The China Mail - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.673003
AFN 70.492858
ALL 82.401192
AMD 382.950143
ANG 1.789783
AOA 916.999812
ARS 1415.981897
AUD 1.518188
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.696045
BAM 1.664072
BBD 2.014277
BDT 121.712569
BGN 1.66815
BHD 0.376983
BIF 2950
BMD 1
BND 1.280768
BOB 6.9104
BRL 5.434195
BSD 1.000077
BTN 88.105266
BWP 13.339232
BYN 3.383363
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011341
CAD 1.38433
CDF 2875.000029
CHF 0.797095
CLF 0.024658
CLP 967.319951
CNY 7.121499
CNH 7.12202
COP 3922.55
CRC 504.973156
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.374981
CZK 20.767044
DJF 177.719751
DKK 6.373298
DOP 63.724979
DZD 129.394962
EGP 47.969897
ERN 15
ETB 142.649842
EUR 0.85368
FJD 2.285036
FKP 0.73831
GBP 0.739245
GEL 2.697519
GGP 0.73831
GHS 12.102255
GIP 0.73831
GMD 72.496617
GNF 8654.999784
GTQ 7.664361
GYD 209.129196
HKD 7.78834
HNL 26.159759
HRK 6.433097
HTG 130.858536
HUF 335.589797
IDR 16445.25
ILS 3.3443
IMP 0.73831
INR 88.226501
IQD 1310
IRR 42074.999856
ISK 122.420045
JEP 0.73831
JMD 160.025866
JOD 0.708975
JPY 147.339498
KES 129.497688
KGS 87.450249
KHR 4003.999752
KMF 419.50009
KPW 900.017696
KRW 1388.784984
KWD 0.305497
KYD 0.833383
KZT 536.632888
LAK 21685.000459
LBP 89550.000031
LKR 301.971395
LRD 200.449819
LSL 17.509843
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.41014
MAD 9.024984
MDL 16.57577
MGA 4477.497857
MKD 52.360654
MMK 2099.496156
MNT 3597.2822
MOP 8.021186
MRU 39.934997
MUR 45.910276
MVR 15.399789
MWK 1737.000221
MXN 18.64141
MYR 4.205999
MZN 63.950014
NAD 17.5103
NGN 1507.399098
NIO 36.650108
NOK 9.978935
NPR 140.968766
NZD 1.68709
OMR 0.384499
PAB 1.000055
PEN 3.51205
PGK 4.162501
PHP 57.021015
PKR 281.549731
PLN 3.626997
PYG 7163.216513
QAR 3.64095
RON 4.330496
RSD 100.040978
RUB 83.69683
RWF 1446
SAR 3.751905
SBD 8.230592
SCR 14.186018
SDG 600.497294
SEK 9.37968
SGD 1.282865
SHP 0.785843
SLE 23.339773
SLL 20969.49797
SOS 571.49623
SRD 39.2285
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.25
SVC 8.750883
SYP 13002.137026
SZL 17.510107
THB 31.735503
TJS 9.410508
TMT 3.5
TND 2.902771
TOP 2.342103
TRY 41.260625
TTD 6.786295
TWD 30.33501
TZS 2486.091968
UAH 41.185139
UGX 3502.905616
UYU 39.963924
UZS 12449.999989
VES 153.53669
VND 26387.5
VUV 120.159341
WST 2.784013
XAF 558.114029
XAG 0.024474
XAU 0.000274
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802418
XDR 0.693539
XOF 561.000035
XPF 102.049569
YER 239.649929
ZAR 17.52949
ZMK 9001.202122
ZMW 23.976143
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.0300

    24.14

    -0.12%

  • SCS

    -0.3400

    16.88

    -2.01%

  • GSK

    0.7300

    40.78

    +1.79%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    13.78

    +0.36%

  • NGG

    -0.0600

    70.36

    -0.09%

  • RIO

    -1.8500

    61.87

    -2.99%

  • BCC

    -3.7300

    85.29

    -4.37%

  • RBGPF

    1.8400

    77.27

    +2.38%

  • BCE

    -0.1900

    24.2

    -0.79%

  • CMSD

    -0.0200

    24.37

    -0.08%

  • AZN

    -0.3400

    81.22

    -0.42%

  • BTI

    0.0700

    56.26

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1300

    14.65

    -0.89%

  • RELX

    -0.1200

    47.19

    -0.25%

  • VOD

    0.0600

    11.86

    +0.51%

  • BP

    0.1800

    34.09

    +0.53%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.