The China Mail - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 62.500427
ALL 82.049533
AMD 368.642993
ANG 1.79046
AOA 918.000213
ARS 1427.231597
AUD 1.39544
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.701691
BAM 1.681396
BBD 2.01679
BDT 122.910935
BGN 1.66992
BHD 0.377673
BIF 2981.013502
BMD 1
BND 1.279321
BOB 6.918815
BRL 5.027204
BSD 1.001294
BTN 95.070861
BWP 13.443319
BYN 2.766284
BYR 19600
BZD 2.013867
CAD 1.384455
CDF 2259.99969
CHF 0.785895
CLF 0.022682
CLP 892.719773
CNY 6.76525
CNH 6.75967
COP 3567.02
CRC 454.953813
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.795755
CZK 20.8518
DJF 178.310601
DKK 6.41948
DOP 58.476868
DZD 132.509911
EGP 52.021499
ERN 15
ETB 157.949975
EUR 0.858982
FJD 2.19645
FKP 0.743127
GBP 0.742495
GEL 2.660276
GGP 0.743127
GHS 11.775427
GIP 0.743127
GMD 73.000108
GNF 8777.774434
GTQ 7.63851
GYD 209.490159
HKD 7.837545
HNL 26.570038
HRK 6.471098
HTG 131.080878
HUF 305.184501
IDR 17840
ILS 2.819702
IMP 0.743127
INR 95.11385
IQD 1310
IRR 1351250.000556
ISK 123.36955
JEP 0.743127
JMD 157.722794
JOD 0.709012
JPY 159.730504
KES 129.402891
KGS 87.450314
KHR 4018.277402
KMF 424.000383
KPW 899.855249
KRW 1515.940244
KWD 0.30917
KYD 0.834419
KZT 489.67293
LAK 21946.071878
LBP 89670.516728
LKR 331.314503
LRD 182.74823
LSL 16.310234
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.345005
MAD 9.199503
MDL 17.273114
MGA 4185.00019
MKD 52.960813
MMK 2099.46933
MNT 3576.500339
MOP 8.083528
MRU 39.979783
MUR 47.410006
MVR 15.410457
MWK 1737.000004
MXN 17.336102
MYR 3.965199
MZN 63.90499
NAD 16.310112
NGN 1370.850328
NIO 36.600731
NOK 9.276701
NPR 152.112071
NZD 1.68456
OMR 0.384507
PAB 1.00129
PEN 3.404025
PGK 4.35925
PHP 61.690502
PKR 278.29576
PLN 3.636775
PYG 6026.556395
QAR 3.643503
RON 4.512019
RSD 100.85038
RUB 71.997526
RWF 1462
SAR 3.756754
SBD 8.026013
SCR 14.821371
SDG 600.496201
SEK 9.28986
SGD 1.278298
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.650168
SLL 20969.502105
SOS 571.499577
SRD 37.284496
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.35
SVC 8.761998
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.320146
THB 32.534012
TJS 9.242382
TMT 3.51
TND 2.911498
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.929202
TTD 6.800177
TWD 31.447196
TZS 2627.813033
UAH 44.374817
UGX 3774.914998
UYU 40.199623
UZS 11970.000168
VES 557.27663
VND 26332.5
VUV 118.463821
WST 2.715189
XAF 563.934215
XAG 0.013052
XAU 0.000221
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.804669
XDR 0.701353
XOF 563.000279
XPF 103.049771
YER 238.624985
ZAR 16.256355
ZMK 9001.208022
ZMW 18.199169
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0300

    22.77

    +0.13%

  • RYCEF

    -0.8400

    17.16

    -4.9%

  • RIO

    2.5700

    108.96

    +2.36%

  • NGG

    -1.5300

    80

    -1.91%

  • RBGPF

    -3.0200

    60.52

    -4.99%

  • BCE

    -0.0500

    25.06

    -0.2%

  • BTI

    -0.7900

    61

    -1.3%

  • AZN

    -5.9600

    179.71

    -3.32%

  • RELX

    1.8100

    34.6

    +5.23%

  • GSK

    -1.2300

    49.31

    -2.49%

  • BCC

    -1.1700

    68.33

    -1.71%

  • JRI

    -0.2600

    12.66

    -2.05%

  • CMSD

    -0.1300

    22.8

    -0.57%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    14.97

    +0.07%

  • BP

    1.0700

    42.94

    +2.49%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.