The China Mail - Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 65.000368
ALL 81.503989
AMD 360.340403
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1544.046724
AUD 1.454757
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.75029
BBD 2.013844
BDT 124.537437
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.37735
BIF 3010
BMD 1
BND 1.281347
BOB 11.99429
BRL 5.504904
BSD 0.999897
BTN 93.858629
BWP 13.774679
BYN 2.994523
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011053
CAD 1.41135
CDF 2320.000362
CHF 0.820469
CLF 0.02484
CLP 977.630396
CNY 6.676504
CNH 6.67282
COP 3251.53
CRC 453.465426
CUC 1
CUP 23.998962
CVE 99.403894
CZK 21.83445
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.708504
DOP 60.750393
DZD 136.38704
EGP 53.769786
ERN 15
ETB 161.203874
EUR 0.896804
FJD 2.25525
FKP 0.741654
GBP 0.748671
GEL 2.59504
GGP 0.741654
GHS 11.68504
GIP 0.741654
GMD 74.503851
GNF 8857.503848
GTQ 7.64085
GYD 209.627114
HKD 7.84215
HNL 27.07504
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.052321
HUF 326.000354
IDR 18108.5
ILS 3.18593
IMP 0.741654
INR 94.04725
IQD 1514
IRR 1891353.000352
ISK 122.790386
JEP 0.741654
JMD 158.687685
JOD 0.70904
JPY 158.50504
KES 129.950385
KGS 87.447804
KHR 4080.00035
KMF 442.00035
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1363.803789
KWD 0.31098
KYD 0.833408
KZT 448.201333
LAK 22505.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 332.502562
LRD 170.303772
LSL 16.560381
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.430381
MAD 9.757504
MDL 17.8737
MGA 4595.000347
MKD 55.203803
MMK 2099.952938
MNT 3601.972253
MOP 8.072028
MRU 40.250379
MUR 47.030378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 18.62534
MYR 4.061504
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.560377
NGN 1347.210377
NIO 36.610377
NOK 9.459904
NPR 150.173627
NZD 1.803102
OMR 0.384144
PAB 0.999964
PEN 3.442504
PGK 4.492039
PHP 63.108038
PKR 276.625038
PLN 3.94555
PYG 6249.384815
QAR 3.643038
RON 4.792204
RSD 105.586038
RUB 81.925564
RWF 1475
SAR 3.754695
SBD 8.048583
SCR 14.018084
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.894504
SGD 1.282604
SHP 0.748923
SLE 22.950371
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.583504
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.275
SVC 8.748764
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.560369
THB 33.550369
TJS 9.224126
TMT 3.5
TND 2.985504
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.141304
TTD 6.780829
TWD 32.775304
TZS 2642.503628
UAH 45.297
UGX 4089.81484
UYU 40.226773
UZS 12000.000334
VES 896.316404
VND 25582.5
VUV 119.513361
WST 2.778515
XAF 588.264929
XAG 0.019249
XAU 0.00024594347
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801976
XDR 0.707052
XOF 588.264929
XPF 107.450363
YER 236.625037
ZAR 16.51847
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.318702
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.196153
MXV 2.095424
  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    19.71

    +2.03%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    20.4

    0%

  • BTI

    0.4200

    56.05

    +0.75%

  • BP

    0.2800

    44.43

    +0.63%

  • RBGPF

    1.6000

    67

    +2.39%

  • RIO

    -0.1500

    94.41

    -0.16%

  • AZN

    -0.4300

    166.15

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    49.7

    +0.93%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.56

    -1.99%

  • NGG

    -0.2500

    75.24

    -0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    16.58

    -0.24%

  • RELX

    -0.4500

    33.07

    -1.36%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    76.59

    -0.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    20.27

    -0.15%

  • JRI

    -0.2500

    10.77

    -2.32%

Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling
Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling / Photo: © AFP

Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling

The EU's top court said on Friday some international football rules regulating player transfers are contrary to the bloc's laws, in a landmark decision that could shake up the system.

Text size:

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) was called on to decide a long-running dispute between former French footballer Lassana Diarra and FIFA, over what happens when players unilaterally terminate their contract.

In a highly anticipated verdict, judges found that by restricting a footballers' ability to seek further employment, current FIFA rules hinder the EU's free movement and competition between clubs.

"The Court holds that all of those rules are contrary to EU law," it said.

The ruling could have far-reaching implications for the lucrative transfer market, allowing players to leave their club without fear of being legally trapped afterwards.

"In a way, the Lassana Diarra affair is the Bosman 2.0 affair," Diarra's Belgian lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont, said ahead of the judgement, predicting the "end" of the current system in case of a favourable verdict.

Dupont was also involved in the 1995 case of footballer Jean-Marc Bosman, which allowed players to move to another club at the end of their contract without a transfer fee being paid and also ended quotas on foreign players at clubs.

On Friday, he hailed the new ruling as "a total victory".

- Ten-year saga -

The Diarra saga goes back 10 years.

In August 2014, Lokomotiv terminated the midfielder's contract citing contractual breaches by the player. The Russian club also sought 20 million euros ($22m) compensation from Diarra.

Diarra, now 39, refused and requested that Lokomotiv pay him compensation.

He was eventually ordered to pay his former club 10 million euros by FIFA, a fine that was upheld by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Diarra also received a backdated 15-month suspension.

According to FIFA regulations, if a player terminates his contract unilaterally and "without just cause", he must pay compensation which includes his remuneration and benefits until the end of his contract.

Additionally, a purchasing club could be held jointly liable for any compensation and, in certain cases, be banned from signing any new players for a given period.

National football associations are also forced to refuse to issue a certificate needed to complete a transfer while a dispute is pending.

As a result clubs were not rushing to recruit Diarra after he left Lokomotiv.

His lawyers argued the rules violated the EU's free movement of workers, and by limiting the ability of clubs to recruit, were contrary to the principle of free competition within the 27-nation bloc.

Diarra requested six million euros from FIFA, on the grounds that he was prevented from playing during most of the 2014-2015 season.

Belgian side Charleroi rescinded their contract offer, afraid of the possible legal and financial consequences.

- Considerable risk -

After several twists and turns, a Belgian court asked the CJEU its opinion on the matter.

On Friday, the CJEU found that the rules impede the free movement of players by "imposing considerable legal risks, unforeseeable and potentially very high financial risks as well as major sporting risks on those players and clubs wishing to employ them".

Although some restrictions could be justified to allow a certain degree of stability in the player rosters of football clubs, the rules in question went beyond "what is necessary to pursue that objective", it said.

Judges said the burden put on purchasing clubs had as object the restriction, and even prevention, of cross-border competition, and as such did "not appear to be indispensable or necessary".

The ruling throws the world of football transfers into uncertainty.

Smaller teams often rely on trading players to sustain their finances -- recruiting young prospects on the cheap to later sell them at a high price.

Clubs currently have no obligation to let players go before the end of their contract, which gives management power in transfer negotiations, a lever they seem to stand to lose.

Capped 34 times by France, Diarra also played for Chelsea, Arsenal, Portsmouth and Real Madrid before ending his career at Paris Saint-Germain in 2019.

M.Zhou--ThChM