The China Mail - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.503991
ALL 83.072963
AMD 376.980403
ANG 1.790083
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1386.420402
AUD 1.448436
AWG 1.80025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.695072
BBD 2.009612
BDT 122.428639
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.378163
BIF 2970
BMD 1
BND 1.2851
BOB 6.894519
BRL 5.160604
BSD 0.997742
BTN 92.939509
BWP 13.688562
BYN 2.956504
BYR 19600
BZD 2.006665
CAD 1.39475
CDF 2305.000362
CHF 0.79876
CLF 0.023281
CLP 919.250396
CNY 6.88265
CNH 6.886225
COP 3668.42
CRC 464.279833
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.000359
CZK 21.288304
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.487804
DOP 60.850393
DZD 133.256954
EGP 54.334939
ERN 15
ETB 155.800822
EUR 0.86804
FJD 2.253804
FKP 0.757614
GBP 0.756401
GEL 2.68504
GGP 0.757614
GHS 11.00504
GIP 0.757614
GMD 74.000355
GNF 8780.000355
GTQ 7.632939
GYD 208.828972
HKD 7.83775
HNL 26.504427
HRK 6.539104
HTG 130.952897
HUF 333.930388
IDR 16994.6
ILS 3.130375
IMP 0.757614
INR 92.73995
IQD 1307.141959
IRR 1319175.000352
ISK 125.380386
JEP 0.757614
JMD 157.303566
JOD 0.70904
JPY 159.65404
KES 129.803801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 3990.137323
KMF 427.00035
KPW 899.985922
KRW 1511.260383
KWD 0.30934
KYD 0.831502
KZT 472.805432
LAK 21970.392969
LBP 89502.03926
LKR 314.804623
LRD 183.088277
LSL 16.955078
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.380628
MAD 9.374033
MDL 17.55613
MGA 4171.343141
MKD 53.495639
MMK 2099.969769
MNT 3573.217716
MOP 8.055104
MRU 39.637211
MUR 46.950378
MVR 15.460378
MWK 1730.071718
MXN 17.891704
MYR 4.031039
MZN 63.950377
NAD 16.954711
NGN 1378.130377
NIO 36.712196
NOK 9.77265
NPR 148.701282
NZD 1.750854
OMR 0.385097
PAB 0.997734
PEN 3.45194
PGK 4.316042
PHP 60.409504
PKR 278.39991
PLN 3.71375
PYG 6454.29687
QAR 3.638018
RON 4.416604
RSD 101.901662
RUB 80.325739
RWF 1457.240049
SAR 3.754558
SBD 8.038772
SCR 14.424038
SDG 601.000339
SEK 9.483104
SGD 1.286704
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.650371
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 570.192924
SRD 37.351038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.233539
SVC 8.730169
SYP 110.556627
SZL 16.948198
THB 32.635038
TJS 9.563492
TMT 3.51
TND 2.941459
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.520504
TTD 6.768937
TWD 31.995038
TZS 2600.000335
UAH 43.698134
UGX 3743.234401
UYU 40.405091
UZS 12122.393971
VES 473.390504
VND 26340
VUV 119.346905
WST 2.766243
XAF 568.506489
XAG 0.013693
XAU 0.000214
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.798209
XDR 0.708068
XOF 568.516344
XPF 103.361457
YER 238.650363
ZAR 16.972865
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 19.281421
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSD

    0.1100

    22.26

    +0.49%

  • AZN

    2.7600

    203.49

    +1.36%

  • BTI

    0.3900

    58.28

    +0.67%

  • NGG

    1.1500

    87.99

    +1.31%

  • GSK

    0.7000

    56.69

    +1.23%

  • RELX

    0.3600

    33.59

    +1.07%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    22.04

    +0.23%

  • RYCEF

    0.9000

    15.99

    +5.63%

  • BCE

    -0.9300

    24.45

    -3.8%

  • RIO

    -0.3600

    94.45

    -0.38%

  • VOD

    0.0800

    15.21

    +0.53%

  • BCC

    -1.8800

    73.2

    -2.57%

  • JRI

    0.0900

    12.61

    +0.71%

  • BP

    0.9500

    47.12

    +2.02%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.