The China Mail - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.672495
AFN 62.497214
ALL 81.973555
AMD 368.642993
ANG 1.79046
AOA 917.999758
ARS 1427.244404
AUD 1.397233
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.697801
BAM 1.681396
BBD 2.01679
BDT 122.910935
BGN 1.66992
BHD 0.377673
BIF 2981.013502
BMD 1
BND 1.279321
BOB 6.918815
BRL 5.0396
BSD 1.001294
BTN 95.070861
BWP 13.443319
BYN 2.766284
BYR 19600
BZD 2.013867
CAD 1.384665
CDF 2259.999839
CHF 0.78664
CLF 0.022682
CLP 892.719826
CNY 6.76525
CNH 6.760655
COP 3567.1
CRC 454.953813
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.795755
CZK 20.870901
DJF 178.310601
DKK 6.424655
DOP 58.476868
DZD 132.509794
EGP 52.019198
ERN 15
ETB 158.689644
EUR 0.859702
FJD 2.196898
FKP 0.743127
GBP 0.743245
GEL 2.670235
GGP 0.743127
GHS 11.775427
GIP 0.743127
GMD 72.999994
GNF 8777.774434
GTQ 7.63851
GYD 209.490159
HKD 7.838395
HNL 26.647295
HRK 6.4773
HTG 131.080878
HUF 305.902983
IDR 17882
ILS 2.82165
IMP 0.743127
INR 95.11995
IQD 1311.720634
IRR 1351250.000325
ISK 123.45005
JEP 0.743127
JMD 157.722794
JOD 0.709009
JPY 159.706976
KES 129.730316
KGS 87.449784
KHR 4018.277402
KMF 424.000328
KPW 899.855249
KRW 1517.814982
KWD 0.30919
KYD 0.834419
KZT 489.67293
LAK 21946.071878
LBP 89670.516728
LKR 331.314503
LRD 182.74823
LSL 16.309785
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.344995
MAD 9.199498
MDL 17.273114
MGA 4210.010488
MKD 52.999007
MMK 2099.46933
MNT 3576.500339
MOP 8.083528
MRU 39.980333
MUR 47.350221
MVR 15.410445
MWK 1737.000253
MXN 17.358012
MYR 3.964801
MZN 63.904946
NAD 16.309837
NGN 1371.709939
NIO 36.847897
NOK 9.289951
NPR 152.112071
NZD 1.68687
OMR 0.3845
PAB 1.00129
PEN 3.403973
PGK 4.375991
PHP 61.723502
PKR 278.297759
PLN 3.64195
PYG 6026.556395
QAR 3.6435
RON 4.511802
RSD 100.915997
RUB 72.000309
RWF 1462
SAR 3.756754
SBD 8.03246
SCR 12.814958
SDG 600.50062
SEK 9.309325
SGD 1.278695
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.649858
SLL 20969.502105
SOS 571.502233
SRD 37.284499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.35
SVC 8.761998
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.319991
THB 32.601498
TJS 9.242382
TMT 3.5
TND 2.9115
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.9359
TTD 6.800177
TWD 31.436024
TZS 2610.002991
UAH 44.374817
UGX 3774.914998
UYU 40.199623
UZS 11930.88033
VES 548.68505
VND 26331.5
VUV 118.463821
WST 2.715189
XAF 563.934215
XAG 0.013295
XAU 0.000223
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.804669
XDR 0.701353
XOF 563.926943
XPF 102.52751
YER 238.603205
ZAR 16.314602
ZMK 9001.201556
ZMW 18.199169
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0300

    22.77

    +0.13%

  • NGG

    -1.5300

    80

    -1.91%

  • BCC

    -1.1700

    68.33

    -1.71%

  • CMSD

    -0.1300

    22.8

    -0.57%

  • BTI

    -0.7900

    61

    -1.3%

  • BP

    1.0700

    42.94

    +2.49%

  • BCE

    -0.0500

    25.06

    -0.2%

  • RIO

    2.5700

    108.96

    +2.36%

  • AZN

    -5.9600

    179.71

    -3.32%

  • GSK

    -1.2300

    49.31

    -2.49%

  • RBGPF

    -3.0200

    60.52

    -4.99%

  • JRI

    -0.2600

    12.66

    -2.05%

  • RYCEF

    -0.8400

    17.16

    -4.9%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    14.97

    +0.07%

  • RELX

    1.8100

    34.6

    +5.23%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.