The China Mail - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.67305
AFN 66.496721
ALL 83.872087
AMD 382.480316
ANG 1.789982
AOA 917.000151
ARS 1450.743722
AUD 1.543543
AWG 1.805
AZN 1.721313
BAM 1.69722
BBD 2.01352
BDT 122.007836
BGN 1.69435
BHD 0.376961
BIF 2952.5
BMD 1
BND 1.304378
BOB 6.907594
BRL 5.350197
BSD 0.999679
BTN 88.558647
BWP 13.450775
BYN 3.407125
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010578
CAD 1.41132
CDF 2154.999794
CHF 0.806245
CLF 0.024029
CLP 942.659758
CNY 7.11935
CNH 7.122085
COP 3784.25
CRC 502.442792
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.849785
CZK 21.08085
DJF 177.720149
DKK 6.46669
DOP 64.301661
DZD 130.471267
EGP 47.303968
ERN 15
ETB 153.49263
EUR 0.86605
FJD 2.28525
FKP 0.766404
GBP 0.76133
GEL 2.715005
GGP 0.766404
GHS 10.92632
GIP 0.766404
GMD 73.510149
GNF 8677.881382
GTQ 7.6608
GYD 209.15339
HKD 7.774805
HNL 26.286056
HRK 6.524997
HTG 130.827172
HUF 334.350298
IDR 16686.5
ILS 3.261445
IMP 0.766404
INR 88.675601
IQD 1309.660176
IRR 42112.499919
ISK 126.620161
JEP 0.766404
JMD 160.35857
JOD 0.709006
JPY 153.072498
KES 129.14997
KGS 87.450262
KHR 4012.669762
KMF 420.999708
KPW 900.033283
KRW 1448.119782
KWD 0.306898
KYD 0.833167
KZT 526.13127
LAK 21717.265947
LBP 89523.367365
LKR 304.861328
LRD 182.946302
LSL 17.373217
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.466197
MAD 9.311066
MDL 17.114592
MGA 4508.159378
MKD 53.394772
MMK 2099.044592
MNT 3585.031206
MOP 8.005051
MRU 39.997917
MUR 45.999381
MVR 15.405019
MWK 1733.486063
MXN 18.57444
MYR 4.18297
MZN 63.960351
NAD 17.373217
NGN 1438.169534
NIO 36.78522
NOK 10.201703
NPR 141.693568
NZD 1.774497
OMR 0.384501
PAB 0.999779
PEN 3.375927
PGK 4.279045
PHP 58.997504
PKR 282.679805
PLN 3.68034
PYG 7081.988268
QAR 3.643566
RON 4.403984
RSD 101.501994
RUB 81.251088
RWF 1452.596867
SAR 3.750504
SBD 8.223823
SCR 15.060272
SDG 600.496692
SEK 9.5646
SGD 1.304202
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.197134
SLL 20969.499529
SOS 571.349231
SRD 38.503497
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.260533
SVC 8.747304
SYP 11056.895466
SZL 17.359159
THB 32.399408
TJS 9.227278
TMT 3.5
TND 2.959939
TOP 2.342104
TRY 42.099355
TTD 6.773954
TWD 30.984983
TZS 2459.806975
UAH 42.066455
UGX 3491.096532
UYU 39.813947
UZS 11966.746503
VES 227.27225
VND 26315
VUV 122.169446
WST 2.82328
XAF 569.234174
XAG 0.020825
XAU 0.000251
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801686
XDR 0.70875
XOF 569.231704
XPF 103.489719
YER 238.483762
ZAR 17.37062
ZMK 9001.20436
ZMW 22.61803
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    76

    0%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.75

    -0.15%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    23.78

    -0.21%

  • SCS

    -0.1700

    15.76

    -1.08%

  • NGG

    0.9200

    76.29

    +1.21%

  • BCC

    -0.6500

    70.73

    -0.92%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    24.01

    0%

  • BTI

    0.3300

    54.21

    +0.61%

  • RIO

    0.2100

    69.27

    +0.3%

  • GSK

    0.4100

    47.1

    +0.87%

  • RELX

    -1.1900

    43.39

    -2.74%

  • RYCEF

    0.0600

    15

    +0.4%

  • BCE

    0.7800

    23.17

    +3.37%

  • AZN

    2.6200

    83.77

    +3.13%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    11.34

    +0.62%

  • BP

    0.1400

    35.82

    +0.39%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.