XOF 588.264929
XPF 107.450363
YER 236.625037
ZAR 16.51847
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.318702
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.196153
MXV 2.095424
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

UK campaigners in green energy standoff reject 'nimby' label
UK campaigners in green energy standoff reject 'nimby' label / Photo: © AFP

UK campaigners in green energy standoff reject 'nimby' label

With its medieval church and picturesque village green, the tranquil hamlet of Friston in eastern England should be an unlikely place for a showdown with the UK government and an energy giant.

Text size:

But Friston, population 341, is on the frontline of a bitter green energy battle between locals in the rural county of Suffolk and those who want to locate a vast energy hub there.

If the plans by National Grid -- backed by both the new Labour government and its Conservative predecessor -- go ahead, it will see the area transformed by steel and concrete for onshore substations.

Undersea cables from offshore windfarms would make landfall somewhere on the nearby coastline before being sent a few kilometres inland via huge "cable trenches", requiring years of disruptive construction work.

The government wants to decarbonise electricity supply by 2030. The Suffolk campaigners back that transition to renewables.

They warn, however, that current plans to bring green energy from offshore wind turbines into the grid via the planned infrastructure will be an ecological and tourism "catastrophe".

Thousands of jobs in Suffolk depend on the year-round visitors who flock to the county's beaches, coastal resorts and unspoilt countryside.

The area is particularly renowned for its protected birdlife.

Opposition to the plans could certainly appear to be driven by "nimbyism" -- the opposition to something being built or done in your local community, even if it has to be done elsewhere.

Suffolk residents are understandably keen to preserve their rural haven.

But the campaigners, who believe offshore infrastructure would both be less destructive and more efficient, argue the issues are far bigger.

- 'Laughed at' -

"We've been laughed at, because they say we're just nimbys. We've been mocked," said Fiona Gilmore, a former strategic adviser to emerging market countries, who set up the Suffolk Energy Action Solutions (SEAS) campaign group in 2019.

Branding her and other critics of the scheme "nimbys" -- or "not in my backyard" -- is just a convenient way of dismissing their justifiable concerns for nature and the environment, she added.

Those include the irreversible potential destruction of acres of heathland, habitat, coastline and wetland.

Adam Rowlands, of the bird protection body RSPB, said the dispute was far more than "just a local issue" and posed a real risk to the nearby North Warren nature reserve.

"A nationally important population spends the winter on those marshes," he said.

The RSPB "absolutely sees the need to transform our energy grid and infrastructure", he added.

"But we need to do that in a way that doesn't exacerbate the biodiversity crisis," he said, adding that offshore options also had disadvantages for marine ecology that had to be considered.

SEAS argues that the UK's North Sea neighbours such as Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium are already building offshore hubs and that these could work for the UK too.

The actor Ralph Fiennes, who spent his early childhood on the Suffolk coast, has thrown his support behind the drive for offshore alternatives.

"Yes, yes, yes to green power a million times over, the planet is lost without it," said Fiennes in a short film he made highlighting the ecological cost of the plans.

"But our very real human connection to the coast that defines us will be undermined and eroded unless we... implement that vital green power with a forward-thinking and environmentally enlightened vision," he said.

Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband, however, this week appeared to reject campaigners' pleas for a pause to reconsider the plans.

On Tuesday he vowed to "take on the blockers, the delayers, the obstructionists" to build clean energy infrastructure.

- 'Not listened to' -

The campaigners say they have been shaken by the way they have been treated by a system they describe as "not fit for purpose".

Despite spending hours preparing submissions for the various hearings organised as part of the planning process, Gilmore said the overwhelming impression campaigners had was of "not being listened to".

And she said the mental health issues for those caught up in the row were "massive".

People in Friston, near the market town of Saxmundham, "have been living with this nightmare hanging over them for over five years", she said.

"You can't just treat people like this."

Fellow campaigner Charlotte Fox, a retired intensive care anaesthetist, said she initially accepted National Grid's decision, believing it and the government were working in the national interest.

But after doing some research she said she concluded that there was now a "perfectly viable alternative option that is cheaper, better, faster" without the destruction that would be caused by what she considers an outdated scheme.

"What is the point of causing all this destruction and damaging the biodiversity that we are trying to save in the first place?"

L.Kwan--ThChM